Sorry I Can Only Plagiarize

One star because of the tag. SK had an author who initially attracted this type of audience with yuri (lesbian) themes, made enough money, then reversed the ending, having the yuri harem members marry off. Of course, this author did a better job than that scumbag in this respect, at least being a double agent. But since the rise of the "transformation" genre, the debate between "transformation into yuri" and "transformation into marriage" has been fierce. Treating novels as a money-making tool isn't the way to do it. Trying to please both sides is impossible. QD has a book called "Yu Bao," which also has male and female characters in a harem, but it's more popular than this book. Trying to wade into both muddy waters requires writing skill.

Applying both labels is absolutely unacceptable. If you're writing fiction to support yourself and make money, you need to please your readers, especially the majority. Fiction is often divided into two factions or a "winner-takes-all" approach. Leaving a controversial topic and getting criticized is your own fault. If you want to make money from the "winner-takes-all" faction, just label it "winner-takes-all." The other factions won't bother coming to say anything. If you don't want to make money, just label it "I'm not making money anyway, so don't read it and get lost." Trust me, most readers who disagree will simply disappear without saying another word. You need to understand that you're selling a product, and your readers are the buyers...

This explanation is solely to curb this "two-way plug" trend. It's understandable that authors need to make a living, but they shouldn't resort to underhanded methods. Readers are consumers and have the right to know. To protect consumer rights, I can only give authors low scores. Everyone is helpless, so we hurt each other and understand each other. Finally, I've reached 140 characters. Sorry, many times we have no other choice, and I'm ultimately just an emotionless scoring machine.

I finally understand why I never want to see the synopsis of this book. This synopsis is just pointless whining, no different from "What is Meng Lei"—purely a product of piling up fancy words. What is Meng Lei? Young man, Luna, Feng Mingcheng. Could you elaborate? Han Xin, stealing the tower, is praised by all. Could you be more specific? Li Bai, though with a drop of blood, could still be brilliant. Still don't understand? Once arrogant, now invincible.

I clicked in and read a few chapters; the author's writing is very good. However, I'm unsure if it's a yuri/married-off story or a single-person story. While I can read both yuri/married-off stories, I hope to read it with initial anticipation, rather than being left feeling uncomfortable by the author's ambiguity. With the author's approach, I wouldn't even give it one star if I could.

This has dragged on for far too long. I've been reading this book for over three years, and I've been waiting for it to finish for more than two years. At first, they said it would be finished at two million words, and then last year you said it was almost over and about to get into the main plot, but it's still just filler. I can't wait any longer. Also, the debate about whether it's a yuri story or about marriage isn't really about the plot itself, but about how poorly it's written. Using the same trope once or twice is fine, but three, four, five, six times! Using the same trope more than ten times is disgusting. It feels like the same play with different actors. Furthermore, the book lacks a clear main plot. Often it simply records what the young lady did...

I just ask that this trope stop repeating itself. It was less of a "pretending to be weak to deceive others" situation before, but now it happens 4 or 5 times in 20 chapters, and I'm really tired of it. Speaking of characters, several characters don't seem to have a clear purpose for being there. For example, Lu Xinghe and his senior. At first, when Lu Xinghe accused the young lady of plagiarism, I was hoping for a scenario where the original author existed but hadn't published their work. The young lady's panic was only mentioned a few chapters ago, and then completely ignored later. After reading to the end, I couldn't understand the point of that scene at all. Although there are many similar plot points throughout the novel, I think this one should...

Are you really planning to eat this for the rest of your life?

Please, please stop writing novels within novels! I'm really looking forward to the ending. I'm only paying for your content, and you're just padding the word count every day. I'm a little disappointed. I saved up for a year to finally read this, and you've written so much! This comment section requires me to write 160 characters, so I'll just add some filler too. Filler, filler, filler!

"Transforming into a lesbian" (or "yuri") is a male-centric concept, while "transforming into a wife" (or "transforming into a man") is a female-centric concept. However, in novels, the differences between the two are significant, with different focuses, distinctions between the seducer and the pursued, and variations in style, plot, and tropes. To put it extremely, it's like the difference between the tropes of Qidian (a popular Chinese online literature platform) and Jinjiang (another popular Chinese online literature platform). "Transforming into a lesbian" is an anomaly within yuri (lesbian) fiction; even those who genuinely enjoy yuri might not be able to tolerate it. In fact, most "transforming into a lesbian" stories are closer to male-oriented fiction. "Transforming into a wife" should be categorized as female-oriented fiction, where the writing style is better suited to enhancing the plot. The target audiences for these two genres shouldn't be confused. If it's purely story-driven and plot-oriented, it's probably a single-person story; if it involves romance...