Nanyang Fengyun 1864

What is the concept of the British Empire in the Victorian era plus the Second French Empire? The world's strongest navy plus the world's strongest army. Here we are a group of refugees who only eat and drink every day and are learning industrial technology, and their minds are full of feudal ideas. It is even more outrageous than African countries defeating the United States. Man, you really don't know about Great Britain in the Victorian era. Even Napoleon was playing around, and his IQ crushed the Qing Dynasty. The number one in the industrial world was basically full of military points and full population points. , Resource points are full, and the most important diplomatic points are Great Britain.

There is no thought, and industrialization completed by relying on feudal ideas and systems. How can a country defeat Britain like this? Do you have any theory? A group of illiterate people under your command are competing with people who have gone through modern universities in the West. Are you kidding me? How can your soldiers accept such a high casualty rate, and they are not protecting the homeland. Even if they are attacked, China at that time People with feudal ideas and small peasant ideas can have such high consciousness. The speech is for people who understand the country and the nation. If you are talking to a group of people who have only done farm work before and want to be better every day, what do they know? Your mobilization level is too high. The Soviet Union's mobilization can't catch up with you, and the quality of the soldiers is comparable to the gray animals of Tsarist Russia.

All this is done to grab islands. Do you expect these scattered islands to become a big country? Look at how a big country can become a big country without a continent on its own territory, even if the British sun does not set now? A temporary prosperity does not last long. At that time, there were several continents in the world, including South America, Australia, Africa, and no one belonged to them. They rushed to grab a piece of development. They were doing things east and west every day, and they only knew how to grab small islands. There was no long-term planning. The pattern was too small. Even in modern times, they still used the feudal dynasty. The government structure was neither foreign nor foreign, nor ancient nor modern, nor ancient and modern, nor the present. It looked distorted.

1. The protagonist has traveled through time for several years and his family is rich. Why not develop technology? 2. When the protagonist gets money, he buys a gun. If you don't make it, will you buy it again when you run out of bullets? 3. I have traveled through time and have been a soldier for several years. I don't know how to train myself, so I hired British instructors. 4. If you want to go to sea to build a country, is the protagonist ready to develop agriculture? If you can't make guns, you can't train iron.

Author, can you update this book until it is finished? Don't give it to the first few anymore. I will stop updating after less than 500,000 words.

After occupying northern Vietnam and Hainan around 1880, Hongji Coal Mine and Shilu Iron Mine were perfect for building a coal-iron complex. The 19th and 20th centuries were the era of iron and coal.

The founding of the Chinese nation in Nanyang itself is an extremely unreasonable essay. It has the same nature as the aid document. The Chinese Nanyang Jianwen basically abandoned rationality for the sake of political correctness, at least not writing anything after 1840. Britain will not allow a hostile and uninvited guest to stand on this soil. And many times, the author has a lot of countries, but he doesn't look for allies. Then, the overall level is not that good. He is very backward and weak, but he dares to confront others head-on, does not give others face, and can still win. The development speed is very ridiculous, just for the sake of fun. If this is the case, then just write an imaginary military article that is cool. Why apply it to the real world? For an extremely weak tribe that is not a country at all, it will take at least 70 to 80 years to become a great power. It is basically impossible for the entire country to become stronger in one generation, and the protagonist's social environment is not good at all. I think in essence, articles like the aid to the Communist Party are basically from the period of the Anti-Japanese War. Some people especially like to read articles about the Anti-Japanese War, but I don't find them interesting. Because in essence, there was nothing to overturn in the War of Resistance Against Japan, and the gap in strength was obvious. Even if you were sitting in the position of the top leader, you would not be able to overturn the situation. No, what tactics can you use or what? Got it, don't take the photos from the anti-Japanese drama as real. It is impossible for Japan's President Su Li to win a duel with China. Even if all tactics are used, it is just to delay as much as possible, and it is impossible to achieve real victory. What's more, some people are just a small person, making small changes in local forms, or even getting spy information. It was always fun, it was always fun, and it kept trapping the other side, but in the end, the war of resistance still lasted 14 years. So what is the key to your enjoyment? It feels great all the time, but then the result is that I keep putting off and quitting. It feels outrageous. If you want to make a comeback, you have to cheat, which loses its basic meaning. Then there is no need to apply it to the real world. So I hope to choose a position that can make a comeback or be reasonable. Some people write an imperfect ending, which is also full of hardships and not smooth, instead of always being happy, always happy, always tortured, always tortured, and finally back to the starting point. I think this is very bad and very retarded. The first step is to choose a good subject, not political correctness. Of course, I am not the author. I only provide opinions. Of course, my opinions are not spiritual. I am just expressing my opinions. After all, it is not easy for the author to write this kind of thing. I also hope that the author can be more interesting so that I can read it. I am not saying this is just my opinion, this is my opinion. Don't be happy for the sake of being happy. I'll give this book a five-star rating. It feels so immoral to give it a low rating after talking about it for so long that it makes people angry. The author also needs to eat. Not much to say, this is what I think.

No matter how you read it, I think it is a cool article. The system is a feudal autocratic monarchy, the economy is not a free economy, and the culture is a group of uneducated citizens. When they came to found the country, they fell in love with the United Kingdom. India and South Asia are the weak points of the British. The United Kingdom prefers Germany to unify Europe and Tsarist Russia to rule most of Eurasia. They do not want a powerful country to emerge in Southeast Asia. In Southeast Asia, the navy does not need supplies to directly attack India. It is equivalent to the overlord of the British Empire being allowed by the Chu State. This is stronger than nuclear weapons.

Combined with the geographical location of the Chu State at that time, several industries could be vigorously planned and developed in advance: the electric power industry, especially the electric lighting industry; internal combustion engines and subsequent automobiles and airplanes; rubber and its products; sucrose; wireless telegraphy and telephones; cameras and photographic equipment; the pharmaceutical industry, including antibiotics such as penicillin and various prescriptions collected from the mainland and made into tablets according to Western medicine; the chemical industry based on petroleum and coal synthesized various chemical products such as textiles, fertilizers, explosives, new materials, etc.

Very good, I especially hope the protagonist's attitude towards the indigenous people,