Scum of the World of Cultivation

I'll beat the dog to death for your beginning! Goodbye, don't watch anymore!

Because they had shared weal and woe, the comrades even sold their own houses in order to treat Guo Jianjun's mother. They got tens of thousands of dollars from the sale, but it was still not enough to treat her mother, which was quite helpless.

Alas, the protagonist gave the girl he liked to his subordinates to play with, and even listened to the girl's moans as she was raped. The protagonist was overjoyed. The harder the fuck inside, the happier the protagonist will be, and all kinds of dirty talk. Tsk tsk tsk, it's terrible, just like that, all three views are gone. The Scum of the Cultivation World is the most amazing online article I have ever seen.

Guo Jianjun's father passed away in his second year as a soldier because his family had no money to treat him. Because he was looking forward to his success, he did not tell Guo Jianjun before he left. It's also a pity for the parents in the world!

You killed the dog for no reason. How ruthless are you? Chapter 1: The dog saved the male protagonist's body twice. You were surprised to write that the male protagonist killed the dog for no reason.

This dog is affectionate and righteous, why is it so ruthless? No, why is it so ruthless? I can't stand it. The protagonist is ruthless and ruthless. No matter what I say later, it is impossible to change this setting. Even if the performance is good, when I think about the beginning, I feel that it is just fake.

I feel like the good reviews are all written by trolls. The first 300 chapters of the book are still readable, but as you go towards the end, it becomes less humane and the outlook on the book becomes more and more unhealthy! Garbage, completely different from what I thought!

This article is for a girl, the protagonist is a beauty, the kind who likes the protagonist very much. Because he didn't follow the protagonist's thoughts without understanding the protagonist's background, he was given to his subordinate by the protagonist and gave birth to a baby. The protagonist is still single. I watched the pirated version

I read this book many years ago, and the reviews of this book are also very polarized. Some say that the protagonist is perverted, a giveaway, a loser, and has no bottom line. Others say that the killing is decisive, very realistic, and the character is clear. In fact, the author has always emphasized one thing from the title to the introduction to the opening chapter, "a scum, a notorious death row prisoner, who has committed all crimes except treason." Do you expect such a person to stand on the side of righteousness and justice? The characters are clearly laid out right in front of the readers, but no one pays attention to them. In the opening chapter, the protagonist kills a dog to save him, and many people can't stand it. This is exactly what the author reminds you, the protagonist is like this, there is no bottom line. Then there is the protagonist who forces his younger brother to watch him kill someone to train his younger brother. Isn't it very perverted? But if you really know a real death row prisoner who doesn't take crime seriously, you think this is really too holy. In short, with just one sentence, many people did not take the author's introduction seriously and thought it was just a beak. If you bury your head and look directly, the result will be tragic To put it bluntly, the author just wrote the story of a perverted, crazy and bottomless death row prisoner who came to the world of immortality to cultivate immortality. So I would like to advise everyone, when you first start watching the movie, don't take the protagonist into an ideal role in your mind. Just pretend you are watching a crime documentary about a crazy murderer. Maybe someone will say I'm crazy, is that necessary? I came here to read just to see a crazy murderer? But the fact is that the title of the author's book and the introduction clearly tell you that this is about a crazy murderer. There is absolutely no need to click in if you don't like it. If you click in and feel unbearable, you will directly start trolling the author. Whose is it?

This is not a book written now. Why should I criticize it? It was very good 6 or 7 years ago. Of course, it doesn't matter now. After all, the jokes have been ruined. Is the first online article you read still interesting to you now?