From Austria to the Empire on Which the Sun Never Sets

The Pope and the Internal Affairs of the Empire First of all, regarding the Pope, the previous integration of the Papal State into the Empire seems to me to be quite a poisonous point. The Holy See and the Roman Empire are two institutions. If you control these two, you can basically dominate Europe. To control the Holy See, you must control the Pope, and to control the Pope, you must place the Pope under the emperor. But the author's method seems too strange to me. The most important thing for the Pope is the appointment of bishops and the title of Vicar of Christ. Therefore, to control the Pope and even the Holy See, you only need to do a good job in this aspect. Regarding episcopal investiture, the author's separation of the Austrian diocese from the bishop of Salzburg is a strategy, but I think it can be done better. One of the papal titles is called Patriarch of the West, and didn't the protagonist take over most of the territory in the Balkan Peninsula? Why not support an Eastern Patriarch to manage religious affairs in the Balkans and integrate the power of the former Eastern Roman Empire? Of course, the Eastern Patriarchate here is not trying to revive the Orthodox Church, but a Catholic Eastern Patriarchate. In fact, the two major churches are already under the threat of the Ottomans, and they are almost there. The protagonist should work hard and absorb the power of the original Orthodox Church. Supporting an Eastern Patriarch can divide the power of the Pope and regain the right to appoint bishops that originally belonged to the emperor in the East. In addition, to weaken the influence of the Pope, the protagonist can also ask the Pope to give up his arrogant title: Representative of Christ, and return to the original Representative of St. Peter. This requires the emperor to be strong and powerful enough. At the same time, the emperor can also take back the title of high priest belonging to the Roman emperor and become the representative of Christ. As for the affairs of the Holy See, after getting the title, it is okay to let the Pope continue to manage it as the supreme leader. It just needs to separate a few patriarchs, such as the original five patriarchs, to balance it so that the protagonist can have better control. What is necessary to make the Papal State directly merge into the empire? Secondly, when dealing with imperial affairs, I think it is more important to have a few allies who are powerful but cannot threaten the emperor compared to a scattered empire. For example, Bavaria. A unified Bavaria is definitely better than a fragmented Bavaria. Even if Bavaria is unified, it will not threaten the emperor. The strength of the two is not on the same level. Bavaria, surrounded on three sides, should be a natural ally of the emperor. And why a unified Bavaria? This is to integrate the power of the empire. There are too many voices in the empire. It will be better to make reforms after the empire is merged. Directly subdue a few powerful ones, and directly swallow up the rest if they resist.

This book has a congenital flaw, which does not mean that the author's writing skills will change. It is a congenital flaw in this book. The world background it writes and the author's choice of identity itself mean that this book is a book with a super niche type of subject matter. This is even more eccentric than ordinary foreign history. Why do you say that? This is content written by the author. What I feel is that the history of the plot and the political system itself in the author's novel are very awkward, because as the author himself said, the protagonist often needs to execute different political orders in different places for administrative purposes. This is very counter-intuitive. Intuition is what we have always accepted, that is, the emperor issues orders from the center to the local areas, but this is different. The protagonist has to go to various capitals to issue orders, and then can issue different orders in different places, because the local special political system determines this. This is very stupid, you know, it is just like that. I like to watch the rise of Spain, the rise of Austria in the 19th century, and the rise of Africa. I have never read this book. The rise of Austria is so bumpy and troublesome. It gives me a feeling. Anyway, it is very similar to a reader's comment. Didn't he comment in the comment area? The saying that food is tasteless and it is a pity to throw it away really hits the mark. This congenital defect has caused this novel to become a bit unorthodox. To be honest, this book, which is so unorthodox, can still be on the list. It is actually of good quality. This has inversely demonstrated how awesome this book is, haha.

