The Old Evil God of the Cyber ​​Age

The book is generally okay, but the dialogue between the characters is too gentlemanly. In the latest chapter, when the protagonist calls to say that the other person is dead, it always feels like they are singing the dialogue in a stage play. It is very suitable for the kind of long articles that are very gorgeous in themselves, the kind of articles with a chapter of ten thousand words. The advantage is: it will stir up the emotions. The disadvantage: it will make the emotion less intense. In a novel of two thousand words like this, it would slip by very blandly. Moreover, this style of speaking is more suitable for those who want to write Western medieval literature like Shakespeare. While watching it, the dialogue always reminded me of The Merchant of Venice. But the biggest problem is that this is a fast-paced sci-fi cyber world. pa: Of course, everyone has different ideas. If the author really wants to create a style of writing, he can write more and try to make it as long as possible while increasing his conspiracy IQ. Betrayal is either a last resort in a big scene, a smooth transition in a small scene, or a true and false conspiracy. From a certain perspective, the enemy's IQ and B-level determine the protagonist's B-level. It's not very smart to give a careless phone call and casually believe the protagonist's words. Generally speaking, it is said that it was lowered intentionally. Either turn it into fast-paced ordinary dialogue and write in a traditional literary style, or increase the number of plot words and intrigue and write in a more literary style. It's a little awkward in the middle