Wearing the Qing Dynasty and Not Rebelling? Take California First!

It's the 19th century and you're still trying to summon the souls of the Zhu family. In what age are you still practicing feudal monarchy and capitalism?

The motherland does not need one more emperor, nor does it need one more family tree of slaves with one surname.

California's geographical environment is not much better than Shaanxi's

The writing is so childish! Commerce is not commerce, capital is not capital, and imperialism is not imperialism. Various operations are like a baby wielding various tools at will, a hammer in the east and a stick in the west. In fact, this kind of writing is just a program to unify the Han people, fight against the white people, and win over the Indians. What about you? What are you doing?

First of all, it needs to be made clear that even if combined with the background of Anglo-American relations in the mid-19th century and the pre-Civil War United States, the protagonist's idea of ​​cooperating with the British and transporting Chinese to occupy the western United States is completely unfeasible. 1. The essence of Britain's "interference in the United States" is "interest speculation" rather than "division of American territory" The so-called "interference tendency" of Britain in the United States in the mid-19th century (such as the possible recognition of the Confederacy during the Civil War) was essentially to obtain commercial interests (such as cotton trade) by supporting separatist forces, rather than to "help third parties divide the western United States." For the UK, a "divided but controllable United States" may be in the short-term interests, but "letting an outsider (the protagonist) occupy the western United States" is completely inconsistent with its global strategy. The UK is more worried about its territorial security in North America (such as Canada). If a third party is allowed to establish power in the western United States, it may threaten its North American interests. And the UK will never bear the risk of a full-scale war with the United States in order to "help the protagonist" (this will consume its global colonial resources). 2. The "sovereign binding" of the western United States to the federal government has taken shape and is by no means a "divisible vacuum zone" The western United States in 1853 was not a "terrain" or a "loosely controlled area": - As early as 1848 after the Mexican-American War, California, New Mexico and other western core areas had been officially incorporated into the United States. The federal government had established territorial governments and stationed officials. California even became an official state in 1850; - Mining (such as the California Gold Rush) and agricultural interests in the West have been deeply tied to Eastern capital. A large number of native American immigrants (rather than foreigners) have poured into the West, forming a social structure based on "American sovereignty." The protagonist wants to replace the sovereign identity of native immigrants by "transporting Chinese", which is equivalent to confronting the entire U. S. Federal government and vested interest groups in the West. This is impossible in terms of population, resources, and organizational strength. 3. "Transporting Chinese" cannot be the basis for "dividing the land", but will trigger multiple resistances Even if we ignore the relationship between Britain and the United States, there are still fatal loopholes in the operation of "transporting Chinese to the West": - The U. S. Federal government has clear controls on the "large-scale influx of foreign populations" (such as port customs and immigration policies). Even if Britain secretly assists, large-scale transportation of Chinese will inevitably trigger the vigilance of the United States. In the 1850s, the United States had begun to restrict the disorderly entry of "indentured laborers." The protagonist's behavior will soon be discovered and suppressed by the federal government, and it is impossible to wait until the "population is sufficient to divide the land." To sum up, the United States in the mid-19th century had formed a clear sovereignty framework. British strategic interests, American sovereignty maintenance, and the real situation of immigrants jointly determined that the idea of ​​"dividing the West" fundamentally violated historical logic. Even with the setting of "travelers", it could not break through the rules and power structure of the time.

I haven't read the book yet, but the comment section is already amusing. If it has anything to do with the anti-Qing Dynasty and the restoration of the Ming Dynasty, some people will be anxious to death. 😏

Don't read it. The protagonist is a feudal reformist, a lackey of the landlord class. He is not even a capitalist. He has been appeasing the landlords.

Since I am traveling through the United States, I can just go directly to Guangdong and return to Guangdong Province.

Treat Japan as a place for producing human minerals. Men are brought here to mine and women are brought here to sell.

I think being the emperor is good, but there is no need to surname Zhu and summon the souls of the Ming Dynasty. It is better to start a new dynasty. After all, the Ming Dynasty has no dividends.

The logic is not very smooth in the first place, and it can only be read as a cool article, but you are still so aggrieved, being tricked by the comprador behind his back, having a gun on his head, and then letting him go and continuing to do business with him? ? ?

There is no political wisdom in this novel

Damn, what's wrong? Isn't it harmonious?

Too watery. This book could have done very well, but it's a complete mess. It's only been a dozen chapters and it hasn't been put on the shelves yet, so it's already a mess.

It must be a lot of fun to raise the sun and moon flag in America, especially when the news spreads🤭

You don't have to watch it if you don't like it, there's no need to be dark just for the sake of being dark. If you were really that unbearable, you wouldn't go to pay homage immediately!

In the 19th century, all major powers were basically monarchies, and republics were alien It was also the rising stage of global nationalism At that time, the slogans of anti-Qing and Ming Dynasty were implemented in the north and south. Even if they rebelled, there had to be the greatest common denominator In a time-travel novel, mentioning the Ming Dynasty is like stepping on someone's tail, so why call it

It's written incorrectly. If you write it like this, why did you write California in the first place?

I'm not even interested in the protagonist's name, so why are you planning to use the Ming Dynasty Law System? After more than a hundred years, the old Zhu family has no appeal. Those like the Tiandihui just shout slogans and do their own thing. If you choose this name and conquer the world in the future, will it be yours or not? Regarding the legacy of Lao Zhu's family, should you be the founding king yourself, or should you respect Lao Zhu as the founding king? Will you use the title of Ming Dynasty when the time comes? You conquered the world by yourself and let a dynasty that has finished its game take most of the credit. How do you let readers take in it?

It's a typical example of just working hard to make money. In the future, you can change your account to open a book. This account will definitely protect you from lightning.

Tulimu online writing, the sentences are not smooth

Please give me your opinions and suggestions on the new book, please read it and collect it