The Witcher at Hogwarts

Many people join the protagonist directly and don't think it is a mistake. All three perspectives follow the protagonist. . . Like Tang San fans, you still say you don't want to be black but you still need to be black? ?

The writing is weird, not like The Witcher or Hogwarts. Most of the content is just a retelling of some settings that all readers basically know.

This protagonist has a bit of a strong taste, even the centaurs...

I first started reading this book because I wanted to read books related to Hogwarts. After typing in "Hogwarts", this book appeared. I clicked on it out of curiosity and found out that I had found a treasure. Entering Hogwarts as a "witcher" is something that many people did not expect. Although compared to wizards, witchers are like cannons and pistols, the systems are similar and can be considered acceptable. Judging from the content I have seen so far, the protagonist may bring a group of demon hunters and Voldemort he has cultivated to fight hard, feeling sorry for Tom for a second... But let me tell you, this Voldemort should not be the final boss. After all, the power of the wizarding world is very different from that of the demon hunters. Maybe Voldemort can't stand it if the protagonist shows a little bit of strength. Well, my personal opinion, I hope the author will take a look. Above.

There is a section where Death Eaters transform into black smoke and members of the Order of the Phoenix transform into white smoke to fight. For example, Tonks showed this magic. Have you considered letting the protagonist learn this spell? To overcome the witcher's weaknesses?

Brother, may I ask who the heroine is?

I'm annoyed by the idea that Dumbledore would use telekinesis indiscriminately on people, especially when using it on a protagonist who doesn't know his strength. It seems that Dumbledore is very intelligent, and it also makes this article very stupid.

Those who have never played The Witcher will have no difficulty reading this novel. The author is not very good at hydrology, which is reflected in the fact that many scenes that can be inserted into a large amount of dialogue are directly narrated in one paragraph. The advantage is that the pace is tight and not procrastinating, but the disadvantage is that it is difficult to express the characters' personalities. The protagonist is calm and powerful, but not brainless. He generally follows the development of the plot, but has inserted secondary content in the middle. The inserted part is not closely connected with the original work, but there is no sense of inconsistency. The protagonist has inherited the pile driver physique of the witcher. In fact, it is quite possible whether he lets himself go on pile driving or has an affair with a little girl, but Tonks is added as the heroine. This character was very thinly portrayed in the original work, worse than Qiu. No reader would have any illusions about him? The insertion of the plot is also very stiff and a complete burden. Many times it is described for the sake of description, which delays other emotional lines. It is a pure failure... The flaws do not hide the good points. The overall reading is very comfortable, not rigid, not procrastinating, not abrupt, not dark.

It was well written. After spending the night with the centaur lady, I was ready to withdraw. Maybe I am still conservative. According to my understanding, the centaurs in Harry Potter cannot be transformed into human form. I can accept the transformation and breeding, and the forced sex after being unable to transform. I feel that this heart is somewhat big, and it can hold anything.

If a centaur and a witcher have a child, should they name it horse hunter?