Daming: Did You Really Not Change a Word of the Official Historian's Letter?

You dare to flaunt your character in a book based on fake history or fantasy. This is another rotten scholar who thinks he is doing the right thing.

The purpose of traveling through time is to behead your head. Are you seriously ill? ? Whether a time traveler wants to become a king or a sect, it is a big goal. I looked confused. Are you addicted to beheading? Writing silly glyphs shouldn't be placed in the history category, it won't be fun. Novice author no doubt.

. . . Queen Ma is here, although I know you are imitating the dead advice. . But it's really much different.

Sigh, it's fun for you to travel through time without telling the protagonist and revising history, but I don't understand what your purpose is? Change history? It hasn't changed either? So what's the point of what you wrote?

What's the matter? Were you watching when Zhu Yuanzhang sent Liao Wenzhong to do things? Or are you a mind reader? Just write something random.

I thought I had won a tomato. You are a pig's trotter and you can be resurrected from the dead. Why are you resurrecting Queen Ma? Thief Cao is not like this either. Isn't he an inappropriate and disgusting person?

Typical of making up a novel just for the sake of jokes. The protagonist has no goal. The so-called history revision is simply untenable. A well-operated plug-in that can be worn back and forth is immortal in ancient times. It is completely possible to enjoy the rights of feudal society and enjoy modern conveniences at the same time. And since he is not so ambitious and heartless, and the system has given him such great authority, the protagonist has been watching on the sidelines, completely unlike a normal human being, as if he has been taken away by the system.

The impact of dying so many times on history

What's the cool thing about being a real historian? It was Cui Zhu who killed the Taishi brothers. After the killing, he was exhausted. There were a bunch of historians standing outside the door waiting to be killed. The main focus is on someone who kills you, and I will record my history. Was it wrong for Cui Zhu to kill Duke Zhuang of Qi? Firstly, Duke Zhuang of Qi was immoral, and secondly, Duke Zhuang of Qi committed adultery with Cui Zhu's wife. It doesn't matter if he kills him, but if he wants to show his face by killing the king, it won't do. Writing this kind of novel is quite baffling. The emperors of the Ming and Qing Dynasties killed their ministers as easily as they kicked someone on the side of the road to death. Historians are worthless. So what's the use of insisting on your character? Kill one on the front foot, and there are a thousand historians outside the door. Zhu Yuanzhang dares to kill them for you, he doesn't care. There is no point in dying. The picture below shows the four major Hongwu cases given by deepseek. The approximate number of people killed by Zhu Yuanzhang is 80,000-100,000. Do you think he cares how many times the main character dies? The protagonist is reincarnated once an hour and waits in line to be killed. Zhu Yuanzhang can kill him for ten years.

I laughed at the scene where Zhu Yuanzhang and Zhu Di were fighting each other. I have never seen such a loser. In the end, they forced Zhu Yuanzhang to respect him, saying that it was hard to say whether he would win or lose if his head was sent to Zhu Di. I can only say it was funny. My wife and children are dead, and I have already fought in Kyoto. This time I have to succeed in appeasement and then deal with it severely. As for the Jingnan episode, it's not good for you to let him go through this plot honestly. You insist on fighting each other and don't let anyone go. As a result, Zhu Yunwen still died in the sea of ​​​​fire, and Zhu Di still ascended the throne. The damage caused was even greater, more people died, and Princess Yan was almost killed. His grandson obviously made a mistake, so he insisted on being stubborn. In the first stage, he relied on the idea, killing this and that, but in the end it was Empress Ma who came forward to make him compromise. In the later stage, he relied on the idea, and he would make trouble if everything did not go as he wanted. The writing was not like an emperor, but like a giant baby.

I found that many of the comments that disparaged Lao Zhu failed to understand their own positioning. Those secrets related to big shots have nothing to do with a reader who barely eats three meals a day. How many people at the bottom of the class can be saved by just one act of corruption? Or is Mr. Yuan making you too full to make remarks that are not in line with his class position?

