My Era 1979!

The author's writing style is very good and the writing is in line with 1979. But: The three views are not correct, and it is full of the disgusting atmosphere of the literati being superior. Reasons for incorrect views: Facing the college entrance examination, a time-traveler, or a time-traveler who is known as a cultural person, actually thinks of writing a novel to get a recommendation to enter the university, and regards the recommendation to enter the university as the right path. So, if you say recommendation is the right path as stated in the article, what does the college entrance examination count? Is this an insult to you as a literary person who can write articles? If you can write articles, are you qualified to take the college entrance examination? The condescension of the literati: After the protagonist traveled through time, he learned that Xinghua liked his original self before time travel. Faced with Xinghua's love, he did not refuse or explain, but instead used Xinghua's love to make her own profits (at that time, paper and pen were hard-won, and Xinghua gave them to him). After using Xinghua's stuff with peace of mind, I actually wrote: After all, she and I are not the same person, but in two different worlds. . . I just laughed. The four words "shameless" are described in such a beautiful and refined way. The article written by the protagonist: about farmers. . . Purpose of writing: to break away from the peasants. . . . It is really hard for me to imagine how noble a soul is needed to be able to eulogize the greatness of the peasants and at the same time want to use this eulogy to break away from the peasants. . . This is my first time giving one star. In the past, I always gave five stars to encourage writers no matter how bad their writing skills were. But this author's views are really shattered.

The author's political sensitivity is really poor. I have also written novels myself. Anyway, I did not dare to write about the "household contract system" in 1979. The struggle between reform and conservatism is not something that a person who can only write novels can participate in. It would be easy to be broken into pieces.

It's only 500,000 words, and I've seen it come up for free three times. I really don't understand that such a rubbish book is still taking up resources if I rewrite it.

The author needs to learn more about the life of that era. Many of the contents are literal and false. Take the "Zhenliang" you mentioned several times as an example. It is not cotton and linen cloth, but chemical fiber. It does not require cloth stamps, and cloth stamps are not universal in various provinces and cities. There are many similar situations, which are simply unbelievable.

It's really good😌There are few books that can be read with close attention to the Three Views. 1. Describes the world of literature. It's good for expanding my world view. I know absolutely nothing about literature, at least not at all now. 2. Comparatively praise self-improvement, perseverance and optimism. This is more comfortable😌. Anyway, it makes me more comfortable than the kind of success school that emphasizes efficiency. Just like working overtime, I only accept the internal drive and refuse to be whipped by the environmental system. 3. The concentration of patriotism is relatively high. In fact, my values ​​​​are closer to liberals and selfish, and I belong to the side of the public intellectuals who were beaten in the book. However, I like to see this part of being beaten, just like I hate smashing Japanese cars of my own people and then saying patriotic. I see a lot of opposition arising from differences in outlook. I hope the author can persist. There are still readers who accept the differences and like them, such as me.

If you want to write about literary theory, then write seriously about literary theory. This kind of nondescript stuff also contains private stuff.

At this time when the author wrote, You should check more information. There are many things that the protagonist, an ordinary person, cannot participate in

My fault, I didn't see the word original, no wonder I couldn't stand it! If there is no sense of immersion in the original work, it means it is not enjoyable. In the past, I would just read the introduction and read the book directly! Please give it a good review after watching it for a few minutes. .

It's a bit special to read, but not grounded. It's like floating on the ground. It has a sense of literature and art, but Huazao

The writing is very beautiful and smooth, but it feels very awkward and out of place. The content is so vague that I didn't know what to write after listening to it for a long time.