I'm Not a Genius Detective

1. The current cases are all social cases. It is too difficult to write well in a non-closed environment. The suspects in social cases blend into the sea, and more clues have to be obtained through visits, surveillance, etc. It is difficult to always focus on the protagonist in solving the case, or only the protagonist can obtain the deus ex machina. To get key information, or to make other police officers mentally retarded, the author's current approach is to use the case-within-a-case approach, letting the supporting characters uncover the ironclad case on the surface, and then letting the protagonist uncover the underlying hidden case alone. The look and feel is okay, but I can't bear to repeat it. I've used it twice in a row, and I'll see if I can come up with something new in the future. 2. There is a problem with the configuration of the protagonist. To be honest, as the Chinese version of Batman, Goldfinger's presence is too low. It has "bad guy sense" and "force value", but the sense of presence is too thin. In order to hide the real murderer, the "bad guy sense" has been reduced to a concept. It cannot lock the murderer in the early stage, so it is just a gimmick. As for the force value, Because the author has an obsession with "restoring reality", he can't arrange a plot where he can kill an entire gang with his bare hands, including a dozen headshots and reloading in the air. As a result, the protagonist's high force value cannot be used to show off and create excitement, and it is basically useless. The reborn Batman has become an ordinary detective with excellent marksmanship. So why not write a genius detective from the beginning? If no adjustments are made, this problem will become more and more obvious in the later stages. The higher the protagonist's position, the more attention he receives, and the less he can do things out of bounds. This Batman setting will become more and more marginalized, and the more difficult it will be for the protagonist's character logic to complete the closed loop. 3. The author seems to have designed the identity of the "original body", but it seems to be a bit of a joke at the moment, and conflicts with the "realism" and "authenticity" that he has been creating. While trying to restore the real police workplace and case handling process to limit the protagonist's activities within the frame, he also arranged "high-end customization" for him. "Child Bride", in a quasi-modern worldview, designs super old money, hides forces and even underground families, fighting each other. Once the family is established in the subsequent plot, the "reality" that has been created with great effort will completely collapse, and the subsequent development will be even more catastrophic. How did these families come into being? What is its ecological niche in society? Who are they competing against? Who is the enemy? Who is the friend? It's hard to be self-consistent. If you accidentally hit a red line and get blocked, you will simply cause trouble for yourself. Either it should be true to the end from the beginning, don't give the protagonist any Batman gimmicks, and honestly write about low-level police officers handling cases and write cases and write reality, or go for a purely cool novel in an imaginary world, let the protagonist kill and counterattack all the way, and write about contemporary martial arts. It is easy to break the egg if you walk with two legs apart, but if the circle comes back in the follow-up, I will pretend that I didn't say it. That's about it. I'm personally still interested in this story to see its subsequent development.

1. After the antique case, it was too simple. Several cases in a row basically went from A to B, B to C. I know you want to write about social cases, but you are writing a novel, brother, you can't really let readers watch the protagonist check the surveillance camera to solve the case, right? It seems that the case has been solved since the Antique Case, but it is basically not that exciting. The protagonist is either investigating surveillance interviews or outputting values. He talks about how complex this supporting role is, trying to use value methods to cover up the plain water of the case itself. I wanted to say it a few weeks ago, but I really can't hold it in anymore. 2. It is too unstable as an electronic mustard To sum up, I have found a new mustard and withdraw it now. I wish the author will write better and better. See you again.

Does the character and ability of the protagonist deserve a nine-digit wanted number? Any little girl can follow you home without being discovered, and you can't even manage the most basic expressions, let alone acting skills. The one from Most Wanted who isn't proficient in acting?

I think the protagonist's character and the speed of the case are very good. The plot design of the case also looks very reasonable. The main reason is that the process of investigating the case is not written inexplicably. Very nice. I gave all the recommended monthly tickets

I feel like I don't have the desire to continue reading. The emotional line is awkward to watch. Personally, I don't think it's as well written as the previous book.

Have you been looking for a college student for more than ten days? The author's writing becomes more and more like prose.

It looks good, but the author is too lazy and too little.

I didn't have the desire to read the previous book, but I felt a bit tired after reading it.

The content is not boring and you are interested in reading it.

I see that the male protagonist is reborn and is a detective, so in books with this type of theme, I still like the male protagonist to solve unsolved cases, especially the unsolved cases that have not been solved for several years. In this way, the male protagonist can solve them. I prefer reading this kind of books.