Honghuang: I Am the Three Pure Ones' Twin Brother, Revered Through the Ages!

Laozi, the Primordial Celestial Venerable, and Tongtian are clearly transformations of Pangu's primordial spirit. According to your logic, the three of them were transformed from the Primordial Purple Qi, which is completely nonsensical. Furthermore, Kunlun Mountain is one of the ancestral veins of the primordial world. You tell me, it ascended from an unnamed mountain range. Did Heaven bestow enlightenment upon Kunlun?

He was already at the early stage of the Great Luo Golden Immortal realm.

Aren't Kunpeng and Blood Ant both Great Luo Golden Immortals?

You don't pay any attention to the background when you write your books! The Dragon-Han Calamity involves the Dragon, Phoenix, and Qilin clans. The Witch-Demon Calamity involves the Witch and Demon clans. It's just a jumbled mess of different things. The description of the Three Pure Ones is also particularly... Flat. Most importantly, could you please replace the "four" in "Four Pure Ones" with a Chinese character? "Four Pure Ones" just breaks the immersion. [Hehe][hehe][hehe]

If you're going to write something like this, you should at least understand the background first. Writing randomly without understanding anything is pointless. Those who haven't tried writing about red stones can give it a shot.

Flaw 1: The entire text is described as having "dim eyes and a dim face," suggesting the book should be titled "Dim." Flaw 2: A minor character has his bone marrow extracted, revealing it to be congenital. How can a mere acquired being extract such innate essence? Flaw 3: The Four Swords of Zhuxian are described as Tongtian's accompanying magical treasures.

To be honest, it's just average. The power levels were completely broken right from the start of this book. The later plot didn't break out of that mold, so it wasn't good. The overall pacing was handled fairly well, but it was simply beyond saving.

The book was poorly written. It was all incoherent. Everything was the same, just repeating the same thing. I listened to it, but I didn't understand a word he said. I listened again, skipping around, and then I understood. He started by talking about dealing with the Dragon-Han Catastrophe, then kept mentioning it and preparing.

The text is riddled with typos and grammatically incorrect. It's a modern novel written in plain language, and while the use of "" in classical Chinese is correct, the use of "" and "" depends on how and whether they are used correctly. After reading over a hundred chapters, I still couldn't understand most of it; it was exhausting.

Laozi Taiqing, Yuanshi Yuqing, Tongtian Shangqing, Fang Lei Shaqing