You Asked Me to Make Snake, So Why Am I Conquering the Three Kingdoms?

You're copying it, right? You won't even act it out anymore.

Bullshit conspiracy theories, princes with no manners at all, and quarrels in the market. The 18th princes are like shrews. They don't know what can be said openly and what can be said secretly. The princes have no level of speech at all. They also say that the books in the game are true. But these princes have read a book and are not like this. They are people of such a high status and they distribute benefits through quarrels. Do you think this is right? The author should take a good look at it.

How can I put it, writing this kind of novel still requires a certain understanding of history. If you copy the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, you won't be able to understand it. Just use the TV series or the new three content to make up for it. The 18th Route princes' failure to send troops is interpreted by the author as having ulterior motives. If people really have ulterior motives, wouldn't it be better to just grab the territory? Why are you asking Dong? And that Gaixia, with 28 riders surrounded by 100,000 people, right? This is no longer history, this is myth. The Gaixia breakout means Xiang Yu was chased and killed along the way after breaking out. In the end, twenty-eight people were left. There were more than 100,000 troops trapped in Gaixia. I don't understand why the author didn't check any information. If you don't want to read historical records, at least watch the popular science video. It only takes ten minutes.

I'm not a buddy, I'm just a clown. What's the point of this game?

If you want to copy it, can you change it? They are really exactly the same Even the contents of the war zone are copied. Can the tactics of the Cold Weapon Age and Hot Weapon Age be the same? Everything you copied makes me sick

It feels really ordinary. Don't follow the plot of a game. Players are immortal. There is definitely the possibility of changing the ending. It's really funny if you follow the plot. I'd rather watch Romance of the Three Kingdoms to see the plot.

There was a plot in the early stage that was chosen as part of "New Three". This is because the author thought that Shinzo's section was better to develop. In fact, you can see that except for that section, almost all of them are based on Lao San. No excuses, everyone's complaints and criticisms have been received by the author. Would avoid it in the future. At the same time, I would like to thank all readers who tolerated and pointed out problems, which made the author feel warm in his gut. 🫶🏻🫶🏼🫶🫶🏽🫶🏾🫶🏿

Pure plagiarism Not to mention the subject matter, even the plot is the same as "Say Good to Develop Xiaoxiaole, Earth War What the Hell".

Today's books are really like, copy a little bit from the starting point, copy a little bit from the tomato and it will become a new book...

This "xiaoxiaole" model lies first in the title of the book and secondly in the content. The scope delineated by the book title must be small, and the scope delineated by the book title must be entered quickly at the beginning. For details, please see the founder of the "Xiaoxiaole" model - "We agreed to develop Xiaoxiaole, what the hell is World War II" Cool point 1: Watching people from another world being culturally shocked (the biggest joy) Cool point 2: The pleasure of inadvertently learning historical knowledge A few points that must be avoided. The title of the book delineates the Three Kingdoms, so it is best to only write about the Three Kingdoms or its corresponding extension. For example, in the book about World War II, if the author immediately writes about World War I, that is okay. But he wrote about the Chinese War - no. It is okay if your book is about the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, but not World War I, World War II or even ancient Western wars. It is best to only write in the Three Kingdoms. The book World War II is not easy to promote Western culture, but your book can write about Chinese culture through the humanistic situation under the war. In fact, the "Xiaxiaole" model should rely precisely on "cultural invasion", but unfortunately due to the national sentiments of readers, the original point of the "Xiao Xiao Le" is to invade a different world with Western culture, which is nationally exclusive, but it is not so satisfying. It would be too difficult to package it into earth culture. The Three Kingdoms topic you chose is very good and can promote Chinese culture naturally. Poisonous Point 1: Don't write about national emotions in a different world in the context of the future. It's best for the protagonist not to have national emotions. World War II was the protagonist's preferential treatment of a federation like ours, which became a poisonous point. It is best if the Federation you write about is all Chinese culture, or simply all foreign culture. The latter is more refreshing. However, as an author, in the Chinese market, you must be close to the psychological habits of Chinese readers and consumers. It is absolutely unacceptable to flatter foreign countries. This is no longer a poisonous point, but a thunderbolt. Closely grasp the topic of the Three Kingdoms, and writing in detail is the key to success.