Anomaly Containment: The Lucky One in the Cage

Authors who write this kind of foundation-type novels always like to describe human nature. As a result, the human nature they express is one-sided, distorted, and unrecognizable to readers. The author is still complacent and thinks he has written a theory that can convince most people. In fact, it is very annoying, because 99.99% Of human problems are caused by differences in perspective. Two people with different perspectives will only get two different results when they discuss their views on the same thing. Then the author wants two people with different perspectives to empathize with the same thing, which makes it very fragmented from the reader's perspective. The author's perspective is the plot of the entire novel. The supporting characters and the protagonist are just pawns to promote the plot and complete a story, so the author's perspective is multifaceted. But the reader's perspective follows the protagonist, and the supporting characters are just passers-by on the protagonist's growth path from the reader's perspective. The difference arises at this time... For example, the author talks about the trolley problem. The author sometimes switches the perspective of the protagonist, sometimes switches the perspective of the supporting character, and sometimes switches the perspective of God to promote the plot. Therefore, when the protagonist is the one who is sacrificed, the supporting character can find what he thinks is a reasonable reason for the protagonist to agree, accept or understand. The reader's perspective is always on the protagonist, and the reader's only thought is: "I don't know you, why should you sacrifice me? If the world is destroyed, it will be destroyed. I can't live, the world still wants to live? I love you to death." Just like the movie "749 Bureau", the director abused the protagonist who can only save the world in various ways in the early stage, and then wants the protagonist to save the world. People who watch it are about to have cerebral hemorrhage... If the protagonist does not destroy the world, he has a good temper.

All I can say is that for some people, it's okay if you like Blue and White Club. But if you want to forcibly graft the setting of a fan work onto the original work, that is simply wrong. You are no longer discussing, you are just having a seizure 😅

Shouldn't the fundamental problem of an organization like the Foundation be the sacrifice of oneself and the sacrifice of others? Those who sacrifice themselves are called heroes. And sacrificing others, even sacrificing death row prisoners, is a typical example of treating people as consumables. You can shoot a death row prisoner directly, but treating him as experimental consumables without his will is essentially treating people as a resource. Isn't this a typical Western philosophical thought, which believes that humans are animals that need to be managed. But our ancestors also proved that if you stand on the side of the masses, the masses will also be on your side. So the fundamental problem of the Foundation is that a group of superheroes who are moved by themselves to sacrifice others protect the world in the dark, but are not willing to let all humans around the world become real heroes and pool their efforts to protect the world in the light?

Hurry up and let the protagonist know what he is doing 🙄 (ps: Although from DD's perspective, the current story development logic is okay, the monkey's behavior of playing with rockets affects the perception to some extent) pps: That bad doctor has private contact with the contained object. Is it really okay? 🤔(Pure question)

Wc, now I can actually write foundation articles. Let me try it out as a divine farmer.

I couldn't hold on any longer... I forced myself to finish watching Hua's plot, but I couldn't understand what it was about... Since I joined Abel's team, all the plots have begun to feel patchwork and fragmented, which is completely contrary to the Foundation theme I want to watch.

I couldn't stand the psychiatrist part in Chapter 9. The author seems to have no idea what he is writing. His position is repeatedly pulled between the outsider and the character, and he wavers between being himself and empathizing with others, making the core logic of the plot untenable. From the standpoint of a D-class personnel, you must be dissatisfied with the oppression and want to resist. After the resistance is successful, you will stand on another position and then consider other issues. As a D-class personnel, it makes no sense to try to empathize with the Foundation, because from the Foundation's standpoint, there is nothing wrong with doing so. Sacrifice some mice to ensure the peace of the world. This is justice and is beyond reproach. But from the perspective of D-class personnel, the Foundation is a heinous oppressor. When writing a novel, you must firmly stand for the protagonist and consider issues from the protagonist's perspective. Don't put yourself in the role and try to evaluate the behavior of the characters in the story from a third-party perspective. This will cause a misalignment between the reader's position and the character's position, making the plot conflicts sticky and childish, and not concise and straightforward at all. As a D-class personnel, there are only three choices: 1. Be willing to sacrifice for the sake of justice, 2. Live in an ignoble way, 3. Stand up and resist "I want to destroy this unfair foundation." As for whether to take over the foundation after the rebellion is successful, and whether to reform, these are all matters for later. It is possible that the dragon-slaying demon will eventually become a dragon, or it may create a new system and era. Biblical debate has no meaning. It is just a waste of readers' time by inflating the number of words. The protagonist should make his position clear, have his own goals, and pursue this goal firmly.

I admit that the Foundation is indeed very good and great, and is a star that protects mankind But the protagonist is a D-class personnel, a consumable to be consumed, a filler baby. To put it bluntly, you have become a D-class, and all the prosperity outside has nothing to do with you. This also requires D-class personnel to help the foundation and serve as cannon fodder, which is pure moral kidnapping. I have read several books about the Foundation. They all started out as being persecuted by the Foundation as a D-class, and finally joined the Foundation as a dog. It was boring. If the Foundation wants to protect humanity, then it should protect itself. If it involves me and sacrifices for the sake of the greater good, then I will definitely break out with you and use everything I have to fight against you. The protagonist himself, a time traveler, has no relatives or friends to protect, and he is still being used as consumables at gunpoint. Why should he give his all to help strangers from another world (still at gunpoint) There is a sentence in the book, you can either eat chaff in prison, or drink tea in the office, and I add, you can also tear down the house and become a master!!

I feel like the protagonist is just a cjb. On the one hand, he doesn't agree with the foundation's approach, and on the other hand, he can't come up with a new solution. It really doesn't work, so just write a deus ex machina.

After seeing the train problem, I was confused. Of course there is no solution in the Western thinking... It's the same as whether the omnipotent God can make stones... It's something that can be solved very easily.