Great Qin Dharma Sage

I recently read the comments and found that some people said that anyone who writes about the pursuit of equality in feudal society can discard this novel. After I saw it, I felt very sad. The world is indeed unfair, and you can withdraw it here. I worked hard to write the outline, write the ending, and plan for several months to write this novel, but you just downplayed my efforts and directly negated them. This is unfair. If you don't like it, you don't have to read it, but don't mess with it. If you like it, you can correct it and I will correct it. Equality is never achieved overnight, do you know that? Everyone else is confused? I have also seen some people say that under the First Emperor, everyone is equal, but that is not equality. The last sentence of the introduction, the peak of power, is not called the peak when it is under one person, but it is when it is above ten thousand people. I wrote a little too much, and even revealed a little bit about the finale, but it does make me uncomfortable to see others denying my hard work. Please remember those vicious readers that no one is stupid in this world. When you want to criticize others from a high point, you are standing in an unequal position with others. What face do you have to say equality?

Shang Yang and his reform measures were filled with bottomless malice towards people. He used the most direct and naked method of "tiring the people, humiliating the people, obscuring the people, weak people and the poor". For the first time in history, the powerful saw that people can be so mean and power can be used in this way. The so-called "people are difficult to treat" is just because people are human beings, not animals. After the rulers used their power to reduce the human species to the status of animals, no one in the Qin State, except the King of Qin, was worthy of being called a human being. This disaster has lasted for thousands of years, and its impact is so far-reaching that it can be said to be devastating to this day. Therefore, Shang Yang deserves to die, and the Qin Dynasty deserves to die. Whoever created the figurines has no descendants?

After reading this book, I always felt that the protagonist was in a hurry. When he came to Qin, he thought about reforms. He always thought about success in everything he did, and never considered the consequences of failure. Although people took the blame every time in the book, in the final analysis, it was because the protagonist was too anxious. It's okay to be hasty when doing ordinary things. It's okay to be radical. But being so radical in military affairs is completely the second choice of Yang Guang.

Was it difficult to have peace and equality for everyone more than two thousand years ago? Very difficult. But if it succeeds, the present two thousand years will be feudal dynastic slavery.

If the author really wants to retain the goal of equality, then he should let the protagonist improve productivity, at least to the level of the Renaissance, and secondly, to have a sufficiently literate population. To eliminate illiteracy, you must first have more advanced crops, and the ones that have been bred with many varieties. Only then can enough people have time to receive education. The productivity at that time required the whole family to farm the land to ensure that they did not starve to death and to support the existing unemployed population. So a system for giving things is needed. As for expecting reforms to achieve equality, it is outrageous. Shang Yang's reforms essentially maintained the royal power and created a new class to fight against the old class. Even so, Shang Yang divided it into five equal parts. The rights of the King of Qin were given to him by the feudal system. The reform of equality and republic is equivalent to removing the system that gave the rights to the King of Qin. The more the rights are changed, the weaker the rights will be and the greater the resistance will be. In the end, it will inevitably get stuck. Reform can only be achieved through external push and coordination. Only externally promoted reforms are revolutions, and the monarch's cooperation with the reforms is a constitutional monarchy. I don't know how the author plans to create one or more classes to serve as this external force. Attached are two pictures to illustrate why so many comments think the goal is unrealistic, proving that everyone has done a good job in politics and history classes.

After reading the introduction, I was not interested in reading it. The emergence of modern society is due to the industrial revolution. Without these foundations, it is still a feudal monarchy. The protagonist did this during the Qin Dynasty. I want to eat it.

How should I put it? No matter what your thoughts are when writing historical articles, some historical common sense must be corrected. After reading the first few chapters, I couldn't stand it when I saw the prince and the princess. Did Qin have such titles at that time?

Reform will definitely touch the inherent interest groups, so the reformers either have extremely high power themselves, or have strong support from those in high positions. What about the protagonist? The good name is posted by myself for the sake of ideals and repaying kindness. You know, what comes to your door is not a sale. If the protagonist posts it himself, the monarch will think that your reform is to realize your personal values ​​and ideals. This is completely different from the monarch himself realizing the problem and seeking great talents and sages to come forward to reform. Therefore, the protagonist has no dignity at all when he enters the Qin Dynasty in the early stage, and is suppressed and framed at will. Throughout the ages, great sages have only come out to prove themselves, and few have been so humiliated and oppressed. With the protagonist's experience and knowledge, even if he stayed in Zhao country at first, he would still be hungry and would still be famous and prestigious. The Qin State unified the six kingdoms and many Zhao people were reused. Knowledgeable sages are highly respected in any age, and the protagonists can still be reused and can use their talents. So why should you shamelessly abandon your foundation and everything and run to Qin? How likely is a girl who leaves her family and career behind to run away with others to work hard to be happy? If it is too easy to get, it will not be cherished. The protagonist's path is really a bad move.

If you want equality for everyone, you have to oppose all the upper class people. If you want revolution, you need comrades. You couldn't find comrades in the Warring States Period.

It's very enjoyable to read in one sitting, the writing style is not impetuous, the writing is smooth, and the characters are three-dimensional. Even the villains are vivid and have their own personality characteristics. They are not forced to subdue the protagonist to set off the protagonist. I feel a lot more comfortable reading the whole story. Compared with other books, each has its own advantages. The advantage of this book is that the plots are interlocking. I suggest that you don't skip chapters, read more, and vote more. I vote first.

From what I have seen so far, the plot is smooth but the characters are not deep-minded. The analysis of the rule of law and the rule of man in the Warring States Period is not thorough enough. It does not mention the rule of law thoughts of Confucianism, Mohism and Taoism, the three major schools of thought in the world. Without a rule of law concept that adapts to the development of productive forces, it must pursue the ideal of equality for all, which seems too fake and empty. . I think the author can go a little deeper and refer to "History of Chinese Legal System".

