We're All Brothers. What's Wrong with Me Becoming Your Brother-in-Law?

Very nice~

The most obvious ones are typos, and then there is a sense of fragmentation in the development of the plot, not the kind of story development, but the kind of character development, especially the cannon fodder character. You say he is good, but based on the narration and dialogue, you know that he is not much better. You say he is bad. His badness ends in an anticlimax. There seems to be some moral bottom line... What makes the characters so sophisticated? I have read a lot of this type of themes, and I think "My Sister is a Big Star" has the most profound memory. The characters in it are good and pure, and bad are thorough. Each character has distinct characteristics. One of the key problems is that the heroine will find a partner because of a mustard disease. This reason is too far-fetched and even ridiculous. One final word: I can't drive well and I don't know which pheasant driving school I took the driving test from. I hope the author can read "The End of the World" by Feng Chaohuang.

In the early stage, I felt it was okay, but in the later stage, the writing was messy. I thought it was a campus article, but it turned out to be an entertainment article, and it was a mess.

I don't know what's written in the back. It's inexplicable. The emotional line is also written in a mess. It's okay at first, but when my brain registers it, the rest is pure**

The content is not very exciting, and there are a lot of typos. It is difficult to distinguish between "he" and "she", which greatly affects reading.