
To Revive the Han, Start with Dong Zhuo
中兴大汉,要从董卓做起
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.9M Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Qin-Han & Three Kingdoms
- Updated
- 1y ago
- English
- Request a translation
Synopsis
Stats
649Chapters
10.9kRecommendations
145.5kFans
More by this author
In booklists 2
Readers also read
Emperor of Longevity: Emperor Xian of Han
Do We Not All Have the Same Blood?
Aren't You the South American Tyrant? Why Are You Fighting the Empire?
Great Han: I Kicked Liu Bang Out of the Car from the Start
In the Americas, From Security Guard to Call of Duty
The Han and the Traitor Cannot Coexist, the Royal Cause Will Not Cower in a Corner
Three Kingdoms: Me? A Master Strategist Who Never Misses?
A Literary Master in Ancient Greece
League of Legends: Being an Honest Support Is Boring, Isn't It?
Great Ming: I Asked You to Die in Protest, So Why Did You Really Die?
Three Kingdoms: The Hidden Chancellor of Ji Han, Conquering the Central Plains
In the Hongwu Era, Starting Out as a Rebel
Reader comments 42
Google Translate












As the Han emperor, I don't understand why he would hate the gentry. The gentry were the loyal defenders of the Han Dynasty. Without the gentry scattered throughout the country, the Han Dynasty would have been usurped long ago. To kill Dong Zhuo, the gentry from Guanzhong fought bravely to protect the Han emperor.
If one day Dong Zhuo's subordinates were to force him to wear the imperial yellow robe, how would the author handle this contradiction? Now that the author has defeated Dong Zhuo's enemies, and Dong Zhuo is uncontrollable, is it simply a matter of forcibly defining Dong Zhuo as a loyal minister? Or the Duke of Zhou?
Both Dong Zhuo and Sima Yi have been whitewashed. Honestly, I don't believe it. Their images are too deeply ingrained in people's minds. It's like saying now that Ximen Qing was actually an upright person...
I just feel like the author portrayed Dong Zhuo as too innocent and naive. Seriously, could someone who rose from the border to the political center really be that stupid? I actually think that aside from moments of folly, he was probably quite shrewd most of the time.
Having traveled back in time, he was completely assimilated, forgetting all about the modern civilization he was born into. He saw himself as a supreme emperor, treating everyone else as his private property. He constantly referred to himself as "I," and was quick to execute entire families. I saw the shadow of Zhu Yuanzhang and the later Li Longji. It's disgusting; I hope I never encounter such a person in reality. Such a treacherous mind.
I came here to witness the revival of the Han Dynasty, the Industrial Revolution, the unification of the world, and the journey to the stars, not to read your love stories.
It's so fake.
The text says that Dong Zhuo had no sons, but in fact he did have sons. Also, Dong Zhuo murdered Liu Bian, so he was not someone who only wanted to be a powerful minister. Furthermore, how could the protagonist, a puppet emperor, order a eunuch to convey an imperial edict to Lü Bu?
When it comes to the emperors of the Han Dynasty, you have to look to the Western Han Dynasty. They had such a comfortable life as emperors. The emperors of the Eastern Han Dynasty were so pathetic that they didn't even want to be dogs.
Dong Zhuo has been whitewashed too much; he was truly cruel. Lü Bu, on the other hand, might have been a better person; he just wanted to be a high-ranking official and enjoy life.
From the synopsis, I thought the male lead was Dong Zhuo, who would then assist the gender-swapped Liu Xie. But then I saw the character cutouts saying the male lead was Liu Xie and the supporting male lead was Dong Zhuo… sigh, I left disappointed.