Although I give this book a five-star recommendation, it does not mean that I support everyone or those who like to read about foreign history. As far as Amway is concerned, this book is very interesting. Books in my personal eyes are different from books in the eyes of others. After all, everyone has their own worldview. It is impossible to say that the books I like must be accepted by others. This is unrealistic. Of course, the reason why I recommend this book and give it a five-star rating, uh, the five-star rating in this comment area is because although the author of this book writes a novel, he is a member, which means that the membership is free, and the author himself does not have the idea of ​​making money, or the idea of ​​making money was not born in the early days. He did not write this book with the intention of making money. At least in the beginning, in this case, he was able to write a novel of good quality and ensure its update speed. I personally think that the author is a talented and personable person. This is why I insist on recommending this author. I personally think that writing skills and other things can be practiced, but character and other things are more difficult to change. I think that although this author only regards writing novels as a hobby, he may only write one novel, and may not write the second or third novel, but at least in this one I have seen too much, which is really great. And the writing style of his novels is also good. Of course, it is not without shortcomings, but in terms of positive correction, I think it is very consistent with the attitude of a young man, which is really great. I still remember the author's first chapter. In the writer's words, he said that he seemed to have written a bug at the beginning, and then corrected it. Some of the words afterward were the writer's words. There were often some statements of his own in it. It was very lively. I think it is very good. I think this author's character is really good for now. It's great, because I regard it as this book - he only wrote this book, and I read his book. I personally think that his writing attitude is a kind of devotion to writing novels. Although maybe he just treats it as a hobby, it is the kind of attitude that I can feel, but I can feel it. I don't know how to describe it. Anyway, I like this attitude very much. It's useless to say more. I've gone through this first, and then I'll talk about its shortcomings. This book is not without its shortcomings. Some readers said that the author was very deliberate in writing the plot of the war for the first time, because I seemed to jump a little bit at the time, so I didn't feel much. But I think it depends on personal feelings. I don't like reading comments from readers of foreign history, because once I read the comments, it is easy to be swayed by the comments of readers. Especially for me, a person who is not a history major, I am really easily influenced by others. People are biased, so I might as well take the author's words as a guideline. As long as there are no contradictions in the content of the author's novel, then I won't say anything: Hey, the content of your novel is different from the reference in reality. Why, I won't say that, because I have never majored in history, so I am too lazy to comment on this aspect, and I don't want readers to interfere with me by commenting on this aspect, so I usually block the comments from those readers. Anyway, blocking is very simple, just click on the upper right corner. And what the author is better at when writing novels is grand narratives. Maybe the author likes to play games, and the ones in the games are more grand, and there are no such micro things, and it is because he is not very good at writing novels. Because usually when writing a novel, it doesn't mean that the grander the better, because the more grand it is, you have to highlight its micro aspects in order to compare its grandness. However, the author is not very good at using other people's perspectives to write some micro stories, so the overall content of the novel sometimes seems very empty. Although written like this, it certainly promotes the development of the plot, but the plot is not procrastinating. I think this is good, but sometimes it can be very empty. For example, once you get here and go down, you don't know how much time it is. It passes in one go, and then it is like that, and then that, so what, it is just that, there are no micro details, you don't know what it is like, there is no real feeling, you know, it is very empty. Just like when you are playing a game, you click on an option, and then the option starts to advance, and then it fast-forwards to you making the next choice, or jumping out of a certain event, and what happens next, but you can't see some people under this event, what tragic fate happened to them, or whatever, but sometimes the author didn't write it, and sometimes the writing was good. That is to say, it's not that he didn't write it, but that there are some places that he didn't write. For example, when the author was writing about the protagonist reforming some political systems within the empire, these were briefly mentioned. In fact, I can understand it, because when writing novels about this kind of thing, the most taboo thing is what you don't understand. If you write it in great detail, the experience it takes will be easily criticized, and it may need to be greatly improved. Alas, this is actually very contradictory, but I don't read many foreign historical articles, but they also write about some ordinary people from a micro perspective, and their lives are getting better and better or what happened due to the protagonist's decree, and then there is a sense of reality, which is not bad. In fact, I think the author can add this, but I just saw the testimonials on the shelves. I don't have to point fingers because I don't know if the author will improve in the future.

How can I put it, this book is worthless and a pity to discard. I have never seen a foreign history written like this, and the protagonist's presence is very low. In other words, he really changed some things, but the author made the protagonist have a very low sense of existence. The protagonists written by some people may have been using various strategies to change things behind the scenes, but the protagonist of this book seems to have conquered Bohemia and then conquered some things, but he seems a bit introverted and cowardly. It feels a bit like boiled water. For example, when Sparta resists the Persians, other authors will write about what they experienced in the middle, and then what efforts the protagonist went through. Anyway, it has all the excitement and climax that it should have. This book is about Sparta resisting the Persians, and then going through a war, well, it's over.

It is recommended to refer to the Holy Roman Empire and I was a crown prince in France. This does not mean that it cannot be written from a national perspective, but the protagonist must have a sense of existence, otherwise there will be no sense of substitution and it will be too bland.

I'm so excited to see it, I'm going to play Europa Universalis 4 right away😘

How shameless, I just hope the author doesn't want eunuchs😘

The most important thing for Austria is the integration of nationalities. If the integration had started a few centuries earlier, it would not have been reduced to rubbish.

In the future, I think we should cancel the various crowns, unify them into one Austrian crown, and then assimilate the culture, language and writing.

I just discovered that since I started playing P Club, my first player was basically Habsburg, Crusader Kings 3 was the Count of Allgäu, and Europa Universalis was Austria. European male protagonists (of course not in Crusader Kings)