There are no saints in Legalism. Laws change with time and worldly events, and worldly affairs are impermanent. Therefore, there is no permanent law in the world. There are no saints in Legalism.

What happened in ancient times? It's human beings. Where do you get the huge productivity to keep everyone fed? In modern society, in the 1980s and 1990s, some places still had insufficient food to eat. How could you do this thousands of years ago? In the ancient feudal dynasty, you were the first to die when you implemented reforms. What will be the outcome of Shang Yang in his later period? What happened to those who engaged in reform in ancient times?

The small-scale peasant economy is too fragile. It will collapse if a natural disaster occurs. If you want to jump from a feudal society to a socialist or capitalist society, you must at least meet the productivity standards. Those in Africa who jumped directly from slavery to capitalist society also changed their production relations because of the productivity provided by external capital. Moreover, it is not enough to achieve equality at least legal equality if the productivity standards are met. In reality, some countries are still monarchies or dictatorships even if the productivity standards are met. It is extremely difficult for one person to achieve productivity and culture and education together.

Why are Zhao Ji and the protagonist together? I still prefer that after the protagonist completes his great career, he retires and marries an ordinary woman he loves and lives a secluded life.

I have received the website. Welcome to invest. I will write it well this time. I want to become a god

Mencius and Confucianism seem to be equal, but in fact they are not. Slavery was not abolished at that time. Slaves were just objects and did not confer power on people. Confucius also advocated Zhou rites, but the hierarchy in Zhou rites was clear.

This book can be summarized as strengthening the six countries without unifying them. It seems to want to unify them on the surface. To be honest, it is absolutely impossible to control the quality of the writing and it has absolutely declined.

You call for equality, but can the monarch actually accept it? I think there is a high probability that it is not acceptable. I still have a question: Is the productivity of the pre-Qin era possible? The most important thing is that the people's wisdom is not yet enlightened, and you can only use paper if you are a nobleman. So how did your reform of Wei State be so successful? This span is too big. There are philosopher kings, kings, and citizens. To be honest, the real situation has already eliminated this philosopher king. The whole system is equivalent to revolutionizing the life of the king and the nobles. Can King Wei accept it? From the king's point of view, reform is necessary, because if we don't change, the country will be destroyed. But if we make such a change, those who say something bad will lose the position of the king, so it is better not to change! At least he can be king for a few more years. There is also the problem of people's wisdom mentioned above. How can the people have it at this time? Most people spend their entire lives living within thirty miles of the countryside, and in an era when the nobles do whatever they say, how do we directly bypass the nobles and directly control the people? To be honest, if I were this noble, I would definitely fight with you. If you dig out my roots, I will definitely fight with you to the end. There is also how glass is made. Although I am studying literature, it does not mean that I do not know everything. To burn pure glass, you must at least have a high-temperature-resistant workshop. How to extract impurities in glass? I think writing must be in line with productivity and when to do something. If it is reasonable to infer that there is a lot of theoretical support for careerists like the Warring States Period, we will also accept it. I don't agree with many parts of the book, but I still voted for the monthly vote and decided to read it because of the author's thoughts. I hope that the book will get better as it gets written. By the way, I can add some dialogue from the lower class people. Since I decided to write about equality, I have basically not seen the perspective of the lower class people so far. I recommend reading Mai. Ke's books, Fusheng in the Late Tang Dynasty, Long Sword in the Late Jin Dynasty, and the three books I'm currently pursuing, Shang Ming Zhao Tang, can be used as a reference. People are making progress little by little, so keep writing, and your writing style will gradually become sophisticated. I hope that this book can find rationality in the future, and don't pursue pure coolness. If there is a next book, it will be the same

I saw someone talking about equality in the comment area. Legalism advocates equality and governing the country according to law. If a big soldier can be promoted to a prince, this is not considered equality. On the other hand, Confucianism advocates inequality. The eldest son, wives and concubines, and classes are this and that.

Contradictory and highly toxic, I want to write about the people's view of history and pursue the establishment of a legal system where everyone is equal before the law, but all the plots in the story are about the heroic view of history of princes, generals and ministers. In the end, my own family became Sima Yi, who could not resist the temptation of power and rebelled. This is undoubtedly the greatest irony.

Well, after reading more than 200 chapters, I realized that it was really just talking about righteousness, but in the end it was still feudalism. The protagonist was begging and begging just to become a feudal holy king. At first, he just thought that establishing an eternal feudal dynasty was just a temporary excuse, but he didn't expect that he really wanted to do it. Please, stop being feudal, and even have some capitalist constitutional monarchy. (Ztm's waste of time)

. . . . . . . . . .

Why are there only these few comments now? Deleting the post is too serious.

More

If you are like me and have read many popular historical novels, you should also understand the difference between Zhongping and many protagonists. The Qin Dynasty was still too early for system changes. Perhaps you think that what Zhongping did in his later period was a bit ridiculous. He should be like other protagonists, princes and generals. Even if not, it is illogical to rashly propose a constitutional monarchy in that era when slavery has not yet ended. But you have to understand that Zhongping is going to die. When you take the role of a time traveler who is about to grow old and die, everything makes sense.

Do you know why so many people died during dynasty changes in ancient times? Because from top to bottom, the moral standards of almost all citizens in the entire country have been ruined. If we don't polish off an entire generation, we will not be able to achieve the political clarity in the early days of the new dynasty.

Author, how about writing about the Ming Dynasty in your next book?

It's quite bad, especially Zhao Ji's part, where she expresses problems and criticizes other people's selfish desires, but the reason for criticism is that they are inconsistent with her own ideals and opinions, and too much of my,,, my,,,. Just talking about it makes people feel like there is a double standard.