The Husband Who Only Gave Me Money and Never Came Home Suddenly Came Back

I really like this book. The character of the heroine Tang Yi is simply not too cool~ The author occasionally makes jokes. You, the author, also use 5G to access the Internet! Haha, the dialogue between the heroine and the hero later on is totally wrong~ The more I watch it, the more I like it! Big cheers for the author! I hope you can update more articles😘😆I'm a big fan of Yanhuan and Tang Yi! I highly recommend this book~ After reading this book, you will be able to smile uncontrollably🥰This kind of author deserves to have me add chicken legs to you💕

Super healthy! Just one word, cool!

It's very real. I like Tang Yi very much. He has a small mouth. I feel that the male and female protagonists are very easy to talk to. 😍😍😍 I hope the author can update it soon, please😣😣(´°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥｀)

It's quite interesting. The book actually tells two major events. One is that the heroine defeats her fake parents, and the other is that the male and female protagonists join forces to defeat the heroine of Tiandao's original novel. The setting is quite interesting. The heroine wears a book, and the hero is originally the second male lead who is a dog-licker in the book. Although he is unwilling, he will be involuntarily controlled by the halo of the novel of the original heroine. In the end, the two work together to rebel against Tiangang. Hahahahahaha. I think it scores 80 points. You can read it in the book wasteland.

I thought it looked good as soon as I started watching it. Watching too much later is too high-spirited. The female protagonist is really smart, and the male protagonist is also out of control of the plot. There is no one who is unclear about that Pei Shuyao. The plot where the heroine messes with the monsters and monsters in his family is particularly enjoyable. Some are funny and some are reasonable. They were linked together to destroy the plot to harm her without leaving a trace. Let those bad guys be so angry that they can't kill her. So enjoyable.

I feel like I could write more emotional scenes for the male and female protagonists, and sprinkle some candy occasionally.

The plot is okay. It was the heroine who gave me the feeling that her outlook was incorrect, so I read Chapter 47. Why is it that the feud between the heroine and the second male lead (just think of him as the second male lead, I forgot his name) has been settled, and the second male lead has also apologized to her. As a result, when the heroine's brother came to find the male lead and beat him, she did not take action. I was particularly speechless. She also said it was a slap in her face. Even if there may be the second male lead and the female lead behind, her brother is discussing some conspiracy. But shouldn't the heroine pull them apart at that point? Or knock on the door to let them out. In short, it is impossible to sit there with headphones on and do nothing. It gives me a feeling of incorrect outlook. I really can't stand it anymore, it's like a knot in my heart. I don't understand why she doesn't care? She didn't have a God's perspective and didn't know that these two people were trying to harm her. So why doesn't she care? The second male lead had obviously already apologized to her, whether he meant it or not. I really don't understand.

Please give the author a big update! 🌹🌹

The heroine has a great personality (the world is big and life is the biggest). The characterization is very full. The plot has ups and downs. The writing is also very good and the description is very vivid. The heroine's optimistic character also surprised me. The plot can also be said to be very exciting. Some details are well mastered. The relationship between the male and female protagonists is also enviable. It is very interesting. I hope the teacher will be better in the future^^

The writing style is a bit average, and the character creation is a bit confusing. After reading the first twenty chapters, I felt that it was not polite to set the heroine up for being foul-mouthed. . . Is this a misunderstanding of what is lively and fresh?