Reborn as an Industrial Mogul

To be honest, the author is too idealistic. Copyright is too important. Copyright is the weapon of big companies, not the protection of small companies. Decades ago, there were many cases of plagiarism, patent grabbing, and patent lawsuits in Shansai. For this kind of small invention, a big company directly invested in a small company and directly copied it to seize the market. When you know that you will sue, it will be a small company that will sue you. It can drag you out of business before buying you, and even lending you some money to start with you and delay your payment.

The book talks about taking your wife on a plane with you many times. I say it's ugly. It's strange that those British and Chinese people don't cause trouble. If one thing happens, they will all die.

The Qing laws in Hong Kong 70 years ago have not been abolished. Find some good helpers with both talents and appearance.

I hope this book's business choices will be more reasonable, and the areas of business won't be so broad. A consortium will be very strong if it can specialize in just a few. Don't choose the heroine blindly. If you don't know how to choose, it will be better if you don't write it than if you choose blindly.

The biggest problem with this book is that the sense of immersion is very poor. It is written like a strategy game. The characters, including the protagonist, are not treated as human beings. They seem to be tools to complete the author's plan. If you want to feel happy, you don't just have to succeed and make money. You should try to imagine yourself in that era and then deduce it. Of course it is worthy of being written about industry in the previous book. The mouse-catching start is very reasonable. The author has also checked a lot of information. In terms of rationality, the book on Hong Kong industry is second only to the book "Rebirth of the Electronic Empire" many years ago. But again, the characters have no flesh and blood. The society in the 1950s and 1960s was relatively chaotic. If you should lick, you should lick, you should pay tribute, and if you should give up some interests, you should give up, and the characters and plots will be fuller.

If you don't have your own territory and weapons, and you don't have the ability to make others afraid of playing with everyone, you are no different from a plate of food, you just wait and see when others want to eat it.

The writing in the early stage is okay, but later on the protagonist starts doing everything, which is quite disgusting! To produce a product, everyone upstream and downstream wants to do it. If we want to make mobile phones, do we need to open thousands of factories?

I saw Chapter 212, and the book friend's comments made me laugh to death. Did the bank do you a "great favor" by giving you a loan? Does the bank have no risk control? Banks have no rules? How can you infer favors from normal business practices? The bank has given you the money and is waiting to earn interest from you. If you can't repay it, should the bank reduce the amount? Because the bank is in trouble and you ask the protagonist to help him, then if the protagonist can't pay back the money, can he stop paying it back?

The protagonist 62 went to the United States and chartered a Boeing 737. But Boeing didn't launch the Boeing 737 passenger plane until 1965. Before that, there was only the Boeing 707 passenger plane. Futures contracts have a time limit, ranging from one month to three months, but not too long. It is impossible for the protagonist to buy a gold contract and leave it for a few years. The contract needs to be closed when it expires and then bought again. When everyone is bullish on gold, there will be no short-selling counterparty unless they buy physical gold. Long term holding. The protagonist earns more than 10 billion US dollars, which means that the opponent loses more than 10 billion US dollars. Is this possible? It is estimated that he made hundreds of millions of dollars. In the past few years, the British bank Barings lost one billion U. S. Dollars and went bankrupt.

How embarrassing! Everything has to be related to charity, and everything we do is to benefit this and that. I can't stand it anymore.