The Carefree Son-in-Law

Too holy, so indecisive

The author has a good starting point. He has been inculcating feminist ideas and pursuing equality between men and women. This is correct now, but it was impossible to achieve in ancient times. Ideas are also one of the manifestations of the stage of social operation. Under the social productivity, everyone is worried about survival, and the people at the bottom are "farming and mulberry farming". I dare to ask, can "farming and mulberry farming" really make women hold up half of the sky? The physiological structure of men and women determines that women's upper and lower limits of physical strength will not be stronger than men's. There may be very outstanding individuals, but overall they are definitely inferior. "Women can hold up half the sky" could not be established in ancient times. This has no mass basis. Even if women hope in their hearts, it is just hope. This It also explains why the people at the bottom of the society, regardless of gender, agree with "male supremacy", because whoever contributes more has a greater say. "Male supremacy" is a reflection of the fact that ancient men had a higher say than women. In the final analysis, ancient men created more productivity than women, but is this enough to explain the ancient social operating system? Undoubtedly not possible, what did the Queen say? What do the ladies of official families say? They can also bully ordinary men and women. The source of their power comes from men, but only men with social status can provide these powers. This is called "patriarchy", and the root of "patriarchy" is not "father" but "power". In ancient times, men were the dominant Respect is only one part. The most fundamental thing is respect for power. The manifestation of respect for power is the hierarchical social status: scholars, farmers, industry and merchants, basically the landlord class (emperors, scholar-officials and businessmen, businessmen can win over scholar-officials with money) > peasant class > = working class. The economic base determines the superstructure. If you describe the beauty of high-rise buildings in modern times, others can understand it. In ancient times, others would only think that you are a lunatic with a good imagination. Many times, it is very problematic to take things for granted and seem unreasonable, leading to a bad perception. If the brain does not think deeply and deliberate, it is counter-intuitive that it is unreasonable at first glance, and it feels awkward to look at it.

It doesn't work anymore. After seeing more than 700 characters, I feel like the protagonist has lost his brain. He can leave as others arrange. If he is a person, he can be punished

The whole movie is about this girl and that girl. It's so awesome. I suggest changing the title of the book. There's nothing else to say.

It's such a virgin bitch, the emperor tried his best to kill the protagonist, and the protagonist tried his best to lick her. Potatoes, sweet potatoes, and rubber are all produced in the Western Regions. Various inventions were made immediately without any mention of process technology or raw materials.

In ancient times, if you rebelled against male superiority and female inferiority, you would risk your life, so just don't open a harem! The left and right brains interact with each other

The background of the story and the plot characters are a bit confusing, and the portraits of the characters are not very good.

I can't read the rest of it, it's so terrible, I'm just trying to make up the word count

I have read a novel where the main character is the most holy. I can't bear it. His character is extremely despicable and he doesn't realize it. Don't let any opponent die, let them all go, and then write slowly. A smart character just doesn't want to kill the opponent, hahaha

It is undeniable that the author's writing style and the direction of the plot are indeed good, especially the planning and planning. Although some places are a bit far-fetched, overall it is really good. But what is unsatisfactory is that the killing is not decisive, it is too holy. It doesn't matter that the emperor is the father-in-law and doesn't want to rebel, but Prince Ning and the prince of the previous dynasty who rebelled several times will not be killed because they rebelled and killed so many people. The lives of the people are the victims of your power rebellion. Then don't care about the people so much all day long. If the protagonist really cares about the people, he would have killed these two people long ago instead of letting them go again and again.