Good Husband Tomorrow

It's an old book, I've read it before. Overall the concept is pretty good, but there are a lot of errors in details. This is also what makes the author feel strange. It is clear that some unpopular authors know about it, but he writes blindly about some common sense. For example, for some titles, how many dukes were there in the Ming Dynasty? The author seems to have written all over the streets, who is Zheng Guogong? Isn't it funny that a count claims to be humble to a third-grade civil servant? The same position of Jin Yiwei was transferred internally, and the emperor asked the cabinet? Then who asked about the three dead Qianhu people before? Beitongzhou is a state, not a prefecture. Lianzhou Prefecture is the territory of Guangdong. King Jingjiang is analogous to a prince, but actually he is a county king. With the name Zhu Shan, do you dare to say that he is from the Jingjiang branch? As for the story about Jin Yiwei's experience in the beginning, which lasts for dozens of chapters, it makes no sense, and anti-piracy is not written like this. There are many idiom errors in the article that I really don't understand. Furthermore, I have read most of the author's works, and he is still very good at writing romances, seducing sisters-in-law, etc., But when it comes to this article, it feels a bit disgusting. Machiavellian novels should have less of this method of referring to brother-in-law as "brother-in-law" for no reason, which lowers the tone for no reason.

This is the first time I heard about hemorrhoids growing on my butt! What's that thing on the anus?

Why do I write about apprenticeship? I hate reading time travel novels about apprenticeship.

The plot is good, but too boring

Farewell

There are a lot of typos, and some of the plots are childish, but the overall outline is okay, and the protagonist's personality is decisive enough to not be a virgin. Compared with those books that can steam wine, refine sugar, make salt, build cannons, and can make anything with modern technology, it is more realistic. Worth 9.2 Points without moisture. Give two votes, hope to produce better works

A dog-licking article full of typos

The plot of Tiger's book is pretty good, but among the few I've read, this is the worst one. I don't know if it is intentional, but I always write the idioms backwards, such as "the wind is light and the clouds are light", "the disaster is in the fish pond", "the pain is deep", and I forget it once or half time, but I still like to use it. There is also a really poor use of words, always "smiling", which is used no less than two hundred times. The most annoying thing is when writing about the Ming Dynasty, all "Wa La" is written as "Wa Ci". I don't know if it is a clerical error or an error in uploading. It is really eye-catching.

You write novels like this, and you still expect others to give you good reviews. A prince's articles are published bit by bit. Do you think ancient times would allow you to do this?

Sorry, I've been reading this for so long. After finishing it, I realized that this book is unfinished. Also, this book is mainly about plotting and war, and there's not much else to say. My wife happens to not be 3 missing 1.