Are You the One Who Calls Me the Great Director?

1: The point of view is grounded, and the narrative rhythm and character portrayal are supportive (I read books slowly when I feel there is a lot of information).        ： （） Three: Give readers a sense of freshness and a desire to continue reading (the author's comment area discusses the interpretation of domestic and foreign films and TV shows). Four: Urban film and television classification, I think the author's book has routines, is not cliché, has attitude and is fresh! Afterwards, all the recommendation votes will be given, and I will put it on the top of my bookshelf to read it. Come on! ! !

The author's writing style is solid, and he is also very knowledgeable about the film industry. The mood arrangement is reasonable, the events are compact, and the film review is very good. Except for the film-related content that is not very professional (but no one really reads this in the novel), the whole book is very appetizing. It is a rare high-quality product and a new track in the entertainment category. But I still couldn't read it. There is a big poisonous point for me personally. I would like to thank the author for admitting this writing direction in the free chapter. If I catch up with the published chapter, it will be so realistic. From the protagonist vowing not to make movies and quitting the film and television industry forever, to claiming that he will only make one movie in his life... What is the significance of so many "needing a film critic who is not both a 'referee' and an 'athlete' to speak out" advocated in the previous article? If you want to be an opinion leader but talk like farts, no one will listen to you. To use an inappropriate analogy, what is the difference between this and a promise to never change, then a eunuch? Idealistic plots are acceptable. It's a cool story, so it doesn't matter. But "everyone has died since ancient times, and people cannot stand without faith." It is a pity that such a personality stain appears on the protagonist.

The concept is good, but the writing is too young, and I am too lazy to watch it to make myself angry. In addition to The Wandering Earth 2, there are also good movies in China that are more documentary road movies and musicals. I haven't seen a mainland movie in the 21st century for a long time. They are all too lame. The artistic level of foreign classics of the same type is much higher than this. The last time I watched Zhang Yimou's movie was "My Father and Mother". It was a really good movie and told a good story. I didn't expect that it had been so long, and then I was disappointed one after another.

Speed ​​update

Author, you remind me of a person, Lord

One thing that the Chinese film industry and capital are doing is driving away the audience. One is the price of the movie, and the other is values. So now no one goes to the movies. Anyway, I haven't gone to the movies for several years. I am disappointed every time I watch it. I twist my values ​​as hard as I can. I can't stand it.

This book seems like the male protagonist doesn't make movies. The author seems to be deconstructing the movie's cliché of stepping on big names. If this is true, there is no need to set up the Nortel directing department for the male protagonist. This is unnecessary and will instead put a layer of shackles on the male protagonist. For example, if the male protagonist's Nortel teacher asks the male protagonist to stop bombarding people in the industry, will the male protagonist be bombarded or change his career? Since this kind of deconstructive commentary should be written with an outsider and an Internet capital background, so that the male protagonist can do things freely and not care about the idea of ​​​​internal entertainment. Otherwise, if you, an insider, just take advantage of other people to expose the shady story, it is tantamount to backstabbing the entire industry. There is no professional ethics at all. Who would like people who break the rules. To sum up, the male protagonist must have a background or capital, otherwise this kind of male protagonist will not survive for long. The power of capital is like Pandora's box, which is more mysterious and terrifying than you think.

He takes a video blogger too seriously. A lot of people scolded Jinlin Shisanchai and Nanjing Nanjing when they were released online.

I like this kind of Huayu novels so much. Nowadays, Huayu novels always win three Oscars? What era are we in now? Don't you understand foreign countries? For example, in the 90s or 00s of Rebirth, will my director pursue high box office without winning awards? Will he die? It won't be countless capital and coal bosses following you with checks. At most, the old guys attack the awards and say they have no connotation, but is this important to the reborn?

There is no need to read Huayu novels where the protagonist complains about other people's works, because he must have plagiarized other people's works and thinks that his own talents are great. What qualifications does a plagiarist have if he complains about other people's works based on the development of the times? ? ? Still riding a horse to show off that you have three righteous views? ? As long as the protagonist's three views are correct, he is not belittling others and highlighting his own plagiarism, but taking advantage of the gap between the times to lead this group of outstanding people of the era.

I feel like disenchantment is something that people are increasingly exposed to as China becomes more powerful in recent years. The disenchantment of celebrities, the disenchantment of foreign countries, the disenchantment of products, the disenchantment of life, the disenchantment of worldviews. Film and television works have always been a frontline in the struggle for the right to speak of value. I've read a lot of novels about film and television creation, and now it's very good to read novels that focus on film and television reviews. Even if some bad movies have been around for a long time, they are still worthy of criticism. After all, their shooting techniques are really good, and their distortions of values ​​and worldviews are also really distorted.

The author's aggression is too low, and what he considers to be the sharpest and sharpest artillery fire seems to the reader to be coquettish, limp and without any strength. So what was originally a bit of fun turned into frustration. The second point is that the author doesn't understand how to do self-media at all, and the copy he writes is far less interesting than the chapter says, and is very offensive.

Nowadays, some directors' films are just for laughs. They don't understand the audio-visual language and have never experienced the life of a crew. They really think that they can copy classic movies if they know the plot. It's really ridiculous. Moreover, Chao didn't know how to copy good movies. He didn't watch Kubrick, he didn't know about Akira Kurosawa, he didn't know about films by Hou Hsiao-hsien and Bong Joon-ho, and he didn't write about things such as image style and lens performance that are extremely important to the director. It is recommended that before writing a director's article, you should watch a few good films and analyze the lens language of classic films before writing.

