Writer 1979: I Work as a Concierge at the Normal University

The introduction and title of the book are enough to read, but when you click on the first three chapters, you will be stunned. A little janitor asked you to write like a principal, and the author's protagonist is inconsistent. The previous article said that the original author can control it without smoking. Next, I will focus on the few puffs of cigarettes that the protagonist smokes. Why did you write this plot? Actively screen readers? I had to read dozens or hundreds of chapters before I couldn't stand the previous book. I didn't expect that you, the author of this book, are so amazing that you couldn't stand it in the first three chapters.

I still don't believe that the comments in the comment section are about poisoning in the first chapter. When I see that it's really the first chapter, I write that I don't smoke. Then I talk about how uncomfortable it is for Ma Liu to take over the cigarette and still keep smoking. It doesn't matter whether he smokes or not. The key is to attack yourself and create conflicts. There is no need to write like this. Hardcore people should persuade them to quit. 😗

First: In 1979, how good were the doormen, and whether there would be electric fans. Answer: If the guards had a staff at that time, they would be very good. . For example, everyone knows that workers dared to chase and fight the factory director. Ahem, cough, cough, the principal has no right to fire the janitor in his position. . Those who have read rebirth novels may have the impression that no matter how awesome the protagonist is, he still has to take out a cigarette or say something nice to the doorman. Ahem, the tough guy is the doorman. Whether the guard had an electric fan - first of all, there was no distinction between high and low labor at that time, and the guard staff and the professor staff were equal. If there were electric fans in other offices, then it was very reasonable for the guard post to have an electric fan. . Ahem, don't equate the doormen of the past with the security guards of today. . . . Second: The slow poem written by the author is really poisonous. . At that time, from scar literature to romance to hazyness, the quality of literature was fundamental: there was no standard. Being dim in scars is heresy, and vice versa. The author of this poem. . Ahem, cough, cough, really so-so, so-so, so-so. . .

I didn't finish the first chapter, so I canceled it. The author is a long-time smoker, and it's boring to write a smoking plot.

Advantages: The writing style is okay. If I don't focus on the details, it won't be too inconsistent. The copying part is still okay. Disadvantages: First of all, the main point that attracts me to this book is the copying of the text, but the copying becomes less and less as you go to the end. There are even no new novels for more than 100 chapters. After 200 chapters, it turns to the commercial film and television version of foreign novels. Moreover, there are too many life plots, especially love plots, and it will turn into a period romance novel. The more I read it, the more I can't stand it.

The first poem shocked me. Mu Xin's "Slow in the Past" reminds me of the seventies and eighties in the seventies and eighties. Such poems seem a bit interesting today, but they were really not outstanding at the time.

The comments in the comment section are all about other people's positive comments. It's quite disgusting. A literary giant's period piece is written in a mess, and his emotions are even more messy.

Originally it was a good read, but the author always praised and criticized Chen Kaige over and over again. I was really speechless! Chen Dajun doesn't even read your book. Is it worth kneeling down and licking it like this?

I came to QQ to read it from the starting point. I think it is very well written.

The protagonist seems to be a monk, with no desires or desires.