Global Power Outage: Only My Car Doesn't Have a Chip

If you use less brackets like [], you will really lose any sense of immersion in the novel. It will appear that the author is overplaying the story. The novel is overall very good, but the [] thing really ruins the perception.

It looks pretty good from the front, with the little characters fighting for their families in the chaos, which gives a sense of immersion. Although the overall plot has flaws and complaints when I read Chapter 30 or 40, the overwhelming progression of the plot from one survival point to the next is indeed dizzying. But the AI ​​flavor in the later article is too strong. At first I thought the author was going to write a farming novel about ordinary people struggling to survive in a crisis world where all electronic equipment is damaged. Then the main plot was to gain a foothold in survival, discover the causes of the crisis, and the confrontation with the final villain, and the ending. It turned out that it was a road story with my daughter, and I thought it was okay. I felt that exploring the causes of the apocalyptic crisis must be one of the main threads of this article. This kind of background setting is relatively scarce in Qidian, so I can tolerate it. However, from the very beginning due to the conflict between fetching water and neighbors, too many opponents appeared like background boards and were defeated by the protagonist. Later, there were various professional mechanical repair contents and frequent changes in survival points. Although the overall rhythm was fast, the lack of digging into the causes of the crisis continued to consume the readers' greatest sense of expectation. And since the emergence of non-auto repair professional knowledge, the flavor of AI has become stronger and stronger, mainly because of the unique metaphors and descriptions, which make you look like a living person at first glance. I don't know how capable AI is at writing web articles now, and I haven't tried it myself. If this article were all written by AI, then it can be said that there is almost no place for novice writers. Of course, I know that this conclusion is yesterday's news, but I still have mixed feelings about it. If the background setting and main plot direction of this article are controlled by the author, I think it is generally good (limited to the thirty or forty chapters I have read), but the prompt words for the specific content need to be enriched, and for technical points, if you don't understand it, you still have to read it, and don't completely copy AI, because now readers generally use AI, and your use of large pages is too obvious. If the design of storyboards now requires the participation of authors, then I think the competition among authors will rise to a higher level, with higher requirements for the author's writing ability, taste, experience, aesthetics, comprehensive quality, and especially learning ability.