In the 5,000 years of history, there have been very few people who dared to kill historians. The only person who dared to kill historians continuously is Cui Zhu who killed the Taishi of Qi State in succession. No matter who was behind him, he could only kill him for other reasons. The historian is a very special official position. If you kill the historian just because of recording history, do you want future generations to directly abandon the historical records recorded during this period? Then there are a lot of unofficial histories. Lao Zhu is just cruel, not stupid. He has many ways to kill you for other reasons instead of killing you for recording history. It was really because of the chroniclers who were killed in succession because of the record of history, and later someone stood up to record history. To be honest, Lao Zhu really had no choice but to curse and admit it.

The author is very courageous (in a derogatory sense) and dares to make judgments on some controversial events. For example, the latest issue of the North-South Ranking Case concluded that the southern scholars had completely defeated the northern scholars. It was simply that they could not pass the political test and needed to give an explanation to the northern scholars. Frankly speaking, I don't think the author has such writing and research capabilities. Abandoned.

After reading a lot of Chuan Ming's articles, I increasingly like the setting of confronting Lao Zhu. That's how cool it is. Just like I loved the Ergyuehe trilogy back then, but later because I saw too much of the beastly behavior of the Tatars and the fundamental fact of taking Han as slaves, the history of the Qing Dynasty became unreadable. Only "Usurping the Qing Dynasty" is a cool article in the Qing Dynasty. The more I read Zhu Yuanzhang's many histories, I realized that since he moved the temple for Mencius, we can see that his cruelty and unkindness under the obsession with the family world are the three views of a farmer at heart, a three views that are praiseworthy but ignorant and stubborn, a sad, lamentable, ridiculous and despicable three views. So in Hongwu, the only way to feel good is to fight against Lao Zhu. If you kill Xia Minghan, you will always have the funny feeling of someone who comes after you 🪖

I've read the free chapter and I have a question? Where is the fun? There is no problem in revising history, and this angle is also possible, but what changes will be brought back in Ming Dynasty? If not, then I might as well just look at the history of the Ming Dynasty that the Manchus spent hundreds of years compiling. After all, you can't change history, so what should I look at? And what was Queen Ma involved in?

Wasn't Zhu Wenzheng imprisoned? Zhu Chongba didn't kill him. After his death, his sons were still crowned kings.

I don't want to read it anymore. It's not reasonable at all not to tell the reigning emperor in order to write it down.

I actually spent 3 yuan. . .

I probably can't edit it anymore. Without the official history, the author cannot create a new plot.

