This Time Travel Is Too Real

The title of the book collides with "This Game Is Too Real", which may have some influence. It is recommended to change it.

It gives me the impression that Italian cement is mixed with No. 17 Hot dry noodles. It can be eaten while it is hot, but it will be a lump in the stomach.

These five axioms are too hard-core and seem to be easy for eunuchs to understand.

Man, the law of the earth, the law of heaven, the law of the road, the law of nature

Brother, if you want to write a paper, you can just go to a journal and write it. There is no need to embarrass others.

The setting and world view are extensive, but the plot cannot support it. It gives people the feeling of falling in love in a future world. Changing the background to ancient times has no impact on the storyline.

The biggest problem with this book is that the semantics are not clearly expressed. In a novel, or a science fiction novel, you can make the readers confused or feel superior in the science fiction part, but you can't do that in the storyline, otherwise the readers will look at you and gibber, to be honest. I am quite interested in this kind of subject matter, so I read it very seriously. It took me more than two hours to read less than twenty chapters, and then I found that there are a lot of things in the article that I don't know why this character said this, had this reaction, who said this, who is this person, etc. And so on, when I read The Three-Body Problem before, even though I didn't know whether his theory was correct or whether his logic was rigorous, at least I could clearly understand his main line and where his story had developed. Everyone's behavioral logic and brain circuits were very clear. This is the most basic of a novel. Elements, I'm not reading a Machiavellian novel, I want to be able to clearly understand everyone's intentions. Even if it's a Machiavellian novel, if you want to be the Riddler, you must have a narration from a God's perspective to clarify the context of the matter, instead of asking the reader to guess the process of character interaction And this is not something that a few readers commented below saying that they can understand it. It is easy to understand. Whether you are the Crimson King or not, cloud reading can make sense. I have read the book at Qidian for so many years. After I spent more than two hours carefully reading the content of only twenty chapters and still being confused in many places, it shows the seriousness of the problem. I don't want to worry about whether it's the layout that makes people overlook a lot of elements or whether it's just the author's unclear expression. I just know that you made me read it carefully for so long. My doubts have not only not diminished, but also increased. I didn't understand just one place and you can say I am the Crimson King. I didn't understand dozens of places. I really need to consider whether I can't keep up with the author's brain circuit.

It's so uncomfortable to read. After reading one or two paragraphs, I have to analyze who said the words and who thought them. I also have to read up and down the paragraphs to see what is written 😒😒😒 The semantic expression is too poor.

Apart from the Qidian official and the author, I am the 12th reader to post and follow the author. I am not related to each other. 2026/8/6 This book potential number 268

Looking at the comment section of your last book, didn't you go for medical treatment? Are you ready?

The angle of view is not good, but the settings are good.

Is there anyone like me? I feel like my IQ has been severely challenged and I can only skip reading 😭

Please give the author some basic settings. It's a bit confusing after reading two chapters.

It's so well written. Why doesn't anyone read it? I suggest you skip the previous settings.