
Reborn Lawyer: You Might as Well Be Bolder in Your Appeal
重生律师:你的诉求不妨大胆一点
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 249k Words
- Genre
- Urban
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Urban Life
- Updated
- 3d ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
216Monthly votes
2.8kRecommends
2.6kFans
98Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
In booklists 1
Readers also read
China Entertainment: This Top-Notch Character Is Too Stable
Department of Abnormal Pathology
Rebirth in 87, Starting from Selling Sesame Seed Cakes and Vegetables
Evil Gourmet: This Person Has a Very High Food Quotient!
Ace Lawyer
You Are a Lawyer and You Apply for the Death Penalty for Your Client?
Rebirth 08: Expose Nobel Prize Scam and Become a Medical Giant
Great Han Chess Saint
You Have Been Reborn and You Want to Farm?
Lawyer: Inheriting a 100 Million Yuan Real Estate at the Beginning
The Crew Was in Trouble at the Beginning, and the Investors Asked Me to Be the Director
After Crying All over the Internet, I Reached the Top of the Entertainment Industry





Seeing this makes me angry
I have a lawyer's true feelings. There really are all kinds of stupid clients. A lawyer is someone who has a very good relationship with you. He has told you everything and taught you step by step, and yet he still wants to show off on his own.
The writing is okay, and the plots are interlocking. The author should have simplified some complicated things to make it easier for readers to understand and make the plot more enjoyable, which improves the reading experience of readers, because it is impossible for anyone to like to write some legal provisions and copy the Civil Code in one chapter.
If an accident occurs, all written records, right or wrong, should not be touched again.
Let me talk about my impressions, 1. The writing is smooth, the protagonist takes a different approach, the thinking is clear, and he always comes up with new ideas. He is a procedurally correct person. The book is very good. 2. There are also shortcomings, let's just say "Printer: The Day I Jammed in the Law Firm". This title would be more appropriate. The author relies too much on printer jams to advance the plot. This has been done for dozens of chapters, so forget it once or twice. Printer jams are still used to advance the plot. 3. In the case of the hospital's fake seal, the protagonist kept saying to He's father that he had to admit when he was wrong, incarnate as a great man, but he did not mention a word about the hospital's fault of dereliction of duty, framed up and shirk of responsibility, resulting in He's father's heavy sentence, saying that it was meaningless to mention it. Why is it meaningless? At least you mentioned it. Does the hospital still have the nerve to charge thousands of dollars in so-called miscellaneous fees? If you mention it, the court will also feel that the hospital itself has made serious mistakes, and the balance will naturally tilt towards Father He, without you having to take an eccentric approach in sentencing. But the protagonist just didn't mention it. If he didn't admit the mistakes of the hospital, he would have to admit it. The hospital made mistakes at zero cost. Not only did He's father get sent in, but he also earned thousands of dollars in miscellaneous expenses. Typical double standard dog. 4. The latest Haichuan and Huicheng case is essentially the same as the hospital fake seal case. Haichuan was at fault, but Huicheng also derelict in his duties, planted and mixed up the materials to put all the blame on Haichuan, deliberately sent Haichuan in, deducted tens of millions of losses to Haichuan, and used Haichuan to settle the account. It all depends on how the author writes about such a big crime as Huicheng. Does he not even mention Huicheng's crime because it's pointless to mention it? Then, as a defender, he considers it a victory when he goes from being prosecuted indefinitely to being sentenced to only a few years in prison for Haichuan? What is the difference between that and the fake hospital seal case? As a defender, the protagonist cannot just sentence the defender and consider it a victory. The mistakes committed by the other party must also be investigated. We cannot only be upright to the defender but condone the other party's mistakes at zero cost. It's unpleasant to see this. Like Ben next door, as a defense lawyer, he directly countersued, not only protecting the defender, but also countersuing to hold the other party responsible for the crime. That would relieve his anger. 5. For example, a child kindly helped an old man who fell. The old man said that the child knocked him down. As a defense lawyer, you cannot prove the child's innocence through evidence only, but do not countersue and pursue the old man for blackmail. Then the old man's blackmail is zero cost. If you do not pursue a countersuit, you are condoning the old man to continue committing crimes, which is an injustice to society.
Shennong's poison test post
The plot is logically reasonable and meticulous, and the characters are typical The protagonist's talking style is very High-quality food and grass
It's so well written, yet so few people have read it. The level is still higher than the book next door about inheriting a billion-yuan real estate at the beginning.
The fragment is still the same as always 🤔. Send me the address and I will send you some souvenirs.
It's okay. Why doesn't anyone comment?
Fuck, I love coconut chicken so much. If I don't eat coconut chicken, I'm just reading a book and poking fun at the coconut chicken's nest.
So deserted
Logically speaking, this kind of article should have quite a few book lovers, and it has published several books with thousands of subscriptions. It feels like it shouldn't be so deserted.