The Children’s Six-Dimensional Charts Are Out, and Their Dads Can’t Sit Still

I think Yang Guanggong has always been illiterate in history. Which imperial examination was held by him? That was his father Yang Jian, and his science at that time needed to be promoted through official promotion, so I gave him the great credit. The Tang Dynasty revised it, the Song Dynasty was complete, and the Ming and Qing Dynasties were the peak. The Sui Dynasty's credit is not only the right to name, but also the goods of the Grand Canal that could not be used in the Song Dynasty. We now use Kublai Khan's Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal to bully others because they are Mongolians, and then blame his achievements on others.

There were no chairs in the Qin Dynasty, so Qin Shihuang would sit on the dragon chair.

Fusu was raised by a Confucian family. He was no better than Zhu Yunwen when he came to power.

That sentence about Yuan Shao in the copy, what kind of fake historical brainwashing article is this? Cao Cao and Cao Pi were not stupid.

Crooked, too crooked. This book feels very abrupt when it appears at the starting point, giving people the feeling of a husky among the wolves.

It's too watery. I want to see the reactions of each emperor and the changes in history. I don't want you to show me the text version of the historical documentary... There is no useful information.

It is almost impossible to write a novel with this theme to be brilliant, because most authors simply do not have enough knowledge reserves and writing power to depict the most dazzling generals and emperors of different dynasties. Moreover, the introduction of this book has the feeling of a novice. New authors are recommended to start writing from one dynasty first to accumulate knowledge and writing power.

The biggest problem in writing historical texts is that they are controversial, and the bigger problem is that reality is crucified. If you bring some personal bias, you will only displease both sides. Based on the education of modern life and the understanding of history, if you write about those monarchs who reformed their past mistakes and compared the development of Yang Yong and Yang Guang, is the writing power of the novel author comparable to that of the history books? Don't be too impatient. When the time comes, write it down, let alone read it. Even if you don't get criticized, it's fine Because some things are destined to die. This kind of history-related writing can fill regrets and find new directions. But if it turns out to be good, then write in that direction! It turns out that the difference is just to play around less, and don't be too confident in your writing and ideas! Don't think about writing about comparisons between Yang Yong and Yang Guang. You have to write well, and you should become platinum! Be down-to-earth. Writing novels is a dream, but the development of industry and career must be down-to-earth. Some of them are dedicated to the Ming Dynasty. Each emperor can write millions of words about the past, and there are so many famous examples from five thousand years ago, one by one. Maintain the current rhythm, get rid of the poisonous points and shortcomings of the live broadcast style, develop and mature, and write new ideas A quality product cannot escape When doing a practical question, writing about certain characters, do you like to read it? A brief popularization, those princes are okay Let's assume here, if you must write about some characters that not many people know about history, or have little impact, will many people read it? Is there a large audience? It's thankless I'll give you an example, Zhu Biao, if he lives a long time, he will definitely be the emperor, but if you write about him, on the one hand, there are few historical materials, and the character is uncertain, and there will be more original content. On the other hand, you know him mainly because he is Lao Zhu's own son and he thinks a lot. Do you really want how many people like to read his content? Writing a book is about exploiting strengths and avoiding weaknesses. Internet articles are popular products, and it is best to write something that everyone likes to hear and see. So it is okay to write about Cao Cao and Liu Bei, but there is no need to pay attention to Yuan Shao With this space, you can write about the Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties. If you write original things, the effort and reward are not proportional at all The choice of topic when writing a novel is also very important! Otherwise, why doesn't anyone write about Indian Dynasties? There is really no need to write some characters that no one cares about. You should consider taking care of the feelings of the largest audience

Hahaha, Li Shimin killed his brother and imprisoned his father. The result here is that Li Jiancheng is incompetent. It doesn't matter that he is under house arrest. He wants to make Li Shimin the prince. 6

It's a pity that the title of the book conflicts with the writing method The content is quite substantial and contains practical information. Unlike other live broadcasts of Dynasties, which only have a low number of words and are empty and boring. Unfortunately, it is also a live broadcast of Wan Dynasties. This subject is destined not to be well written, because the steps are too big and we have to write about each dynasty. The reaction of those people on behalf of those people is destined to be written very casually I don't know if it is the author's trumpet that spoils the history from the beginning of the Three Kingdoms. The name is quite similar. If not, you can actually imitate him and only write about one dynasty at a time. Each dynasty has more than ten kings. Their descendants are enough for you to write.