Global Awakening: You Told Me to Drop Out, So I Raised the Ten Primordial Calamities

How✍🏻"Every sentence does not mention death, every sentence is death" Contemporary netizens pick me up first "The train leads to Huangquan Station, and the platform is full of deceased people coming to greet people. This is not a tragedy, this is a reunion."

After reading a few chapters, I don't want to read anymore. One of the ten ancient evils. His bloodline can't suppress an ordinary silver-level wolf. How many attributes can a level 10 wolf have? I really can't stand it.

Moreover, the title of each chapter does not match the article, and it becomes more and more confusing as you go to the end, and the Blackberry is like a psycho, and the Wood Crystal refuses to say thank you without saying anything. I canceled it after reading more than 300 chapters. I really don't recommend reading it. The good reviews are probably all negative.

The data is confusing, and the plot is inconsistent. I really don't know how those good reviews are generated. Can the writing be more rigorous? Shameful

The Virgin's Wisdom to the Eunuch, standard for Seven Cats

It was okay to read. This book fits my system and the content is pretty awesome.

Chapter 20 is less than the super poisonous point. A group of people in the wild rely on deceiving newcomers to kill others to obtain equipment. The male protagonist actually just punished them and let them go. If the male protagonist is not a time-traveler, but is just a simple student, I can say that he feels that there is still hope in this world. He has not seen the darkness of society, but he is a time-traveler, which is too intellectual. Or you can control them in the dark and let them rob others to support themselves. After all, strength is the most important thing in the apocalyptic world. But he chose to let them go after grabbing all the equipment. This would lead to sudden death, and they would work harder to trick newcomers into earning equipment. If a man kills a woman and rapes her, how many people will lose their lives because of the hero's behavior today of letting the evildoers go? Even if it's not for others, they came with the intention of killing the male protagonist, so why not kill them? No matter how exciting the sequel is, I really won't enjoy watching this kind of protagonist. In a world where people can die at any time, if someone approaches you with malicious intentions and if you don't deal with them as soon as possible, you will eventually suffer a big loss because of them in the future. Not him but also his kind.

Let me start with the conclusion: it doesn't look good and has no logic. I really shouldn't have typed the good-looking one, it was fine when you first started watching it. It's okay to read it as a cool novel, but when I saw the military academy, it said that there was a competition to choose people, and the protagonist was like a killer, insisting on choosing his own companions, I really wanted to give the author a slap in the face. I am a senior in college. Compared to you, the teammate of the protagonist of Killer Pen, who is so much higher in level and has so much more combat experience, but in the end, he cannot beat a newcomer without any cheats. How can you say you have perseverance? Is the strength and experience of the co-authored senior sister all just for show? Don't you have any weapons or equipment? Even if you say that the protagonist's brother won, I can accept it. After all, there is a magic sword. If you say that his female classmate won, you will be really angry. Let's use an analogy like this. The senior's experience and strength are equivalent to that of an adult. She used to be a prostitute, fight all day long, and has muscles. The protagonist's female companion's strength is equivalent to that of a junior high school student who has never fought. She has some muscles, but not much. When these two fight, who do you think will win? In the end, the female companion was surprised to win. With such a gap, you said it was because of perseverance, and I was curious. Does perseverance work? One punch will shock your brain, two punches will crack your bones, and three punches will leave you with nothing. Is your perseverance useful? You don't even have a weapon, are you going to fight with someone? Let's use another analogy. The male protagonist is like in a boxing match. He is the main force and his muscles are invincible. His brother can legally bring his fingers into the ring without gloves. His female classmate is like a complete newcomer, without any strength, while the senior sister is like a veteran boxer who has experienced many battles. As a result, you choose newcomers instead of veteran boxers. And then the newcomer defeated the veteran boxer with his so-called perseverance? According to what your author said, if I have perseverance and I get on stage, can I beat Tyson? Isn't this mentally retarded? Forced surrender. Zhi is really disgusting.

There are endless competitions, and no athlete is as diligent as you!

Very awesome