Hogwarts: Why Call Me the Dark Lord

The title of this book is not a good introduction. It's quite interesting. If I hadn't been unable to find the book, I wouldn't have noticed it.

The protagonist seems to enjoy being part of Grindelwald and Dumbledore's play. . . . Looking like an old lover to get close to an old gay man? To be honest, this kind of thinking is rare even in Britain.

Professor McGonagall knew about the gift of prophecy. She just thought that Trelawney did not inherit that gift, so it was impossible to say that the gift of prophecy was unheard of. Dumbledore and Grindelwald have broken up a long time ago. Every time I see fans talking about this, I feel very disconnected. The mistake that Dumbledore could not let go of in his later years was that he was blinded by his own ambition and neglected his family and love. It was not that he failed to make peace with Grindelwald. He didn't fight Grindelwald because he was afraid of facing the truth of the past, and he didn't have so much unrequited passion. Dumbledore realized his mistake and suffered from inner torture for many years. This is Rowling's important portrayal of Dumbledore's love. Writing about the nature of Dumbledore and Grindelwald's relationship is a blasphemy against this love.

The overall quality of the book is okay, and the writing is a bit slow, that is, wordy, but now there are more and more AI stool lines, which are not bad, but I still decided not to read it, just for my own reasons, because the author has been interacting with Grindelwald and Dumbledore, and his identity is deeply involved with the two, and ended up being branched to Hercules. Patch, just because old Deng's favorite student is Newt Scamander, who belongs to Hufflepuff. The plot is too separated from the previous one, without any foreshadowing. It's not very comfortable to watch, with a sense of tearing and a sense of hard play. I can only leave the show with regret. I wish the author will improve his writing and write better Goodbye.

I just finished reading Chapter 199. What do you think, author? The Potter family is the descendant of the third Peverell family. It has always been a pure-blood family. It was only in Harry's generation that it became a mixed-race family. His family's non-existence in the Twenty-Eight House is purely a matter of political stance. How can you regard his family as a mixed-race family?

This article is hydrophilic, so dry food lovers should take note.

It was so painful to watch. There are very few effective and continuous lines and nutritious plot information, but it always insists on explaining and explaining. It seems that just a small character breathing, drinking water and wiping his butt have to be explained in a long paragraph.

At first, I focused on magic, and the writing was very good. Once it was released, I stopped talking about it, and became crazy about politics. Since it was released, I have written about Fudge and how much about politics. I am only in the first grade and I am writing like this. What happens next??? What I want to see is a magic school, not a political school. Just keep it and check it out later.

There are a large number of "crooked buildings", unnecessary descriptions, and inexplicable expansion. . . .

Why do you still think that Potter is from a mixed-race family? They are descendants of the third son of Peverell, and they have passed down the Deathly Hallows from generation to generation. They are all pure-bloods all the way up to James. Why do you have a mixed-blood family?