Imitator of God

How should I put it? I am probably too deeply influenced by Western-style judicial and political systems. It is a bit ridiculous to be naive. The West especially likes to put forward many humanistic theories that seem to make sense. For example, there can be hundreds of genders, but there are only nine camps at most. I like to use data to prove theories, but ignore collection. I especially like to discuss human nature, but there will never be a choice of more than ten people (nowadays, Chinese people are more involved, maybe less than twenty). It is roughly understood that the larger the denominator, the numerical value will only tend to be 1 no matter what the choice of the numerator above. It's not conducive to division. We need more theories and more groups...

The first game is weird, right? Regardless of psychology, economics or other academic aspects, people have always been selfish, and the designed game is almost a death sentence for a person from a humanistic point of view, but it is targeted at a person who accidentally killed someone. It is not reasonable from any point of view. It seems to give the other party a great deal of laxity, or so-called rationality You can pass the level by thinking, but even if you put an ordinary person who has not committed any crime, or a person who can be considered kind in every sense of the word, there is still no need to dedicate his life for strangers, and people who dedicate such lives are generally called saints. If you use the game of testing saints to test a perpetrator, do you think this is reasonable?

Don't doubt yourself. The games you've written so far are better than Alice in the Land of the Dead Season 3. I came here to wash my eyes after watching those games. I hope that one day in the distant future, God's imitators will also be adapted into comics or even be adapted onto the big screen. The blind date game statistics battle and the draft return speech were so exciting! "Be careful in the next life" is definitely a famous scene of the century! Although the Fool Game also has elements of Liar Eater Air Poker, Gambling Silent Rock Paper Scissors, and Fraudulent Game Musical Chair, the final reversal and the frankness of the imitator and the win-win situation with the Fool players are really innovative. The smart rabbit did not expect to be betrayed because he acquiesced that the interests of the players came first, while the imitator sacrificed a large number of readily available visa time certificates to practice his own ideas, in exchange for a safe enough position in a new community with the same philosophy after revealing his identity. It can really be said that it is very reasonable for all members to have online IQs. I really like the community politics besides the battle of wits. It's a bit like the friendship cell in the Friends game. Once the majority forms the rule, it will become a hell for the minority. I feel that the author is wasting words and ink just to recruit new people who are male or female for a long time. You can go and see what happens to the people who fall into the minority in this level of the Friends game. I recommend the author to read Xiaofan's Peak of Wisdom series when his inspiration is exhausted. Another idea is that the protagonist later designed an SS-level game that changed the entire arcade, and the arcade itself is the only SSS-level game, designed by the strongest imitator of the previous generation.

It's quite boring, probably because the protagonist spends one chapter designing the game, then experiences the game, and leaves the remaining 10 chapters for passers-by to comment on how good the game design is. Fans can take a look.

It feels a bit like a primary school student pretending to be a pretentious person (B)... It's very childish and refreshing... Maybe when you get older, you won't be able to get this kind of secretly good people and bad guys after being busy and being praised by others without thinking, and then you don't care on the surface... Hiss... The author's imagination and writing style are always very good. Please be more mature when it comes to pitfalls in the next book.

Recommended, reading progress to the Plutocratic Kingdom part. The early Blood Poker, King's Judgment and Blind Date games were pretty good, but the copy of the Money Source game suddenly didn't look good. I don't know if it's because the protagonist has fewer scenes, and even the protagonist's character has begun to become blurry. I only remember that the protagonist is a lawyer. Particularly intelligent, because he is not only an athlete, but also a referee and planner, so I had high expectations for the comeback and the pretentious part. As a result, except for the second half of the blind date game, there was no surprise (either you guessed the comeback method in advance, or you cheated and that's it... As for other aspects of the protagonist, except for knowing what he is used to eating for breakfast, there is too little description, making it even more difficult to form a three-dimensional image. In addition, the supporting characters seem to have their personalities based on age + gender + occupation. This does allow readers to quickly identify members of the 17 community by labeling them, but that's about it. Although there are many characters, they are a bit bloated, and there is nothing that impresses me and makes me feel that this character is very interesting. There are 12 people in the community, and the gender is evenly divided. Generally speaking, men have more memory points, and the image of a programmer, boss, and doctor is more complete. On the female side, for example, models and foodies are two tool people. Based on their performance and role in what I read, I feel that they can be combined into one. Executives and HR, two people whose careers may have a certain overlap, are indistinguishable. Except for one of the protagonist's crushes, these four people don't interact much with the protagonist. During the reading process, in addition to trying to distinguish them, you can't help but be confused about the meaning of setting them. Finally, Community 17 seems to be forming a harmonious micro-society, but it always gives me a sense of violation and unreality, reminding me of the Biosphere 2 experiment conducted in the desert in the United States. One of the troubles in the reading process was that I could not be convinced and expected the world view set by the author. Generally speaking, it is considered to be above average and can be given five stars, but I personally ended up staying in the country of the plutocrats.

It's very interesting. It's a rare battle of wits. It made me use my brain to open a small window to calculate, record data, and record pictures and text. I'm stupid, so it was extremely difficult to memorize the rules of each chapter. However, the game reflects reality and is still very deep.

At first I was attracted by the battle of wits, but after reading more than 200 chapters, I feel that each story is becoming more and more homogeneous. They are based on mathematical logic and lack a sense of fun. At the same time, each game is often divided into two stages, each with several rules. One game has only ten rules. It seems too tiring, but the game Often hiding some decisive rules makes victory in the game less fulfilling, and the setting of the story seems quite strange at the moment. After more than 200 chapters, I still don't see the use of the community. It doesn't feel as interesting as the lone wolf. It's just the big brother forcing the younger brother to lead. I haven't read many novels of the same type, and there aren't many thriller games that have impressed me. Toka I feel that these two are more interesting in terms of story or wit content.

The supporting characters are indeed a bit brainless. The last two games (Coward and Fertility) are not very good. Everyone is breaking the law. Why do some people just leave the river without even a chance to choose? Why kill them? The sinners in the first game all have a chance to survive. In these two games, there is no chance at all. Just look at Jiang, what's your intention? But it's very interesting. This book writes about social phenomena such as the relationship between men and women. It's very interesting. Haha, this kind of book is really interesting.

This book has a very deep logic, and most of the characters have online IQs. Thank you very much to the author for the fact that as a reader I can learn a lot from this. The story is also very interesting, and the switching of different characters' perspectives is also very smooth. From this we can see that the author's writing style and writing skills are very deep. Good book. My only worry is that the layout of this book is a bit big. According to my experience in reading books over the years, a book with such a high intention may not be able to be read later. Let's look forward to the author's performance.