The Chancellor Disowned Me, So I Married the Regent and Became the Pride of the Capital

No, I believe many people have pointed out the typos in this article to the author! I've looked for so many, why hasn't it been corrected? Some sentences are also grammatically incorrect, please check it! I hope the author sees this and will make corrections.

It's a very good book, it would be even better if the plot were a bit faster!

Too many typos, the plot is too drawn out.

The female lead is independent and strong, while the male lead is warm and powerful, showering her with affection, which is very touching.

The female lead is portrayed as incredibly infatuated, like she hasn't seen a man in centuries. It's a bit off-putting, and the plot is strikingly similar to several other novels. Is this just copying someone else's work? It's pointless.

Many plot points are illogical. The female lead is, after all, the eldest daughter of the Prime Minister's family. It's understandable that she'd been brought back from the countryside two years ago and was living in the most remote and dilapidated courtyard, but it's illogical that she wasn't provided with maids, let alone bedding for two years.

It was okay at first, but it got more and more verbose later on. The dialogue between the male and female leads due to misunderstandings took a long time to write, and even when the female lead almost had her carotid artery cut, she was still rambling on and on. The word choice is also very repetitive, with phrases like "however," "on the contrary," "of course," and "although... But... Because..." This greatly affects the listening experience, and that's not all. Abandoned

It's verbose overall and has too many typos.

It's so good! The author is amazing. I hope you update soon!

The writing is immature, the plot is overly abrupt and awkward, the characters are shallow and unintelligent, and the overall story structure is loose; it's not enjoyable.