
Let Me Guard the Lonely City. Is It Reasonable for Me to Recruit Players?
让我守孤城,我招募玩家很合理吧
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 452k Words
- Genre
- Gaming
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Game Otherworld
- Updated
- 1y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
0Monthly votes
4.2kRecommends
6.9kFans
148Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
Let Me Explain the Guarantee
I Developed the Three-Body Problem, and Players Recharged While Scolding Me!
CS: Start by Creating a Genius Character
CS: I'm a Fan, What the Hell Is the Shrimp Fishing System?
If You Are Already an Adventurer, Who Should Work Hard on Your Own?
What Do You Mean the Games You Make Are All Real? !
I'm Already a Nascent Soul, You Say I Haven't Traveled Through Time?
The Artist Begins in Prison
Traveling at the Same Time: Great Love to the Heavens
Father-In-Law, Are You Really Good at These Martial Arts?
There Is No Way My Evil Repelling System Will Be Useless
National Tower Defense: Are the Undead Weak? Have You Ever Seen a Natural Disaster?
If you die, you have to open a new file. If you inherit nothing, are players still not afraid of death? Funny? Even if everyone starts the war with a blank slate as soon as the server is launched, it is still possible. But as long as someone survives the first battle and gets the battle merit, and fights again, the player with the battle merit will definitely fail. Even if you lose the battle, the entire game will not be lost.
Good guy, he pissed off the emperor, was sent out to lead the border troops, and was able to recruit his own troops.
Is this the kind of game where you write a lot of chapters and don't even have hundreds of players? . . . , I don't even want to complain after watching this type of player flow. There are only a few hundred players defending the city, which is not called fighting, but fighting.
It is well known by other soldiers that spreading beans can lead to soldiers.
Good guy, everything has been exposed. Find someone to kill you.
The author should change it
Author, you kind of take it for granted. Players are not afraid of death because they can be resurrected without damage or lose experience points or other items. It is impossible for players to be so desperate if they die all over again. If you change the focus of death punishment and keep some things, it is okay. Players cannot be afraid of death if they die again.
If you die, open a new file. If you are not afraid of death, you will not exist.
If you die and start over, the cost is too high, and the advantage for later players is gone.
Players who defend this kind of city are still very fragile. Instead of casting a wide net to recruit more players, they train more and wait for the city to be destroyed and people to die?
If a good guy dies, it will be restarted. I don't know if it's extraordinary. I'll wait and see. Anyway, if it's dead, it'll be restarted.
I haven't read the introduction yet, but I think it's okay (?) I'm thinking this is not about defending a city or something? There are also demon sieges and so on, so you have to contribute something, right? This is directly bound to the player account, which means that the character created by the player will still contribute points after death. Then there is still time to play, otherwise what would be the point to play? And this has a training system, right? That is to say, you can practice (I really don't watch it if you haven't practiced) You may have to consider balance and other reopenings later, and you can't help but fight in the early stage, right? Then let's see how the author handles the data balance after the player dies.
It's a bit outrageous. The protagonist is practicing Qi and the heroine is a golden elixir...
When can I get ahead with two chapters a day?