The Revolt of the Three Feudatories: Chronicles of the Qing Empire

Do traitors specialize in writing about traitors? In addition, who "historians say Wu Sangui did not kill Emperor Yongli" dares to reveal his name.

The world is upside down, and there is no distinction between black and white. Could Wu Sangui be your ancestor? They saw that the Manchu and Qing Dynasties had revived, and thought that such a notorious thing could also reach the level of elegance, right?

The author said that he doesn't like the Manchu and Qing Dynasties, but how can one tell the difference between Wu Sangui and the Manchu and Qing dynasties when they are mixed together?

The introduction is all low-level sophistry that avoids the important and takes the easy. Wu Sangui's personal killing of Yongli is regarded as folk art processing, but there is no problem that Wu Sangui was the absolute main force in the Qing Dynasty's destruction of Yongli's court. Does it matter whether he killed Yongli Emperor himself? Even if Wu Sangui's soldiers killed Wu Sangui, wouldn't he be able to kill him? To take a step back, even if the Eight Banners soldiers killed Yongli, it would not affect Wu Sangui's tribe as the main force in destroying the Ming Dynasty. Let's talk about Liaodong's arrears of wages. What does the arrears of wages have to do with you, Wu Sangui? It was the low-level Qiu Ba who was owed pay. How could a senior officer like Wu Sangui, who drank the blood of soldiers, still be owed pay? Are you a salaried person empathizing with the salaried person? Wu Sangui opened Shanhaiguan, which was even more of a traitor. Li Zicheng did not deny Wu Sangui and his son the title of marquis. If Li Zicheng insisted on killing Wu Sangui's family, Wu Sangui could be forgiven for leading the way to the Qing Dynasty. However, in fact, he did not. It is disloyal to lead the way to the Qing court, and it is unfilial to lead the way to the Qing court, which led to Li Zicheng destroying the entire Wu family. In what era can we still clean up such an unfaithful and unfilial warlord leader? Besides, Wu Sangui's rebellion was not because the vassal was about to be withdrawn. Do some people really think that Wu Sangui raised troops for the Han family's clothes? Isn't it funny to say this when you look at Wu Sangui's hairstyle?

I'm here specifically to export my opinions and personal stuff, not to tell stories. There's no need to watch it. I don't even know where my ass is.

I can't stand even a Manchu, washing Wu Sangui! Despite all kinds of rebellion, he was still loyal to the Ming Dynasty. Was he a descendant of the Zhu family who ascended the throne in Nanjing? The person who came to Nanming in the future was not a descendant of the Zhu family! It doesn't matter whether he kills Emperor Nanming or not, what matters is that he is disloyal!

No matter how much you wash, you can't wash away the traitors like Wu Sangui and Hong Chengchou.

No, why is there still someone washing Wu Sangui? Is the author the reincarnation of Wu Sangui?

Qin Hui only gave Wu Sangui shoes to carry, so no one would clear his name. . .

I remember you. Your previous book "Fan Chaos" was a bit difficult to deal with. Why does your new book include Wu Sangui? It's surprising that your grades are so good. If you like studying the San Francisco Rebellion so much, why not just write an anti-Qing article? What about Wu Sangui? He likes to be a niche brother and write niche articles, right? Do you want people who read online novels to introduce Wu Sangui, a traitor recognized by society? Even if you can say that you have written down the so-called historical truth, who can bring it in? If you like niche literature, eat niche literature. The last book said that the results were too poor, and now I have to write another one with the same theme. And then the introduction seems to be in line with the readers. Apart from attracting people like me who don't want to click the book after reading the introduction, what else can it attract? Difficult to stretch