Good Morning, Great Ming

Sigh! The beginning was good, but why did it get more and more childish as it went on? First, they viewed things in black and white, seeing the entire scholar-official class as a malignant tumor. Second, they treated improving the army's combat effectiveness as child's play, believing that simply applying some methods from later periods would transform the army.

The whole plot feels like it revolves around the protagonist doing something, the enemy thinking they've got a brilliant plan, only to be proven wrong in a twist of fate, and so on.

I'm still reading it, and I just want to ask, is this a book by Jazz? I won't even mention the numerous writing errors—water, water churning and turning, no, it's the sea! Embarrassingly, the pretentious posturing and face-slapping are so clichéd, and the character development isn't as good as in his previous books.

Oh my god, Jazz, you finally released a new book! I've been following your series since junior high, from "The Warehouse to the Ming Dynasty," to "The Great Man of the Northern Song Dynasty," and then to "The Rebellion." Back then, as a student, I couldn't afford it and could only read pirated copies. Now I can finally support you! 😭

You don't even have a warehouse or dock, yet you dare to travel back to the Ming Dynasty like Fang Xing?

Gunpowder was already widely used during the Ming Dynasty, especially since Emperor Yongle had a special Shenji Battalion that used it extensively in the process of eliminating the Manchus. It's as if no one had ever seen gunpowder before.

"The Rebellion" wasn't very good; it seems you were aiming for a film or television adaptation. Hopefully, this one will be different.

First, they asked, "Have you heard?" Then everyone was shocked, only to be proven wrong. Second, the psychological descriptions should cover all the characters' thoughts. Third, even though the protagonist has succeeded so many times, there are still people who don't believe it.

The chapters about gunpowder were a bit insulting to the readers' intelligence. Historical fiction should at least have some common sense; this made it impossible to connect with the characters.

That's disgusting 🤢 The way you portrayed her makes readers feel annoyed with her, and consequently, with the book itself. What kind of character are they trying to portray?