Breaking Through Baldur's Gate

Collect it first, why not read it first? Because this profile is easy to understand at first glance!

The writing is good. The current trend is very comfortable for me, a kind-hearted Taft. It's great that the bard can survive even with evil thoughts. It's time to vote hard.

After all, there are very few people writing about BG3. Let me support it first. I will comment later on how the plot is.

This book has been serialized on other platforms. New books are being brewed. I should try to update them at the starting point.

In a sense, it's okay. If it's your first time writing a book, you have some talent.

It depends on whether you can persevere. Many authors have very good writing skills, but they often fail to persevere and end up unfinished. Your writing is not bad. If you polish it a little more, you should be able to make a living from it.

It's rare to see a BD3 fanfic, but to be honest, I've read dozens of chapters in this book and it's really hard to comment on it. It doesn't mean that it's poorly written, but your writing style won't attract readers, and if it's boring, no one will promote it and no one will read it. First of all, it is a group portrait article. The most difficult thing to grasp is that everyone has to write and the pace cannot be slowed down. Moreover, it is not convenient to carry out detailed psychological descriptions. The psychology must be reflected through details. Why bother? There is no need for a novice to try this ultra-difficult operation. Think about it, how many famous group portrait books are there on the market now? Except for A Song of Ice and Fire, most of the group portraits are praises that should be praised. Secondly, there are a lot of dialogues between several time-travelers that have no meaning in advancing the plot or adjusting the rhythm. To put it bluntly, they are all time-travel stories and they are all original characters. No one cares what you were before time-travel (unless you borrow people from other works to time-travel). I know you want to create a fantasy worldview similar to Dragons or Harry Potter that is hidden in the technological world, but the problem is that this so-called worldview has no meaning for Baldur's Gate 3. Third, the focus of narrative is that even if you write a group portrait, not everyone will write it in the same way, and not everyone will tell the plot in the most advanced way like the protagonist. For example, in Jaheira's place, you use the conversation between Jaheira and her family to tell the history and setting. Let's not talk about the problem of unnatural language. This kind of writing method is not pleasing to both sides in the fandom. People who are familiar with the plot just skip it and feel like reading it. People who are not familiar with it feel that the plot is messy. If you are afraid that someone does not know the setting, just put the setting chapter at the front or write a summary of the plot.

First of all, you are a group travel novel, and there is not a large audience for this type of novel. Secondly, you are writing a dnd novel. This type of novel is most taboo about throwing away settings. You can introduce the general framework at the beginning, and then you have to take your time, either as the protagonist or the supporting role, but now that you have written it, the transformation is not easy.

I recommend it. I'm afraid of eunuchs. The beginning is pretty good.

I think there are still some problems with what you wrote. It's not that your writing style is bad, but that when you wrote it, the logic was a bit awkward.

I was addicted to "Civilization 6" diving for two days. Recently, I read my own book before going to bed every day, and I always read the latest chapter second or third. How many people are reading this book again? Timely updates see not many readers, which really affects the author's motivation to update. For friends who are reading this book, can you give me a book review and a recommendation ticket? At least let me know someone is watching.

You let me see it, and I saw it. Do you think I should say it more seriously, or should I say it more lightly?

For example, the connection between these two paragraphs is not very good. It means that the protagonist was saved twice, rather than that the protagonist was saved by this woman

I've been out to play for two days, so I'll temporarily stop updating.

I'm back home. I'll save up my manuscript for two days and then start updating it daily!

When I first started watching it, I asked what happened to the Tang Sect. Wasn't it just the protagonist who traveled through time?

As this is a long-term post, I would like to ask some readers for their opinions. I think the science fiction book needs to be polished. It may take a year to finish writing this book. I need to accumulate some materials first. The person who wrote this book still relied on the game to trick many plots, characters, and scene rhythms. I originally wanted to conceive everything myself, and even if I could borrow from it, I would look for references from unpopular games and other works. What do you want to see?