Usurping the Mongols: Starting as an Enslaved Han

I'm confused. The more Chinese it is, the more useless it becomes. Manchu Qing is an example.

The first part was okay, but I didn't want to follow it after I found someone who used dreaming as an excuse. I wanted to see the author really put his effort into conceiving the strategy, instead of this kind of stickman who always acts as a stickman, and is a very blunt stickman. In the final analysis, the author didn't put in the effort and was lazy.

Genghis Khan period: At that time, members of the Mongolian royal family (Golden Family) were usually called "Noyan" (meaning officials, lords), and there was no word "Taiji". Taiji is a derivative of the Chinese character Taizi in the Northern Yuan Dynasty. King of Jin → Jinong (deputy khan/right-wing commander) Prince → Taiji (noble/prince) Taishi → Taishi (non-golden family powerful minister, Ru Yexian) Prime Minister → Zaisang (official/minister)

Whether I'm a veteran from Inner Mongolia or I'm from Outer Mongolia, I seldom use this thing.

It's a masterpiece among niche articles. It's really well written. It's the kind of writing style I like. The research and understanding of historical facts are very good. Come on, author, don't stop updating.

The grasslands have not been unified yet. I want to see the author write about the Battle of Yehuling.

More updates, more updates, more updates!

You don't even know what the foundation of a foothold is, how can you abolish the Han slaves?

After entering the Kingdom of Jin, I started to get bored. What I wanted to see was the Great Expedition, where blood flowed like rivers of blood, not plots and plots.

It's not like this character has a big role, right?