
Farmers of the Shu Han Dynasty
by Jia Qing
About This Novel
This story tells the story of an ordinary poor man who struggled hard and worked hard to farm in the troubled times of the Three Kingdoms.
What Readers Think
Rating
Community(0)
Official(157)Scraped 22d ago
Overall it's ok, could I ask a few questions?
Personally, I feel that it is generally okay, and it is above average in terms of traveling through history. But there are several problems, 1. Nanxiang, Liangzhou, Hanxinghui, with so much personal control, how could the superiors not be jealous and other ministers not give advice, especially since you still have multiple wives and concubines with you. You also have a lot of cultural achievements, a knight errant leader, an economy, and a military government. You should know the taboos. 2. It's rare for a novel to elevate the status of a female character so high, but there are military and political affairs in Nanxiang, and you reuse your wives and concubines, as well as Nanxiang's disciples and Yaomei, and they don't have enough official positions. Isn't this just using a public weapon for private use? 3. You didn't say what structure you have for Nanxiang, such as the secretariat and the Xinghan Association. With such great rights and interests, are you not afraid of corruption? 4. The female characters are portrayed too hard. Facing other wives and concubines, Guan San is actually tougher on the pig's feet. You are a real tiger. Where does Zhang Si's wisdom come from? For women in ancient times, you started running around to take power at the age of fifteen or six. Return to Zhuge. Her vision and insight are as good as those of the protagonist. . . .
fifty cents
As the title states, this book is becoming increasingly unreadable. How can you, an Internet writer, praise foreign Marxism and Lenin so much?
Is the author really studying mechanics?
If the protagonist in the book really studies mechanics, he must be dawdling around. Otherwise, a blower should not be so complicated
I can only say that it is average
The protagonist is the brainless 250. Look at the descriptions. He thinks he is Zhao Guang's brother-in-law. When he heard about the appointment with Zhuge Liang, the first thing he thought of was disappointment? Then the Hermitage Gate was called a loser by the protagonist? So awesome?
This Shu Han farmer should be a leader in the history books!
As a time-travel history book, the protagonist of this book has neither a system nor a golden finger. But his logic is harmonious and his IQ is online. There is no brainless slap in the face or any pretentiousness. It's not like the three views are completely destroyed and the villain is forced to lose his wisdom. Save Shu Han starting from the cultivated land, highly recommended!
Liu Bei, inspirational life
Nowadays, many people say that Liu Bei is hypocritical and likes Cao Cao, but throughout the ages, there have been countless Cao Cao, and Liu Bei has only a few, who are half a hundred years old, can still create a country, can pretend to be benevolent and righteous for a lifetime, even if they are fake, they can become true. It is so difficult!
Too much explanation
There are too many explanations, and it always feels like the readers are being treated as fools to make them understand what it means, and the pace is also slow.
It's not refreshing enough to watch
As a time traveler, as a scholar, as a scholar who doesn't want to be an official, he is just like a veteran who hangs out in officialdom. If you just casually write a few books on Capital or The Wealth of Nations, or come up with a few random things, the emperor will have to curry favor with you. You are still afraid of this and that. Can Zhuge Liang kill you? Even if you don't hate him, he will support you if he has any knowledge. If you don't bother to open up the mathematical principles of natural philosophy, you will be canonized directly. Kong Laoer won't even be able to carry your shoes. As long as an individual always demands an explanation for everything in the world, even if the explanation is flawed, even if it is unreasonable, even if he appeals to non-existent gods, even an old farmer who farms the land will want to know what the shape of the earth is, what shape the sky is, even if it has nothing to do with the land he farms, and even if he knows this, he can't eat. For example, if the truth of the world is a high mountain in the distance, ancient people's understanding of the world was to stand at the foot of the mountain and guess the beauty of the mountain, while the scientific thinking of modern science is the ladder that can climb the mountain. Conjecture, experiment, induction, and summary are all things that people today take for granted, but in the eyes of ancient people, they were thankless. In ancient times, when two people argued, words like "How do you prove what you said? What kind of experiments did you do? How many samples did you have?" Would never appear. Indian monks are so stupid that they can argue about how many pots are spinning around the sun. Are they stupid? Ancient China did not have a formal logical system and did not know the razor theory. In fact, if a modern person brings scientific thinking to ancient people, ancient people will be able to develop a scientific system on their own. If only technology is provided, ancient people will still not be able to evolve themselves and develop a scientific system. Let me ask you, is it difficult for such an awesome modern person to live a better life? If a leader is not a fool, will he make things difficult for this awesome person? He doesn't fight for power, and he doesn't want to harm anyone. Why not be awesome? He should be awesome. Not only would ancient people not think you were wrong, they would also think of ways to find reasons for you, saying that you are right because you are awesome.
hehe
First, you should change the title of your novel What do you want to express in the first 20 chapters? Can you commit suicide? The supporting character's IQ is online, but the pig's feet are not there. You can do it. Inventing, teaching, and pretending to be awesome, I wish I could be hacked to death when I go out
Rating
Community(0)
Official(157)Scraped 22d ago
Overall it's ok, could I ask a few questions?
