Ming Dynasty: in the Beginning, He Complained That Zhu Di Was Not the Right One to Succeed to the Throne.

Isn't it easy for the protagonist to want to be killed because of Jin Jian? Tiantian Shangshu asked Zhu Di to clarify the historical records and change the years of Hongwu 31-35 to the Jianwen period, and then asked Zhu Di to give Emperor Jianwen a posthumous temple name and offer sacrifices every year. If the protagonist survives for one day, Zhu Dicai is b.

According to this way of writing, you can no longer survive by admonishing, but the protagonist still insists on admonishing every day, is there something wrong with his head? Now he talks about leaving his name in history, and now he engages in so-called death remonstrances every day, which is annoying to watch.

Just looking at the title of this book, it seems rather abstract. If he is accused of improper succession, what should Zhu Di do? Sticking your head out for Zhu Yun to chop? Or is it better to call Zhu Yuanzhang back, depose Zhu Yunwen and pass the throne to him instead?

Zhu Di was right to move the capital to Beijing. At that time, the north and the south had been separated for so long. The capital was Nanjing, and the people of the north did not want it anymore. There was a huge educational and economic gap between the north and the south at that time. What Zhu Di wanted to do was to bridge the north and the south, not to enjoy happiness in Nanjing.

This person is arguing nonsense about Zhu Di's legitimacy as emperor. I came up with a few ridiculous theories. First, he said that the Qingjun side was legal, but in fact the Qingjun side was not legal. If the Qingjun side was legal, then the rebellion of the Seven Kings of the Western Han Dynasty was also legal. It was also legal for Cao Cao to kill the concubine, the prince, and the queen. They were all Qingjun sides. Second, this person claimed that Zhu Di was the legitimate son, but Zhu Yunzhen was not the legitimate son, so Zhu Di's rebellion was legal. The problem is that Zhu Yunwen, the leader of the Ming Dynasty system, is the legitimate son, and Zhu Yuanzhang recognizes him as the legitimate son. If this person doesn't recognize it, why doesn't he overthrow the Ming Dynasty? Then he has the final say, and Zhu Yuanzhang does not count. Third, this person is the most interesting. He said that if Zhu Di changed Zhu Yuanzhang's last edict, Zhu Di would be legal. Zhu Di himself didn't dare to say this, but he did! He dared to do what Zhu Di didn't dare to do! Zhu Di dared to delete the comments he dared to delete! It's really amazing.

? What's wrong with Zhu Di's succession to the throne?

I don't know why someone would move the crystal to the location of the first tower to wash the floor. Zhu Di moved the capital to guard against Zhu Di's second, and guarded against the border troops rather than the historical nomads in the north. On the contrary, the defense of Beijing was only possible when the crystal moved forward, the Gengxu Revolution, the Jisi Revolution, and Li Zicheng's defeat of Beijing (this was fought from Xi'an) In addition, water transport itself had to support hundreds of thousands of frontier troops. Nanjing was originally a grain-producing center and did not need any additional water transport. Making Beijing the capital added another million people to the already busy water transport. Taking the seventh year of Wanli as an example, the total tax and grain of North Zhili and Shandong provinces is about 3.75 Million shi, while Beijing + palace + hundreds of officials + Beijing camp: annual consumption of 4 to 6 million shi. Nine-border frontier troops (Xuan Da Ji Liao, etc.): Annual consumption of 8 to 10 million shi. In addition, the coastal areas of Hebei and western Shandong are prone to saline-alkali, waterlogging, and drought. Famines occur almost every two to three years, so there is no hope of them.

Zero points for logic, full points for writing, and full points for fun. I never thought that such serious words could make people laugh so hard that they couldn't close their mouths.

Here is a summary for the author. In feudal society, the emperor's class interests were linked to the interests of the people at the bottom. They are of the same class. Of course, some people will say that I am talking nonsense. Isn't the emperor an exploiting class? This is actually true or not. If you say he is right, it is because the emperor is the highest class in feudal society. He has privileges including collecting taxes, recruiting soldiers, customizing systems, allocating resources, dealing with officials, etc. These privileges can be implemented by the emperor with just one sentence, so the emperor has the attribute of exploiting the people at the bottom, and then Let's talk about the reason why he and the people are in the same class. The reason is taxation and the army. Taxation is the emperor's pocket. It can ensure the emperor's food, drink, and other expenses. Therefore, the emperor must ensure that the people have money and food so that he can maintain the operation of his court. Otherwise, where will the officials' salaries be paid? Therefore, the emperor is not only an exploiting class, but also a self-interested class that promotes the interests of the people. Let's talk about the army. The source of the army is just two words. If the "lower class" emperor wants to maintain the army to maintain external and internal deterrence, he must ensure the interests of the people at the bottom, that is, the upward path is unimpeded. However, the promotion and transfer of the upward path were delegated to civilian officials by the emperor. In order to maintain their own interests, officials have to exploit the lower class and hinder the advancement of the people at the bottom to divide their own interests. Therefore, in movies and TV dramas, we often see the emperor quarreling with ministers over a little money. Why is this so? To put it bluntly, the class is different. The civil servant class is an exploiting class. He can only make himself rich by exploiting the people at the bottom. Otherwise, how long will it take to get rich by relying on the emperor's rewards! The emperor is different. The world belongs to him. Isn't it the same as stealing the emperor's pocket when your civil servants exploit the people at the bottom? And if you copy too hard, the people might send the emperor to the west. Do you understand when you see this? You can be an emperor only if you have the support of the people at the bottom, rather than being the emperor first and then having the support of the people at the bottom.

