
Daluo Hunyuanxian
by Ah Bai Chi
About This Novel
Mortals in the world of mortals follow life and death, reproduce endlessly, gain and lose joy and sorrow, and have burning desires. Daluo Celestial Immortal, immortal, immortal, blissful in the fairyland, without any worries!
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(6)Scraped 5d ago
Secondary post
Let's make a secondary post. Friends who need it can write it down. You can write down basic information, such as name, qualifications, cultivation, skills, weapons, and origin.
After reading Chapter 50, there isn't much serious business, it's all about dialogue. It's embarrassing to watch
What the author is best at is describing the worldview, sects, and family balance, rationally yet without losing sensibility, and describing the world of immortality from the perspective of wisdom! A good advantage of this book is that it inherits the advantages of the previous book, its description of the relationship between sects, families, and casual cultivators. In particular, he has developed his own advantages and is good at describing sects and middle- and high-level monks. However, I personally like the author's writing style in this aspect, but it is not very good for the book as a whole. Especially a book must be neutral, with ups and downs, and constant transitions of exciting points, so that people don't want to stop reading. Although trivial writing has been popular for a while, the successful ones are either biased in character or non-toxic! Especially since the main character in this book doesn't have much plot and doesn't have a group portrait, and at the same time the main character is a traditional protagonist, it's not very satisfying. Especially when comparing supporting characters, certain platform types can be extremely toxic. For the portrayal of human nature, objective description is naturally the best, but it is not suitable for the protagonist, either decisive or ideal! Personally, I don't like how I deal with my little sister. She's very affectionate, and it's easy for her to become poisonous later on. But if it is written better than the protagonist, it will be more enjoyable. Personally, I think the author should be more traditional. On this basis, he should give full play to his advantages and write unique features. It would be much better if he is popular and innovative.
It's okay, why isn't it updated?
The book is quite good, slow-paced, and you can see for yourself whether it suits your taste.
Alas, I thought it was a good book at the beginning, but it turned out to be a bait. It is not even a chess piece, and the protagonist is not a passerby. It seems that I have no idea what I am writing, and I have no sense of direction. How can you read this thing when you write it.
Rating
Community(0)
Official(6)Scraped 5d ago
Secondary post
Let's make a secondary post. Friends who need it can write it down. You can write down basic information, such as name, qualifications, cultivation, skills, weapons, and origin.
After reading Chapter 50, there isn't much serious business, it's all about dialogue. It's embarrassing to watch
What the author is best at is describing the worldview, sects, and family balance, rationally yet without losing sensibility, and describing the world of immortality from the perspective of wisdom! A good advantage of this book is that it inherits the advantages of the previous book, its description of the relationship between sects, families, and casual cultivators. In particular, he has developed his own advantages and is good at describing sects and middle- and high-level monks. However, I personally like the author's writing style in this aspect, but it is not very good for the book as a whole. Especially a book must be neutral, with ups and downs, and constant transitions of exciting points, so that people don't want to stop reading. Although trivial writing has been popular for a while, the successful ones are either biased in character or non-toxic! Especially since the main character in this book doesn't have much plot and doesn't have a group portrait, and at the same time the main character is a traditional protagonist, it's not very satisfying. Especially when comparing supporting characters, certain platform types can be extremely toxic. For the portrayal of human nature, objective description is naturally the best, but it is not suitable for the protagonist, either decisive or ideal! Personally, I don't like how I deal with my little sister. She's very affectionate, and it's easy for her to become poisonous later on. But if it is written better than the protagonist, it will be more enjoyable. Personally, I think the author should be more traditional. On this basis, he should give full play to his advantages and write unique features. It would be much better if he is popular and innovative.
It's okay, why isn't it updated?
The book is quite good, slow-paced, and you can see for yourself whether it suits your taste.
Alas, I thought it was a good book at the beginning, but it turned out to be a bait. It is not even a chess piece, and the protagonist is not a passerby. It seems that I have no idea what I am writing, and I have no sense of direction. How can you read this thing when you write it.









