The Wizard in Hogwarts is Unscientific

The writing is very good at the beginning, but why does it become more and more like a plot (the domineering president falls in love with me) as it goes on? The author really likes this kind of plot and can write it in a female channel, why should he write it in a male channel? I feel so disgusting.

I don't understand the protagonist's two lives. She always emphasizes independence and plays the role of the overbearing CEO's little wife. How dare you write it when you are twelve years old. She is still a girlfriend and is obsessed with magic. Hermione, who was originally three-dimensional, was written into a facial expression. She has no courage and pride and can only be angry, hum, and act like a baby. Using an adult's mind to pursue a twelve-year-old girl in an era before the Internet, isn't this a kind of rape and bullying? Stench

He and Hermione were always inseparable, and it felt like he was always in a relationship. . .

I don't understand why so many Harry fandom characters want to learn black magic in the first grade, but they don't understand ordinary white magic. He didn't even have a solid foundation, and Voldemort didn't learn dark magic until he was in fourth or fifth grade.

Why do you want to sit next to Hermione? It's like a piece of cake. It's not like you can't write if you don't sit next to her. You write like an idiot. There is no main plot and the plot is the same.

This book has a good story though But there are many places where the author seems to have never read Harry Potter. You said that you have only seen the movie, so Hermione is indeed good, but her impulsiveness is not mentioned at all. Hermione's mobility and impulsiveness are much worse than Harry's. Anyone not named Hermione wouldn't be so speechless Besides, there is news about an old man who lived to be over 800 years old and held a party in the movie. Armando, the new principal, was over 300 years old and almost 400 years old, and he is still alive and kicking. But they say wizards have about the same lifespan as Muggles But you said that you read the novel and over-glorified Hermione's abilities. Ron is obviously the wisest among the three. Harry is the strongest Hermione knows a lot but is not good at everything. But the two Harrows in the author's book are not much better than the two retarded men in the movie. So it's not the world view in the book It's completely like reading a few marketing accounts and writing him seriously into a novel. A haphazardly pieced together worldview

The three Hallows of Death, Dumbledore, Harry Potter, and Voldemort, died in the same way as in the story. Dumbledore had the Elder Wand and was killed by the weak like a boss. Voldemort took the initiative to kill his own soul just like the second child. Only Harry Potter and the third child live to die of old age

The protagonist has incorrect views and is a refined egoist.

Both the actor and Hermione in the book are trash. In the book, she is ugly and double-standard, and the actor is even more disgusting.

Who is the protagonist? The plot has shifted, and the protagonist's plot remains unchanged. I write some of the original plot of Harry Potter every day. You can just copy the original Harry Potter book.