Before the Ming Dynasty, the emperor was not called "Emperor". In the Song Dynasty, he was mostly called "Guanjia", and in other dynasties, he was often called "Your Majesty". In the Ming Dynasty, the emperor was occasionally called "Emperor", and in most cases he was called "Your Majesty". After Kangxi of the Qing Dynasty, people began to be generally called "Emperor". Princes and princes call themselves: Princes in the pre-Qin and Han Dynasties can be called "Gu", and a few can be called "Ignores". After the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, the title of "Ignores" gradually became exclusive to the emperor, and princes, princes and princes can only be called "Gu" or "I". Song, Yuan and Ming called themselves "I" or "I". Before the Qing Dynasty, princes and princes rarely called themselves "this king". Starting from the Kangxi year of the Qing Dynasty, princes generally called themselves "this king". In ancient times, women called themselves: "nujia" was a modest name for women after the Song Dynasty. Women in the Han and Tang Dynasties more often called themselves "concubine", and noble women could call themselves "I" and "I". Before the mid-Ming Dynasty, most dynasties used copper coins for daily transactions, with very little gold and silver. It was only in the mid-to-late Ming Dynasty that silver became the mainstream currency. -In the late Ming Dynasty, "meeting votes/deposit checks" appeared among the people. There were no unified rules. Most of them were deposits and withdrawals/exchange receipts from acquaintances or local circulation, and were not legal currency. In the early years of Daoguang in the Qing Dynasty (1823): Rishengchang Bank was established, and private banks began to issue standardized banknotes, focusing on cross-regional exchange. They were only circulated in Shanxi merchant trade circles and major commercial ports, and were not yet popular. In the third year of Xianfeng in the Qing Dynasty (1853): the official issued the Ministry of Revenue official banknotes (official banknotes), which were forced to circulate nationwide. At the same time, the network of private banknotes expanded to the whole country, and official and private banknotes ran parallel. The use of banknotes entered an explosive period and became the "starting point of popularization." ​ High-leg tables and chairs only completely replaced the low tables for sitting on the floor in the Song Dynasty. During the Han and Tang dynasties, people knelt and sat on the tables to eat and discuss matters. The furniture was mainly low tables and couches. The memorial system was only established during the Kangxi period of the Qing Dynasty. Officials in the Tang and Song Dynasties used "memorials", "tables" and "statements" when submitting memorials, while in the Ming Dynasty they used "memorials" and "memorials". There is no such thing as "memo" or "zhezi". In ancient formal occasions, the hand-over gesture was performed with the left hand outside and the right hand inside. The right hand outside was a special "unlucky gift" for funerals. "Better greetings" is a unique etiquette of the Qing Dynasty. It was mostly used by subordinates to superiors and juniors to elders. During the Tang and Song dynasties, people often performed cross-hand salutes and bows to greet greetings when they met, and there was no such thing as "sending greetings". Before the Yuan Dynasty, subordinate officials rarely called superior officials "adult". In some dynasties, subordinates called eunuchs "adult", and in some dynasties, they called their parents and elders "adult". Beginning in the Yuan Dynasty, lower-level officials would occasionally call officials of second-rank and above "sir". From the middle and late Ming Dynasty, only officials of third-rank and above would be called "sir" by their subordinates. Officials with lower ranks could not be called "sir". However, in the late Ming Dynasty, there began to appear a few cases where officials above the fourth rank were called "adult". Before the mid-Qing Dynasty, following the rules of the Ming Dynasty, only officials of third rank or above would be called "adult". Starting from the mid-Qing Dynasty, calling officials "adult" gradually became common for lower-level officials. Attention! ! ! What is mentioned above is that lower-level officials refer to higher-level officials. No matter which dynasty, it is absolutely impossible for higher-level officials to call lower-level officials "sir". Some novels even write about emperors or nobles calling other officials "sir". This is simply contrary to Tiangang! ! ! Finally, let's talk about the problem of civilians calling officials Before the middle and late Qing Dynasty, civilians in various dynasties and generations called officials differently, and most of them called them "officials" and "masters". From the middle to late Qing Dynasty, civilians also called officials "adult". {"NickName":"Supervision and Restriction","UserId":406440657}

There is no point in writing about the Ming Dynasty. The author writes about the Qing Dynasty.

I have seen 80 chapters so far, and most of them are self-funded subscriptions. I can't say what this system should be called, but the fact that the same person is reincarnated into the same society with different identities is very similar to the veil of ignorance in philosophy. I think this path has great potential. Whether the Zhu family is reincarnated as historians, civilians, wealthy businessmen or even various ethnic groups, it will help discuss social fairness and legitimacy, at least with good intentions.

I've seen the latest chapter, and the writing is okay. Although there are a lot of typos, the plot is smooth and understandable. However, the emotions of the characters are very extreme. It is related to Zhu Yuanzhang and Ming Dynasty Fenghua. This style is quite interesting.

Don't be a fan of the author, the book is quite interesting.

If the author doesn't update, he'll kill the book. I've only updated one chapter in the past few days. I ran away. Goodbye.

Next time I read a book, I will definitely read the table of contents first. After I subscribed, I found that it will be updated every few days.