Master and Servant Reverse Roles: The Fallen Heiress Doesn't Want to Be Kept

The female lead should have just stabbed him in the heart. The family's collapse was due to a traitor; if she hadn't, she'd have let them go, otherwise they'd all die. That's when the hatred would build. "A debt of gratitude breeds resentment," she said, treating the protagonist like a slave. It would be truly satisfying to stab this ungrateful wretch in the back.

Fraudulent books, books that die as soon as they're listed.

I don't really understand why the female lead is torturing the protagonist like this. It seems like the protagonist treated her like family before. I can understand the situations with Phryne and Cheshire, but this feels like the torment is just for the sake of tormenting the protagonist.

No, is it another classic tale of someone with a hidden agenda, unwilling to reveal the truth, only to face a heartbreaking situation later? I feel like I've seen enough of this. Let's play "Lover Missed".

All I can say is that you should read this book purely as a story about a royal uncle; don't try to think too much about it.

Isn't the protagonist innocent? Even with all this, what else does the female lead need to do?

For someone like Aria, it would be masochistic for the female lead not to run away after completing her training.

This is the young imperial uncle.

Generally, you need to give up on the story to find it acceptable, but unfortunately I can't quite let go of it. The writing style is good, but the logic feels a bit lacking.

The interactions were well-written, but the plot was a bit ridiculous, to be honest. The reasons for revenge on both sides were weak, and the assassination attempt at the banquet was something I never expected. When I saw it, I thought I was still half asleep...