Touch the Chord of Time and Space

The history we can see comes from two channels, The first is the first fact, that is, the cultural relics unearthed by archeology, from which we interpret and form our view of history. The second is what the ancients recorded, including inscriptions and books, which allow us to understand history from the words of the ancients. However, both are subjective opinions of people, are they really reliable? For cultural relics, our interpretation must be correct? Are the words of the ancients entirely based on an objective and fair perspective? I can't quite see it So you can't say what I wrote is true, and of course it's not necessarily false. Is history a little girl who can be whitewashed?