As a Woman in a Matriarchal World, I Slay Scumbag Men, Only to Catch the Heroine's Eye

To be honest, the protagonist seems to be a scumbag in the guise of an anti-scumbag.

By chapter seven, it didn't feel like a matriarchal society at all; it felt like a normal world. The female lead even dragged the male lead into bed and warned him to keep his distance or he'd be in big trouble.

In the end, the dragon slayer becomes the dragon. No one wants to share their lover with someone else; nobody does. However, some immature overgrown children treat "precious and beautiful" members of the opposite sex as toys (and like them), and naturally, there's never too many beautiful toys. But brutal pleasure will inevitably end in brutality.

Kill the scumbag and save the beauty (X) Replace the scumbag and win the female lead (✓)

I think this is pretty good. Can a matriarchal world really have so many so-called "scumbag" male protagonists? In those worlds, men are used and discarded, and women die all the time. How could there be so many scumbags? Think about it: if a bunch of people fawn over you, and one of them is particularly kind, are you going to fawn over him instead? It's unlikely. In a matriarchal setting, women have an easier time cultivating than men, and they are more likely to succeed. The world's will is more inclined towards women—isn't that the setting of a matriarchal world? Also, I support the author. For now, sticking to the original outline is fine. (I guess the author's main focus is on the contrast between the protagonist and the scumbags. I don't know the exact outline; this is just my speculation.) Note: (The rest of the text is incomplete and likely refers to further details about the author's approach.)

Before it went on sale, I only had three words to say: "Boring." I'll subscribe, but if the plot doesn't develop further, I'll stay anonymous.

After reading the free portion, I feel the female-dominated setting is completely unnecessary. This book doesn't address the conceptual gap caused by the power dynamics within a female-dominated world. If you're not into this genre, don't force it. It might have been more successful without the "female-dominated" label.

Seeing the author's numerous annotations, it seems they have quite ambitious goals; at least the background setting and outline of this book show considerable effort. However, the writing style... Is really too immature, the process is somewhat bland, and it feels rather inexplicable to read. Whether it's readable or not depends on the individual; I'm neither recommending nor warning against it.

I'd like to ask about the plot logic; I'm planning to start watching.

Chapter 32 is truly baffling. The earlier chapters depicted the master's deep affection for the male lead, but in chapter 32, certain scenes cause the master to doubt the male lead, or rather, hesitate in front of the original protagonist and the male lead. This makes it seem as if the master's feelings for the male lead weren't portrayed as deep. Logically, given such profound feelings, the master should have been enraged, or at least fearful of losing their disciple, not concerned with the scene, much less doubtful. Why then would they hesitate? The master's emotions here are poorly written. Wouldn't it be better if it were changed to the master feeling panic and fear because of these scenes and the possibility of losing the male lead? That would be more consistent...