We Agreed to Develop Xiaoxiaole, but What the Hell is the Earth War About?

At the beginning of the novel, the protagonist is given a character who doesn't understand the game at all. I thought there was some foreshadowing, but it turns out that the author has replaced himself. The design of the game is pure shit. The garbage time for character death and other resurrections is enough for the whole game. During this period, if you die, you are not allowed to quit and restart automatically. You have to wait for the whole game to be completed, and you are still matched with 500 people in a game. Players who have played Chicken Chicken know that as long as they die, they will quit and restart. If there are teammates who will find ways to make teammates cheat, who will let you watch the whole game? It's not about watching a game. Who can watch strangers play a whole game? There are teammates who don't even want to watch their teammates play if they die. There are a lot of people playing with their phones with their heads down. What's more, some people just want to play by themselves. There are many people who never watch the game. When playing LoL and being defeated, some people will hang up or click surrender. They don't want to continue the garbage time. Some people just don't want to waste time and have to wait for the whole game. It's pure garbage settings. Time cost is also a cost, okay, wasting the player's time cost so casually will only become a roadblock. The author obviously really doesn't understand games and is not writing about games. No wonder he gave the protagonist a character who doesn't understand games. Any author who has played the game himself would not design it like this. It is a purely unnatural design. This novel was either written by AI or by a person who has never played the game. You, the author, don't play games yourself and you write a game article. Neither a scientific article requires the author to have much scientific theoretical knowledge nor a historical article requires the author to at least read history books. When did the requirements for game articles become so low?

I looked at it and couldn't stand it anymore Looking at the setting of the first game, the Normandy landings increased the firepower of the opponent ten times. In a head-on confrontation, you can survive for twenty minutes, and 500 can survive 300. After friendly support, the opponent still has half the firepower. Is this kind of game competitive in the context of the setting? There is no super-environmental technology, no more gameplay, and no plot. The project effect is just a gift. You told me to take this thing to participate in the competition, and from the background, the overall game level is not weak. The competition has been running for two hundred years, the opponent has invested 500 million, and the production time of the protagonist is only nine days. There is a system, but let's see if the early effect of the system can really meet the requirements of the writing. This is not a question of logic and illogicality. This is purely anti-human. As for the character set up for the protagonist in the actual plot, in one sentence, he can be a normal person, and this reporter, this investor, and this network environment are all gods.

Those who have negative reviews are those who have read too few novels. The old bookworm tells you that the core of this book is to ignore the things on Blue Star and just regard it as the condensed essence of the Earth War movie. The main thing so far is to introduce World War II. Have you not seen Douyin? Things on Blue Star are just for fun. Are you being serious? That's it for reading novels. You have to figure out what is the core. Blue Star is more realistic than Where Are You? There are many more outrageous books than this one. I have been reading novels for 14 years and I almost never stop reading them every day. This one is considered acceptable for this genre. There are also parallel earth literature writing LOL, which one is more fake and also It is not realistic at all to create it on the spot while riding a horse. This is written for you by the computing power of the parallel world. It is simulated by the powerful computing power, and there is also a system. It can be seen that the author is also trying hard to write reality. Those who are clamoring for their own brains to think about how to change it to make it more reasonable, send it out.

I read the first 20 chapters of this book at Qidian, and I really couldn't stand it. It ranks first on the Qidian monthly ticket list and ranks first on the rating list here. It's terrible... The logic is flawed, the ideas are not new, and the writing about the game is really bad. Whether it's Super Mechanic, Losing Money to Become the Richest Man, Bad Game Titan, Avatar, Astartes, etc., These previous games have high scores and high monthly tickets. Not only is the content good, but the key is that the game is also well integrated. And why can't you stand it? Just talking about Beach Landing, there are at least three top games, COD, Medal of Honor, Battlefield 5 single-player campaign, Company of Heroes, and Band of Brothers. At first glance, it's a good guy. For Wushuang, for torturing people, for being ruthless in war, is there anything in the world that is more ruthless than a live pig and cattle slaughtering machine? Looking at it again, the classic touching moments in the game are completely useless. I'm just curious why the score is so high and the monthly ticket is so high? Awesome! Awesome!

Since you have decided to make anti-war a theme, how about making your world background a little better? Because people are too idle and are afraid of starting a war, which is a bit nonsense

Terrible Are there hunger points and delicacies? If so, don't keep writing about developing ancient times, and go back to ancient times and chew tree bark? As for the Soviet Union, people didn't eat black bread or suffer from the cold. I wonder if they have masochism to play? Also, you said that it is easy to copy and imitate, but you cannot imitate the tactical thinking of the famous generals. Does this have anything to do with the people who play the game? It seems that tens of thousands, and most of the 500,000 people are cannon fodder. Does the tactics of the famous generals have something to do with them? Why is it that so many people are attracted to play when being a cannon fodder is not even fun? The storyline is not good just because of the writing. The setting is not set yet, so how can we go on to it?

It's just a novelty, I won't want to watch it anymore

It's a big mess, the plot is incoherent, and it's always watered down. I wrote about World War II and wrote about Chinese history for me. You must be sick. If you write about Chinese history, you might as well just write about the Eastern Front. At least the content will not be too abrupt. In addition, the author is a military illiteracy. I can't tell the difference between the assault craft and the landing craft in front. The TM Tiger blew away the turret of the opposite tank and still survived. He also shot the Blue Star Superman on the body of the flying turret and even just lost too much blood. It's fun. Why is it so difficult to fight with such a superhuman physique? According to the human body strength of this hard-to-carry artillery shell, it was pushed flat, okay.

If it continues to be written at the current level, if there is no divine book this year, this book may really be number one in the rankings in 25 years.

I have read so many similar books, and I am the first to write something. I can definitely continue writing like this. Good luck to the author.