The Middle Ages Begin with Grave Digging

I like to use the most concise words to express the most intuitive feelings. I have read Chapter 55 so far, and the following are my personal subjective feelings: the overall writing is smooth, the protagonist's actions are clear and logical, not sloppy, and neat. When killing bad guys, use cruel methods to eliminate the root causes without leaving any further consequences. I appreciate this very much, it's a cool point. But what satisfies me most about this book is that it does not contain those bad words used by studio writers such as "Bait teeth, cold snort, touching nose, hot knife cutting butter, ice-cold muscles and jade bones, cherry lips, slightly tilted". Moreover, the author's handling of emotions is very consistent with the intuitive reactions of normal people. The male and female characters in it are all normal people and have a sense of proportion in expressing their emotions. Not being able to see the opposite sex is like losing your humanity and only remaining animalistic. All in all, there is no poisonous point at present and it is worth reading. (Come on, author!)

I'm curious because I don't want the protagonist to be a priest, I want the protagonist to be a knight and a noble. Then why do I have to arrange for the protagonist to have a gravedigger and be adopted by a bishop? I originally thought that the protagonist would take the priest's route. Then it would be better to arrange for the protagonist to be adopted by a knight, or just a commoner. The author still needs to clarify whether there is any foreshadowing, otherwise it will feel a bit unnecessary.

Although the protagonist is capable, but does not have the matching status, he still causes trouble. This will bring disaster to himself and the master's family, just like virtue does not match the position.

I took a look and it mentioned numerical values, so would the author explain the numerical range for ordinary people? Let us find out what level the protagonist is now

Is it a hegemony article or another professional adventure article.

Please ask for daily reading, recommendation votes, and monthly votes!

Author, do you dare to swear on your own severed chirp that you are not the trumpet of the author of "I Beheaded for Twenty Years in the Middle Ages"? How many times have you been a eunuch?

Traveling through the Middle Ages, you have a system to become an all-powerful superman. The early plot did not falter, the killing was decisive, and it was fun all the way to the end Until a key decision was made, what path should the protagonist take in the future? Priest (faith), knight (force), noble (royal power) Priest: The path of faith has a special status. To some extent, it is above the king. It is also in line with the protagonist's starting point - an orphan adopted by a priest. But the protagonist feels that the upper limit is low and unsatisfactory Knight: Relying on force to conquer the world, loyal to the lord, and then have the opportunity to become a noble, which is also in line with the protagonist's all-powerful superman plug-in. But the protagonist feels unreliable and does not want to be loyal to others Noblesse: The road to kingship, many medieval novels will start like this. But the family is born into a noble family, but the protagonist is not. But the author arranged for the protagonist to save a declining female aristocrat, which looked good, but what about the actual situation? The protagonist is too arrogant. Since the protagonist wants to take the road of nobility, then the protagonist must pay something, or be patient enough, first become a knight, and then plot against the nobility. Either he is ruthless and tries his best to marry this female aristocrat and conquer the world after inheriting the territory But the protagonist is too arrogant. Saving the female aristocrat is purely a moral attack. Even in the end, the female aristocrat has been sent to the territory. The protagonist does not force payment, even if the other party repays his favor and runs away, he does not realize what the female aristocrat means to him at all After that, the author continued to work hard and arranged for only women to die in the female aristocratic family. Her sister saw that the protagonist was a commoner and wanted to suppress the protagonist. As a result, the protagonist did not tolerate her at all and scolded her to tears This is also the second problem. The author did not grasp the balance between pleasure and history. The author wanted to write that the protagonist argued with reason and suppressed a nobleman without suffering any losses, which is the kind of royal novel and Long Aotian feeling But I really wasn't sure. The protagonist has always been cautious, saying that he was prepared for the female noble to turn her back on her. Afterwards, he installed Long Aotian's standards, lost his caution, and directly retaliated against the nobles as a commoner. Now that it's over, does anyone still remember that the protagonist's goal is to become a noble? In conclusion, the author wants to write about Long Aotian, the invincible kingly protagonist. But the setting is set in the Middle Ages, and the protagonist is a civilian. In the end, he was reluctant to let the protagonist be cruel and do whatever it takes to achieve the goal. In the end, I wrote that it was a bit different. It can only be said that it is not easy to write a perfect protagonist. The protagonist's personality, background, and world view must be well matched.

Did you write about the executioner? I remember your girlfriend appeared in the comment area. She is so enviable😐

Cut? No development direction? Still have a cold

This guy is finally a eunuch. Over 100 chapters and not much has changed.

The writing is quite good, not many medieval novels, but it is very good up to chapter 70. I hope it won't stop updating.

It's just a little bit lacking, no flaws.

The writing is pretty good, but it's not popular.

I stayed up late to read the new update. Except for the repeated passages in some chapters, it is still very interesting. It is much smaller than the Executioner's book. It should be a weak plug-in. I just have a small question: In the West, aren't women able to inherit titles?

I remember reading this book before. Did the author rewrite it?

There are not many books about the Middle Ages, and the authors just need not be eunuchs.

The author has a certain understanding of the customs and customs of the Middle Ages. The rhythm of the plot up to the latest chapter is also good. The writing style is excellent and the writing is smooth. The story is rigorous yet humorous. The only shortcoming seems to be that the results are average and make people worry about whether they can persist.

Do all the novels you open have multiple female protagonists?

The protagonist's birthday is the same as mine, Nanbeng

Career and development directions are contradictory!

What a miserable author, five monthly passes

The author makes a lot of dirty jokes, which is really good

It has been repeatedly described that the protagonist looks like a Roman nobleman