Harry Potter: The Fake Gryffindor Hero

Ginny was really a big failure. She let monsters severely damage Hogwarts, which is basically equivalent to killing the professor who came to save people (even if he was Snape). She clearly said that any behavior must be agreed by both parties, but she always waited until something happened before she came out to condemn her, as if it had nothing to do with her. She looked innocent and upright, and she was not punished in any way like the original book. I haven't seen such a disgusting character in a long time.

I don't like Snape, but Ginny in this chapter is even more disgusting, and she feels like she's going crazy again.

Super fun! Super rich imagination! Like it very much!

In the early stage, it actually sounds no different from the original work, but it starts to get ok later on. . . Not bad!

. . . . . . If everything is similar to the original work, there is no need to read it.

Trash is trash, even women's clothing is trash. I don't even need to give you memory magic.

I read it twice and tried to take it in, but I still failed. The setting of deliberately growing long hair and reaching waist length is really too poisonous. Although I have only been reading online articles for a year, I thought I was immune to all poisons. In the end, I overestimated myself.

The concept (including Harry's appearance and character and the God of Cthulhu) is quite good, but it seems that because Harry has become stronger, the people around him (mainly the professor and Lao Fu) have also become stronger, and it is not as "enjoyable" as the previous book (Daphne's book). And if it is not regarded as an enjoyable article, but as a normal HP fan, the plot is not outstanding (compared to the books with milk tea and pudding). I wrote 3 million words, and the result is not much different from the original work. Looking at this book and Daphne's book, the biggest advantage of the author (Landless Night) is the fourth-year competition. The writing is extremely excellent, whether it is increasing the number of participating schools or specific competition events, it is very brilliant. But overall I think it is really average. I would rate Daphne's book as "good", but this one is not good. Personally, I think the biggest problem is that "Harry is strengthened, but the people around him also become stronger as a whole."

Well, it's very safe! It is safe enough to stay in the campus hospital n times a year.

It's hard to comment, except for the different beginning, the rest of the plot is exactly the same as the movie. The same recklessness, the same stupidity, the same brainless chess pieces at the mercy of others, and their survival depends entirely on the halo of the protagonist. And later on, the protagonist no longer looks feminine and returns to a male appearance. So, what is the difference between reading this book and watching the movie? I thought it was to give the protagonist a mental and physical education, so that he could become rational, smart, academic, smart, beautiful, and reach the pinnacle of life. In fact, the protagonist's personality and so on are no different from the original version. The plot has not changed at all