The Rise of Korea in the Warring States Period

It's all nonsense. During the Warring States Period, there were still excuses for war. They would coerce the people into attacking the city. Read the history of the Warring States Period before writing.

Bullshit, South Korea can't rise up during this period. Besides, South Korea has been weak for hundreds of years, how can it be unified? That's bullshit.

South Korea was the weakest among the Warring States Period, with only a few hundred thousand troops, and it was in a place of four wars, without the foundation and strength to dominate the world. As a result, when the protagonist came, he won all the battles and all the strategies, and wrote that the armies and generals of other countries were regarded as idiots.

This is so fake. There is no plot. Ten thousand people died in one hour, it was like killing a pig. Read more.

After reading the beginning, in a South Korea that has long been corrupted, whether it is ministers or soldiers, when faced with danger, their courage is greatly increased with just a few words from the protagonist. It can only be said that it is too natural to dare to challenge a powerful enemy. Moreover, in the Warring States Period, the protagonist speaks in vernacular, which is really not very relevant as a historical text.

This technology tree makes people speechless. These things are really easy to make. There are also the three treasures of horse warfare. Who can give you the confidence to make them? Don't think about the consequences. You know that they are easy to imitate. There are far more cavalry in Qin and Zhao than in Han. Moreover, there are more cavalry outside the Great Wall. Once they learn how to make them, have you thought of the consequences?

One hundred thousand white troops surrounded the 150,000 coalition troops stationed in a favorable location. . . The battle loss was more than two to one. . The siege was nearly two to one. . Did you write too much? It's still my own shabi. In ancient times, fighting relied on courage to fight, and there were many people. Do you watch a lot of TV based on your calculations? Taken for granted scribbling. , And how come the siege battle is also five to one, ten to one, you are superman when you climb the city wall? Then there is the war called "One Thousand Wounded Soldiers" and "Eight Hundred Loss" to oneself. It's funny to have ten thousand people blocked by one trench. In ancient siege battles, people sacrificed their lives to fill the height of the city wall. If fewer people died in the siege than in the defenders, you can look at the Battle of the Wild King's Castle. Are you kidding me? In ancient times, if one-tenth of the enemy was lost in World War II, he would mutiny and flee. Three or four out of ten are super famous generals, and it's funny how they defend their country to death. The Qin State killed people and cut off their ears for the military industry, but they were not invincible. Where is the armor when wearing clothes? Armor was impossible to achieve in ancient times. Even the Han Dynasty could not produce 100,000 armors. Even the Romance of the Three Kingdoms didn't dare to write like that. The Three Kingdoms all wore clothes to fight. In ancient times, the most casualties were wounded soldiers. I don't understand anything and write randomly. Wei Wuzu must have exaggerated. There was so much armor, it was just leather armor at most. The Qin State was not that powerful. It took two days to walk fifty miles in ancient times. In ancient times, it took several months to fight. It was ridiculous to have ten days and a half.

I love it when I think about unifying the six countries and becoming the Korean Empire.

Comment and read every day.

Not much to say, just one word "good"