Great Ming: From the Start, I Condemn Zhu Di's Illegitimate Succession

Isn't it easy for the protagonist to want to be killed because of Jin Jian? Tiantian Shangshu asked Zhu Di to clarify the historical records and change the years of Hongwu 31-35 to the Jianwen period, and then asked Zhu Di to give Emperor Jianwen a posthumous temple name and offer sacrifices every year. If the protagonist survives for one day, Zhu Dicai is b.

According to this way of writing, you can no longer survive by admonishing, but the protagonist still insists on admonishing every day, is there something wrong with his head? Now he talks about leaving his name in history, and now he engages in so-called death remonstrances every day, which is annoying to watch.

Just looking at the title of this book, it seems rather abstract. If he is accused of improper succession, what should Zhu Di do? Sticking your head out for Zhu Yun to chop? Or is it better to call Zhu Yuanzhang back, depose Zhu Yunwen and pass the throne to him instead?

Zhu Di was right to move the capital to Beijing. At that time, the north and the south had been separated for so long. The capital was Nanjing, and the people of the north did not want it anymore. There was a huge educational and economic gap between the north and the south at that time. What Zhu Di wanted to do was to bridge the north and the south, not to enjoy happiness in Nanjing.

This person is arguing nonsense about Zhu Di's legitimacy as emperor. I came up with a few ridiculous theories. First, he said that the Qingjun side was legal, but in fact the Qingjun side was not legal. If the Qingjun side was legal, then the rebellion of the Seven Kings of the Western Han Dynasty was also legal. It was also legal for Cao Cao to kill the concubine, the prince, and the queen. They were all Qingjun sides. Second, this person claimed that Zhu Di was the legitimate son, but Zhu Yunzhen was not the legitimate son, so Zhu Di's rebellion was legal. The problem is that Zhu Yunwen, the leader of the Ming Dynasty system, is the legitimate son, and Zhu Yuanzhang recognizes him as the legitimate son. If this person doesn't recognize it, why doesn't he overthrow the Ming Dynasty? Then he has the final say, and Zhu Yuanzhang does not count. Third, this person is the most interesting. He said that if Zhu Di changed Zhu Yuanzhang's last edict, Zhu Di would be legal. Zhu Di himself didn't dare to say this, but he did! He dared to do what Zhu Di didn't dare to do! Zhu Di dared to delete the comments he dared to delete! It's really amazing.

? What's wrong with Zhu Di's succession to the throne?

Zero points for logic, full points for writing, and full points for fun. I never thought that such serious words could make people laugh so hard that they couldn't close their mouths.

I don't know why someone would move the crystal to the location of the first tower to wash the floor. Zhu Di moved the capital to guard against Zhu Di's second, and guarded against the border troops rather than the historical nomads in the north. On the contrary, the defense of Beijing was only possible when the crystal moved forward, the Gengxu Revolution, the Jisi Revolution, and Li Zicheng's defeat of Beijing (this was fought from Xi'an) In addition, water transport itself had to support hundreds of thousands of frontier troops. Nanjing was originally a grain-producing center and did not need any additional water transport. Making Beijing the capital added another million people to the already busy water transport. Taking the seventh year of Wanli as an example, the total tax and grain of North Zhili and Shandong provinces is about 3.75 Million shi, while Beijing + palace + hundreds of officials + Beijing camp: annual consumption of 4 to 6 million shi. Nine-border frontier troops (Xuan Da Ji Liao, etc.): Annual consumption of 8 to 10 million shi. In addition, the coastal areas of Hebei and western Shandong are prone to saline-alkali, waterlogging, and drought. Famines occur almost every two to three years, so there is no hope of them.

Here is a summary for the author. In feudal society, the emperor's class interests were linked to the interests of the people at the bottom. They are of the same class. Of course, some people will say that I am talking nonsense. Isn't the emperor an exploiting class? This is actually true or not. If you say he is right, it is because the emperor is the highest class in feudal society. He has privileges including collecting taxes, recruiting soldiers, customizing systems, allocating resources, dealing with officials, etc. These privileges can be implemented by the emperor with just one sentence, so the emperor has the attribute of exploiting the people at the bottom, and then Let's talk about the reason why he and the people are in the same class. The reason is taxation and the army. Taxation is the emperor's pocket. It can ensure the emperor's food, drink, and other expenses. Therefore, the emperor must ensure that the people have money and food so that he can maintain the operation of his court. Otherwise, where will the officials' salaries be paid? Therefore, the emperor is not only an exploiting class, but also a self-interested class that promotes the interests of the people. Let's talk about the army. The source of the army is just two words. If the "lower class" emperor wants to maintain the army to maintain external and internal deterrence, he must ensure the interests of the people at the bottom, that is, the upward path is unimpeded. However, the promotion and transfer of the upward path were delegated to civilian officials by the emperor. In order to maintain their own interests, officials have to exploit the lower class and hinder the advancement of the people at the bottom to divide their own interests. Therefore, in movies and TV dramas, we often see the emperor quarreling with ministers over a little money. Why is this so? To put it bluntly, the class is different. The civil servant class is an exploiting class. He can only make himself rich by exploiting the people at the bottom. Otherwise, how long will it take to get rich by relying on the emperor's rewards! The emperor is different. The world belongs to him. Isn't it the same as stealing the emperor's pocket when your civil servants exploit the people at the bottom? And if you copy too hard, the people might send the emperor to the west. Do you understand when you see this? You can be an emperor only if you have the support of the people at the bottom, rather than being the emperor first and then having the support of the people at the bottom.

God TM Yongle Emperor couldn't stand it in the first chapter. I couldn't even write it clearly when I wrote it. Where did Yongle come from half a year after he ascended the throne? Did you seal it?