Tokyo Film World 1971: Starting with B-Movies

This is not like an entertainment article, but more like a Japanese workplace article. It makes me feel like I am watching Naoki Hansawa here.

Everything is difficult at the beginning, and it is very interesting to write. For movies, it mainly depends on the author's knowledge reserve based on the background of the times and the cultural environment. Many works are filmed in the early stage, and then they play with capital and open a harem in the later stage. I'm really tired of it.

The protagonist didn't find any way out, and turned into a person who lives a peaceful life. He seemed to be unprepared for the bankruptcy of Daying, which is very different from the image in the beginning that he used the crisis to fight for the top.

Also, what do the authors think about the following comments: "The protagonist knew that Daiei was bankrupt but did not prepare for a way out" and "The protagonist has made three masterpieces but no employee knows him"? To be honest, after seeing this comment, I swallowed all the words I wanted to praise. If I had seen it before reading the book, I probably wouldn't have clicked on it at all. It is recommended that the author explain it as early as possible to avoid affecting the score.

The chapters after filming Na Mountain felt different from the previous protagonists. The previous protagonists gave me the feeling that they would not give up until they achieved their goals. They were realistic and calm, and had maximum execution ability. The description of the cruel struggle and atmosphere within the entire Daiying Company also made me feel quite unique. Speaking of which, I personally watched the plot of "Buried Alive" and it was very exciting. The plot after the mountain arrived in Ryukyu was not attractive to me. The localization of the Chinese version of Japan includes beautiful descriptions. I can get the content I want to express, but I can't substitute the wonderful scenes inside and the scenes I created are not exciting, including after the movie was released. After the characters are relaxed and funny, I feel that the style of the book has changed a lot. In my impression, the protagonist has changed from tough, calm and realistic to a bit funny, which is a bit disconnected for me. These are just my personal feelings. I don't know if everyone will like the book more after this change. I hope the author will get better and better. Come on

Movies have an aesthetic threshold, and this threshold is set differently depending on the movie. Some movies and some directors don't set it up at all. The threshold of some movies is the staircase. What is conveyed by audio-visual language can be reflected in the degree of understanding.

The protagonist initially wanted to become famous with a low-cost but advanced storyboard movie, but the result was snatched away by a senior executive. Not only was he unable to direct, but the authorship of the script also belonged to someone else. I read back and found that although the protagonist solved this high-level person (or was no longer stuck by him) after more than ten chapters, he was unable to regain his authorship rights due to various reasons. It is foreseeable that he must become a nationally renowned celebrity to have a chance to clear his name. Before that, as long as he used similar movie lenses, he would be regarded as an imitator, which was equivalent to having an extra "dad" on his head out of thin air. I might be able to watch this kind of plot in front of a mask, but not now.

What I wrote recently is a piece of shit, a waste of money.

The author said that there is no heroine, but it still feels inappropriate.

Can the author respect common sense? Readers have pointed this out to you several times.

Starting from Chapter 75, it feels like someone else has written it.

When high-level officials make things difficult for them, when they make movies, they are oppressed by outsiders. When they make movies, the studio goes bankrupt. When they make movies, they may want to create chivalrous characters and stories that use movies to overcome obstacles and solve all difficulties, but they are too lazy and put the cart before the horse.

What is written here! Opinionated? Do you really think that if you can make a movie and know the plot of a famous movie, you can become famous directly in Japan where class is solidified? What about dreaming? Look at Stephen Chow's Westward Journey. You didn't announce it, didn't distribute it, and didn't have theaters to cooperate with it.

The first one was a normal reaction, but the second one was thinking of a robot that can only make movies, has no emotions, and pretends to be a master.

If the screenwriter and director are not like me, they can work part-time as writers, just like Takeshi Kitano. Japan has very good protection for creative works.

In the 1970s, the only people I knew were Yamaguchi Momoe and Matsusaka Keiko. Sayuri Yoshinaga, known as the most beautiful woman, will get married in a few years. The 1980s were so much better, and many familiar actresses shined during this time!

Personally, I prefer articles without female protagonists. As long as there are no so-called sisters or sisters in the articles, I will give those articles without female protagonists a taste.

Workplace writing disguised as entertainment 😜😜😜

It was so uncomfortable that I ordered it all in one go after reading the content before it was released. But after it was released, it was true that it was hard to describe in one sentence. I read it in half a glance, and I really felt that I was at a loss.

Have you written anything recently about film and television shooting?

There are not enough new movies, the descriptions are not tense enough, and they don't have the energy anymore.

Recently I have read several novels on Qidian. Com about the rebirth of Japan's Showa period. Become a literary giant, become a cartoonist, and become a producer.

I hope the author can write about internal entertainment, and the tricks are not afraid of old age. In the face of the market, only routines can retain people's hearts. Only good results can give positive feedback to the author's creative motivation.