God TM Yongle Emperor couldn't stand it in the first chapter. I couldn't even write it clearly when I wrote it. Where did Yongle come from half a year after he ascended the throne? Did you seal it?

You said Zhu Yuanzhang, I believe that Zhu Biao can tolerate people, but can Zhu Di tolerate pig feet spraying like this?

I don't want to read it even after reading the introduction.

If the capital had not been moved to Beijing, the early Ming Dynasty would have likely given up on the north in the face of Mongolian counterattacks because it was out of reach, and eventually degenerated into a wealthy but shrinking Southern Ming or post-Southern Song Dynasty. Moving the capital to Beijing actually forcibly nailed the defense line of Han civilization to the Great Wall, and could not stay in Nanjing, because the biggest threat came from In the northern Mongolian grassland, if the capital is Nanjing, it will take a long time for the battle reports from the front to be sent back, and it will be almost too late to mobilize troops northward Luoyang is unsafe to defend, and soil erosion in Xi'an will be very serious by the Ming Dynasty, and the cost of water transportation is too high Moving the capital to Beijing may have many problems, but I feel that there is really no other option

According to what you said, Zhu Yuanzhang also had an unfair position. He used the name of Xiao Ming Wang to conquer the world, so he killed Xiao Ming Wang and then became the emperor himself 🙂🙂

How could you be a loyal person for generations? In the early Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang had just founded the country. If your family had been loyal for generations, you would not have been born. Your grandfather or father would have died for the Yuan Dynasty.

Let the author of the book explain how the rumor that Yang Guang killed many people in the Sui Dynasty came about and the total population. The total population of the Sui Dynasty was 8.9 Million households during Yang Guangye's reign. Based on a household of 5 people, the total population was approximately 45 million (hidden households are not counted). Then Yang Guang built the Grand Canal. The construction of the Grand Canal started in the first year of Daye and ended in December. It took a total of one year to build. Well, here comes the problem. This is what your author calls this. This is a blind spot that has killed many people. According to historical records, Yang Guang recruited more than two million people per month to build the Grand Canal. How about it? Do you understand? It took more than two million people per month to build the Grand Canal. If more than two million people were recruited per month, it means that a total of 24 million people invested in the Grand Canal before and after. Tsk, tsk, how big a construction site can accommodate it? Did the Sui Dynasty have so many tools at that time? Are there millions of troops guarding it? No more border defense? No more taxes? No more food grown? It is really a foolish fantasy, and this is one of the few logical problems. The biggest logical problem is whether there were so many young people in the Sui Dynasty. The key is that the total population is about 45 million, half of them are women, and there are almost 20 million people left. After we separate out the elderly, there are still 10 million men, and we separate out the children. Hahaha, it is a great achievement for the Sui Dynasty to maintain the number of young people at 8 million, and then the sexy manipulation came again. Historical records are revised. 2.5 Million people died in the Grand Canal, hahahaha, 2.5 Million young people, not 250. The historians are doubtful about this historical data because there is no evidence to prove it. However, there are still people who believe it. I am really convinced. Finally, I will talk about how this rumor came about. This historical record is that Sima Guang, a fool, wrote the novel "The Story of the River" written by the late Tang Dynasty scholar Han Wo as historical data in order to blackmail Yang Guang. How about it, are you surprised or not?

Brother, your introduction seems abstract. If you dare to criticize the emperor like this, Taigong Jiang can't stand it. Moreover, you really think the ancients were fools for the things you criticize? Shuangwen should also be logically self-consistent. Even if you rely on your body to become a saint, it would be better than this setting.

Thinking too much, unless you use the wisdom technique. Otherwise, even if Zhu Yuanzhang got up, Zhu Di would chop him to death with a knife, and then shout that the demons were causing trouble. Unless Lao Zhu climbed up with an army of 100,000, it would be fake to see Zhu Di dreaming of his father like that in the Ming Dynasty. If you don't kill this situation, let's celebrate the New Year.

During the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, people were martyred and had their feet bound. It was simply anti-human. I don't understand why so many people like it.

Classic modern people's thoughts are substituted into ancient times. If you were to be Zhu Di, you might not be as good as others. Let alone the introduction, this rubbish title will not make people want to read 😁

This idea must have been written badly!

As the title says, give the author some face and read more about the subsequent plot. The author has some brains. Closing the vassal and moving the capital were not wrong moves, but the Ming Dynasty had a better choice.

During the flood, the protagonist is running around and making trouble. When he comes to the disaster area, shouldn't he pull people in and find solutions again and again? The victims can first be collected by the people brought here. The protagonist goes to see the flood situation, and then looks for a solution. After finding the solution, let the collected people solve it. First solve the flood, then resettle the victims, and finally clean up the people.

It's really not difficult for Zhu Di's subordinates to die.

From Zhu Chongba to Zhu Di, there were only two dynasties plus Jianwen, and then there were only three dynasties. Zhongliang from generation to generation is the Zhongliang of the Meng Yuan Dynasty, and the actual achievements of the Zhu family are to recreate the Meng Yuan Dynasty. You can also say that Zhongliang is in the past.

A monthly pass, remember to recharge

Zhu Di will kill the protagonist, and Li Shimin will probably listen to it, but he will hold the knife on his phone.

Will Zhu Di still kill him? If you were fine for other reasons, but Zhu Di changed history and directly allowed Zhu Yuanzhang to live a few more years after his death, would he still dare not kill the protagonist?

I originally liked reading historical novels, but since I learned that history was changed beyond recognition by the Manchus and Qing Dynasties, I can no longer read them.

Do you really think that you are a piece of cake and that you will not die no matter what you do? There is no need to read this novel, it is a mindless novel.