Personally, I feel that it is generally okay, and it is above average in terms of traveling through history. But there are several problems, 1. Nanxiang, Liangzhou, Hanxinghui, with so much personal control, how could the superiors not be jealous and other ministers not give advice, especially since you still have multiple wives and concubines with you. You also have a lot of cultural achievements, a knight errant leader, an economy, and a military government. You should know the taboos. 2. It's rare for a novel to elevate the status of a female character so high, but there are military and political affairs in Nanxiang, and you reuse your wives and concubines, as well as Nanxiang's disciples and Yaomei, and they don't have enough official positions. Isn't this just using a public weapon for private use? 3. You didn't say what structure you have for Nanxiang, such as the secretariat and the Xinghan Association. With such great rights and interests, are you not afraid of corruption? 4. The female characters are portrayed too hard. Facing other wives and concubines, Guan San is actually tougher on the pig's feet. You are a real tiger. Where does Zhang Si's wisdom come from? For women in ancient times, you started running around to take power at the age of fifteen or six. Return to Zhuge. Her vision and insight are as good as those of the protagonist. . . .
fifty cents
As the title states, this book is becoming increasingly unreadable. How can you, an Internet writer, praise foreign Marxism and Lenin so much?
Is the author really studying mechanics?
If the protagonist in the book really studies mechanics, he must be dawdling around. Otherwise, a blower should not be so complicated
I can only say that it is average
The protagonist is the brainless 250. Look at the descriptions. He thinks he is Zhao Guang's brother-in-law. When he heard about the appointment with Zhuge Liang, the first thing he thought of was disappointment? Then the Hermitage Gate was called a loser by the protagonist? So awesome?
This Shu Han farmer should be a leader in the history books!
As a time-travel history book, the protagonist of this book has neither a system nor a golden finger. But his logic is harmonious and his IQ is online. There is no brainless slap in the face or any pretentiousness. It's not like the three views are completely destroyed and the villain is forced to lose his wisdom. Save Shu Han starting from the cultivated land, highly recommended!
Liu Bei, inspirational life
Nowadays, many people say that Liu Bei is hypocritical and likes Cao Cao, but throughout the ages, there have been countless Cao Cao, and Liu Bei has only a few, who are half a hundred years old, can still create a country, can pretend to be benevolent and righteous for a lifetime, even if they are fake, they can become true. It is so difficult!
Too much explanation
There are too many explanations, and it always feels like the readers are being treated as fools to make them understand what it means, and the pace is also slow.
It's not refreshing enough to watch
As a time traveler, as a scholar, as a scholar who doesn't want to be an official, he is just like a veteran who hangs out in officialdom. If you just casually write a few books on Capital or The Wealth of Nations, or come up with a few random things, the emperor will have to curry favor with you. You are still afraid of this and that. Can Zhuge Liang kill you? Even if you don't hate him, he will support you if he has any knowledge. If you don't bother to open up the mathematical principles of natural philosophy, you will be canonized directly. Kong Laoer won't even be able to carry your shoes. As long as an individual always demands an explanation for everything in the world, even if the explanation is flawed, even if it is unreasonable, even if he appeals to non-existent gods, even an old farmer who farms the land will want to know what the shape of the earth is, what shape the sky is, even if it has nothing to do with the land he farms, and even if he knows this, he can't eat. For example, if the truth of the world is a high mountain in the distance, ancient people's understanding of the world was to stand at the foot of the mountain and guess the beauty of the mountain, while the scientific thinking of modern science is the ladder that can climb the mountain. Conjecture, experiment, induction, and summary are all things that people today take for granted, but in the eyes of ancient people, they were thankless. In ancient times, when two people argued, words like "How do you prove what you said? What kind of experiments did you do? How many samples did you have?" Would never appear. Indian monks are so stupid that they can argue about how many pots are spinning around the sun. Are they stupid? Ancient China did not have a formal logical system and did not know the razor theory. In fact, if a modern person brings scientific thinking to ancient people, ancient people will be able to develop a scientific system on their own. If only technology is provided, ancient people will still not be able to evolve themselves and develop a scientific system. Let me ask you, is it difficult for such an awesome modern person to live a better life? If a leader is not a fool, will he make things difficult for this awesome person? He doesn't fight for power, and he doesn't want to harm anyone. Why not be awesome? He should be awesome. Not only would ancient people not think you were wrong, they would also think of ways to find reasons for you, saying that you are right because you are awesome.
hehe
First, you should change the title of your novel What do you want to express in the first 20 chapters? Can you commit suicide? The supporting character's IQ is online, but the pig's feet are not there. You can do it. Inventing, teaching, and pretending to be awesome, I wish I could be hacked to death when I go out
Featured in 45 Booklists
Official(45)
[Reader Comments] This book is a historical farming flow. The writing style is relaxed and suitable for reading in a leisurely and happy mood, but the writing style is not for beginners, because there are also some discussions on history in the article, reflecting the author's views on history. People who are tired of watching the history of passion can also change their taste.




[Status: Serializing] Book review to be added




My hand shook, I saw it recently




This book is a historical farming stream. The writing style is relaxed and suitable for reading in a leisurely and happy mood, but the writing style is not for beginners, because there are also some discussions on history in the article, reflecting the author's views on history.