The protagonist has offended the film and television industry, can there be actors behind the scenes? Even if you shoot it, what about burning your film? Where are you starring in Car Accident? Will the theater arrange a ghost scene for you? What about coordinating to steal half of your box office? So your movie won't be successful

If you want Westerners to understand what happened in Nanjing in 1937, you must tell it in a "language" that Westerners can understand... Regarding the Thirteen Hairpins of Jinling, there is nothing much to say except Zhang Weiping's saucy operations. After all, it was 250,000 lives. No matter how high the founder and guardian of the international safe zone is, it is not exaggerated. Not to mention Mo Yu's choice, in that life-and-death situation, exchanging my bad life for another possibility should be regarded as a sublimation of life in our traditional thinking!

I found that many Chinese entertainment novels like to write that Chinese movies have high box office overseas, which is too fake. As of June 2026, among all the movies in the world, except for Hollywood movies, there are only 5 movies from all other countries that can exceed US$200 million in overseas box office. "The Intouchables" (box office outside France): $260 million "Your Name" (box office outside Japan): $240 million "Dangal!" "Dad" (box office outside India): US$206 million "Demon Slayer: Mugen Train" (box office outside Japan): US$210 million "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" (box office outside Chinese-speaking regions): US$206 million Strictly speaking, "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" is a Sino-US collaboration. The total number of American films with a box office of >$200 million outside the United States: 706! ! ! Why is this happening? Because the United States is still the cultural center of the world, most foreigners don't like to watch movies from other countries except for their own people. People in most countries around the world are willing to watch American movies. Although American movies have not done well at the box office in China in recent years, most other countries in the world still like to watch American movies. There are still many American movies outside the United States every year, with a box office of more than 200 million US dollars. The main reason is divided according to proportion. Cultural barriers account for 80%, Hollywood distribution capabilities account for 15%, and other reasons account for 5%.

It's understandable to write about Lu Chuan, Guan Hu, plagiarism, and crooked buttocks, but I don't understand why he slanders Zhang Yimou just for the sake of slandering him! ?

There are many problems that I can't figure out, and many bureaucrats are doing it to dig into the foundation of the ruler's rule. No one cares about this kind of thing, but the people at the bottom are opposed. They used to worry about these things, but now after seeing too much, their blood runs cold. Anyway, ordinary people just live and feed themselves, so what are they worried about? Whoever rules is not ruling, as long as they have food to eat, what's the use of worrying about it, other people's interest groups don't worry about it.

In fact, what you wrote before is quite good, but what I don't understand is why you accepted that woman's provocation and went to make a movie. You have clearly said very definitely before that you will not be a director or an actor, but now you seem to have fallen into a self-certification trap. I think you There is a very good metaphor, that is, it is not only the cook who can evaluate the taste of the dishes. In this metaphor, your position is that of the diner, while the position of the so-called industry insiders and professionals is that of the cook. You are obviously here to eat, but now you are the cook.

After talking about Dai Jinhua, the author's butt is also exposed. Movies are a tool for exporting ideology, but the author deliberately blurs this concept and cleanses the West.

What do you want to say? I saw the second video, and it really revealed a lot of Lu Chuan's evil thoughts. It was well-founded and convincing. But at the same time, I also noticed that the pig's feet unconsciously stood on the moral high ground, and it felt like wanting to be a saint. We all know that no one is perfect, and those who stand on the high ground must accept moral torture without exception. The longer they stand, the higher their position will be. The public's moral attitude towards this The more mysophobia gets worse, this time we took advantage of our patriotic sentiments once or twice, of course we don't care, but something will happen in the long run, Lei Jun can overturn, not to mention the pig's feet that are viewed as rape by many angles, the public is like this, they like to create gods, but they also like to destroy gods

After eating, there is nothing to do. Just for pleasure. If you don't want to start a harem, you won't go. Make money instead of enjoying life. Interesting? Writing novels if you don't understand human nature is not in the interest of human nature. Unrealistic and pure fantasy. This should be taken off the shelves.

This is also in the novel. In reality, ordinary people dance so happily that they don't know how to die. Look at how many people have "died" in the fight against dummies.

The ingredients are good, but the cooking skills are not good And they are very insistent on the choice of dishes. They have to make West Lake vinegar fish without adding a drop of oil Why bother? A fresh grass carp was lost in vain

2012, How dare the protagonist? In 2010, Mr. Chai asked the academician openly. What was the situation at that time? Also find out about inter-provincial matters. The essence of society is cannibalism. If the protagonist is not strong enough, he doesn't need a lantern in the toilet.

Why didn't the author and director criticize Ang Lee? Is "Lust, Caution" not up to par?

Chinese entertainment literature, or all novels. I don't want to watch it when I see people betting against each other or making bets at every turn. It's too poisonous.

It doesn't match the spirit of the author. Can't see it.

I can also write this book. I just go to site B to find a video and copy it verbatim. It's your own content

Chapter 1, reborn in 2012, what is a gold mine? Around 2014, the price of a pie was only US$300, and later it was US$130,000, hundreds of times more. In addition to the big pie, Nvidia and Tesla can increase by more than a hundred times in the next ten years or so. If you are a KTV Maiba, you can still learn music knowledge for a few months, then copy the songs, complete the primitive accumulation, and basically become a billionaire or tens of billions later.