3000 Questions to Ask the Heaven and Discuss the Tao

To be honest, although I have only read one chapter, the amount of information contained in this chapter is already huge To be clear in advance, I have little knowledge of cutting-edge scientific theories, and I am more interested in philosophy, so I understand this issue from a philosophical perspective It is not God who created the world, but the world created God. As we all know, we often think that "existence" is the most basic attribute of matter, and that it must exist first. There can be matter, but we have overlooked one thing. We must first have matter before we can recognize existence. Rather than recognizing existence first and then recognizing matter, there is no doubt that in a world without life, the concept of existence does not exist. It is the movement of matter that constructs life, and then life recognizes matter, so existence is constructed retrospectively What does retrospective construction mean? Let me give you an example. I want to say that I eat. First of all, if you just listen to the word "I", you have no idea what I want to express. Even if "I" is already part of "I eat", you still can't know what I want to express. Only when I finish speaking can you understand I know, ah, you want to express "I eat something" in my example. What I want to say is that if existence really precedes matter, then it must transcend matter. So when you hear the word "I", you should know what I want to express, not only after you hear it. Going back to the previous article, existence is constructed retrospectively, then it is very simple. There is no creator in the universe, and material movement is the most fundamental foundation. The exquisite designs of the modern universe are actually meaningless. They are nothing more than chaos, nothing more than the interrelationship between matter, and nothing more than the movement of matter in time and space. In such chaos, differences distinguish them. But when you turn around and think about it, the spatial positions of this electron and this electron are different. They are obviously two different individuals. Why do I call them electrons and think they are the same thing? Is it because you grasped what they have in common? What determines this common ground? It is determined by the way you look at the world, and by the "laws" of how you distinguish similarities and differences. You choose to look at the world based on time and space, and on this basis, you look at things with similar causal relationships. Then you discover, wow, some parts of this world are too cleverly designed, right? Is this probability too small? It's hard not to make people wonder whether it was artificially constructed, but in fact, it was you who first set up a framework for the world to understand them. Only within this framework can you understand them. And then you say this is too coincidental, right? In fact, there is a possibility that the coincidences in our eyes are actually the same to themselves? So in a sense, objective differences certainly exist, but the subject is also involved in the discovery and creation of its special laws, because this law can be understood by us humans. It is the subject who chooses to understand the differences from the objective differences and creates the laws he recognizes. This passage is very important. It is the subject's own choice and understanding of the differences among the objective differences, and the rules that he creates and recognizes. This passage is very important. Rather than directly making the subject completely independent from the objective world, observing the laws of the objective universe, and finding that the objective universe is so ingenious, I believe that this must be the exquisite design of the Creator My mind is not clear when typing in the middle of the night. There may be some expression errors, please forgive me.

Each chapter has content, and each chapter is different.

I think it's pretty good, Lao Bai might like it more. The aroma of wine is also afraid of the deep alley, and the starting point is not classified like you.

Creationism/demiurgeism, these views can neither be proven nor disproven. If you believe it, there will be something, if you don't believe it, there will be nothing. I'm afraid this can't be called an answer, right? And even if there really is a Creator, can we understand Him with human thinking? After all, humans know nothing about Him.

This platform has a large number of martial arts and time-travel dramas with a small audience, and there is no theoretical knowledge category, so it is normal to be on the sidelines. What is gratifying is that if you can persist for a month without giving up, it is worth recommending.

The author should have carefully studied the Republic, right? Such a familiar Platonic flavor.

After receiving your red envelope, I have to show off. It's just that your novel feels like a wise man explaining his understanding to mortals. I feel that this subject matter has a small audience. After all, your book is suitable for thinking and thinking. For example, you take a bowl of mountain spring water to sell, but it is surrounded by various beverages, mineral water, beverages, etc. The Analects of Confucius is about questions and answers between Confucius and his disciples. It can be included in the novel section, but young people rarely read it. This is the prevailing fast food culture of most people, and a small number of private kitchens. If you rely on private kitchens, your reputation has not been established.

In fact, I have thought about it for a long time, if the Creator doesn't know anything. How did everything in the universe come about? Just like you said, you can't imagine what you haven't seen before (I don't know what the original words were, hehe). Even if you have endless time, you can't imagine it. Just like I only know how to play with mobile phones, but I don't know how to make mobile phones. I can't even think of screws, so how could I think of screws to fix them.

"An old man who traveled back in time picked up rags and made a living by making bad movies" [Nod to see directly] A director graduate from his past life, accidentally time traveled and became an old man who picked up rags. He worked hard in variety shows, worked professionally, blackmailed people as a group actor, begged and explored ghosts on live broadcasts, sold fake goods, made horror videos to scare people, and made bad movies to survive. Traveling through different worlds to collect film materials and returning them to the big screen in reality, the audience went crazy watching it. You can invest with confidence

Words are the carrier of stories, and books are an extension of the author. There is nothing wrong with that, but you have to write this on a novel website. Of course it is not impossible, but the problem is. . . It's difficult to comment. You know it well. Take me for example. If I see a similar topic on a forum, I will participate in the discussion, but on a novel website, I will just flip through it. Posting this also depends on your seriousness in writing. I will not comment on the opinions. It is just that as far as this book is concerned, it is published on this platform. Doubt is a wrong choice. In fact, this should be more of a brainstorming discussion post. After all, what you are talking about is not an established fact or a certain type of theorem, but just your own thoughts. So, novel is not a novel, knowledge is not knowledge. Anyway, I am not among the audience of this book. Farewell and excuse me.

Come on, you are very talented and your articles have high intentions. There must be Bole, no, I'm wrong, you will definitely be able to find a Taoist friend who has the same soul as you. Go towards the road you believe in, come on

I think the author can put text into video! More people will discuss this

Congratulations, the group of 100 people has been formed!

I'd better post a post to support it, it's not that the book is bad. But there is a weird thing. I can only read this type of book in paper form.

Your IP is in the United States, do you work in the United States? Did you imagine the content in this book?

Personally, I think these contents are more suitable to be made into videos. The point of view of the novel should be hidden a little and expressed directly in the form of dialogue, which is a bit unacceptable.