Eagle from France

4{"TopicId":"586286831142961152","TopicName":"Book Recommendation"}

It doesn't matter if it's a system or not. The main reason is that it's fun to watch. The record cheats don't crash. Also, the war scenes need to be exciting. The historical background just needs to be explained clearly. Also, the author had better provide some power maps.

There is a system that will dissuade some people who love reading historical novels. The risk of traveling through time and becoming familiar with history is already huge.

There is a difference of more than 20 years between the era of Chaliu

The comment section didn't even get to the point. The starting point system flow has been popular for how long, and its acceptance rate is already very high. The problem with this book is not here. The main reason is that his system is too over the top. Not only can it directly summon characters, it can also change the real terrain. It has more than just these two functions, and it seriously conflicts with the theme of the game. Many attributes of the niche subject of foreign history are actually fixed, such as writing style, story atmosphere, politics, war, exotic customs and customs, slow-burning, etc. This book is full of misplaced expectations. Looking at the title, well, it is quite serious, the introduction is barely okay, the writing style is good, and it fits the atmosphere well. Until the next chapter, you can directly summon the troops, and then the next chapter to repair the castle and repair the ruins with one click? ? ? What the hell, exit, unadd to the bookshelf, this is my journey

What to look at without a system? Are you having sex? What age are you in?

The protagonist does the hardest work and suffers the most brutal beatings. What does he gain?

Don't open the system too high, and don't let the protagonist summon tens of thousands of elite soldiers through the system. To be honest, in reality, as long as you have more than 1,000 or even hundreds of absolutely loyal people, using them as nodes, you can easily win even in the ancient times in China.

This is why only the Kingdom of Luomadi is left, which is neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.

Can you go to Ming Dynasty and ask Ming Dynasty to sign an unequal treaty?

You already have a system, but you're still stuck in France with no ambition at all? If there is a system, all civilizations should write your name into the textbooks.

In Chapter 40, the protagonist led seven to eight hundred noble private soldiers to defend the city, but 3,000 citizens broke through the city wall and captured the palace. He fled out of Paris in panic. As for the ability to defend the city, I haven't figured it out yet. Chapter 60: Dare to promise to lead thousands of people to defend the city for a month in the face of an army of 40,000. Don't be embarrassed by the protagonist's military abilities. The troops are 1 to 4, and they can't even defeat civilians. You still dare to play a high-end game with a strength of 1:40?

It would be fine to reverse Mongolia's Western Expedition and conduct an Eastern Expedition.

The protagonist leads seven to eight hundred noble private soldiers to defend the city and fight. Breaked by a mere few thousand mobs. Don't be a military aristocrat with a dish like this.

Come on, author, please post more updates soon.

It's mixed with magic and I can't stand it anymore.

How do those who say there is a system but don't look at it plan to treat colds and fevers? Bloodletting or drinking "holy water"?

What a positive energy. In the first 18 chapters, the village is burned down. Isn't it worth losing all the honor in the cavalry?

The map doesn't show where it is and I'm confused. It's too discouraging.

Hello author, I am a new reader and I like your book very much. I would like to ask if the length of this book can be longer? I hope to write at least 3.5 Million words, thank you🙏

I don't remember that Capet had this branch and could be king through the Frankish king-selection system. After all, it was the French who had the advantage at the time.

Why don't the recent ones have chapter names?

Unless you are writing about ancient times and do not involve the whole world, writing about foreign history will be very difficult to substitute into it, especially in modern history. If you make France stronger, it will be seriously detrimental to China, and the sense of substitution will seriously conflict with the position. Let alone writing about the protagonist helping China in foreign countries, the difference is still very big. After all, leaving behind good institutional rules and heritage is equivalent to using the protagonist's modern knowledge to revolutionize Europe, making it more difficult for China to catch up. In reality, the modern revolution in Europe was not complete, and only then did China have the opportunity to catch up. Capital is equivalent to a different kind of aristocracy, so compared to China, Europe and the United States have not experienced revolution. The protagonists must be more advanced social systems and transformed people's thoughts. Thoughts are related to culture, and culture is related to civilization. Certain advanced cultures can more effectively promote the development of science and technology, just like China's current social system and culture have made China superior to the European and American capital systems, and more powerfully promote the development of science and technology, and China mobilizes social resources more powerfully and quickly than Europe and the United States. So what should I do if I always think of China when I read about modern times in foreign countries? If you write about Southeast Asia, it is at least close to China and it makes sense that you can unite China to fight against Europe and the United States. This reason is more suitable for the early rise of the East and the dominance of the East in the world. It is far-fetched to write about Europe and the United States helping China in modern times. If they do not help, it will be difficult for China to catch up with Europe and the United States, which will conflict with the readers' position.